• Complain

D. Sunshine Hillygus - The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns

Here you can read online D. Sunshine Hillygus - The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Princeton, year: 2014, publisher: Princeton University Press, genre: Science / Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

D. Sunshine Hillygus The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns
  • Book:
    The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Princeton University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2014
  • City:
    Princeton
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The use of wedge issues such as abortion, gay marriage, and immigration has become standard political strategy in contemporary presidential campaigns. Why do candidates use such divisive appeals? Who in the electorate is persuaded by these controversial issues? And what are the consequences for American democracy? In this provocative and engaging analysis of presidential campaigns, Sunshine Hillygus and Todd Shields identify the types of citizens responsive to campaign information, the reasons they are responsive, and the tactics candidates use to sway these pivotal voters. The Persuadable Voter shows how emerging information technologies have changed the way candidates communicate, who they target, and what issues they talk about. As Hillygus and Shields explore the complex relationships between candidates, voters, and technology, they reveal potentially troubling results for political equality and democratic governance.The Persuadable Voter examines recent and historical campaigns using a wealth of data from national surveys, experimental research, campaign advertising, archival work, and interviews with campaign practitioners. With its rigorous multimethod approach and broad theoretical perspective, the book offers a timely and thorough understanding of voter decision making, candidate strategy, and the dynamics of presidential campaigns.

D. Sunshine Hillygus: author's other books


Who wrote The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

THE PERSUADABLE VOTER THE PERSUADABLE VOTER WEDGE ISSUES IN PRESIDENTIAL - photo 1

THE PERSUADABLE VOTER

THE PERSUADABLE VOTER

WEDGE ISSUES IN PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGNS

D. Sunshine Hillygus and Todd G. Shields

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS PRINCETON AND OXFORD

Copyright 2008 by Princeton University Press
Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540
In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW

All Rights Reserved

Hillygus, D. Sunshine.
The persuadable voter : wedge issues in presidential campaigns / D. Sunshine Hillygus and Todd G. Shields.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN: 978-0-691-13341-6 (hardcover : alk. paper)
1. PresidentsUnited StatesElection. 2. VotingUnited States.
3. United StatesPolitics and government. I. Shields, Todd G., 1968
II. Title.
JK528.H55 2008
324.70973dc22 2007037758

British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available

This book has been composed in Palatino

Printed on acid-free paper.

press.princeton.edu

Printed in the United States of America

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

In memory of Diane D. Blair, 19382000

Contents _____________________________________________________________

One
Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns

Two
The Reciprocal Campaign

Three
Measuring the Persuadable Partisan

Four
Capturing Campaign Persuasion

Five
The Republican Southern Strategy: A Case Study of the Reciprocal Campaign

Six
Candidate Strategy in the 2004 Campaign

Seven
Conclusions: Consequences for Democratic Governance

Appendix 1
Question Wording and Coding

Appendix 2
Content Analysis Coding

Appendix 3
Statistical Results

List of Illustrations _____________________________________________________________

List of Tables _____________________________________________________________

Acknowledgments _____________________________________________________________

THIS STARTED OUT as a completely different book. We had planned on writing a book about voting behavior in the South as a tribute to our friend and mentor, Diane Blair. But intellectual ideas from a variety of projects bled together so that, ultimately, we have written a book about presidential campaigns, with just a single chapter focused on the South (although that chapter is one of our favorites). This topic is perhaps just as fitting for a book dedicated to Diane Blairshe was the rare academic who contributed both to political science and to the real world of campaign politics. Diane seamlessly blended her passion for research and teaching with her passion for politicsand that passion was infectious. As a freshman at the University of Arkansas in 1992, Sunshine got caught up in the excitement of the presidential campaign, and with Diane as a role model, changed her major to political science. To Todd, Diane served as a mentor when he was a young assistant professor at the University of Arkansas, demonstrating to him the direct link between scholarly research and real politics with her work during the 1996 presidential campaign.

The Diane D. Blair Center for Southern Politics and Society was created to honor Dianes legacy, and this book would not have been possible without the centers generous funding of two unique surveys. Funding from the Institute for Quantitative Social Science and a fellowship at the Shorenstein Center for the Press, Politics, and Public Policy gave Sunshine a full year of research leave to devote to writing. And because of the generous support of the Center for American Political Studies at Harvard University, we were able to hold a book conference around the first draft of the manuscript, providing critical feedback before it was too late to make changes.

We were able to include a great variety of data sources and analyses in this work only because of the willingness of so many scholars to share their data. Daron Shaw provided us with data on state-by-state candidate advertising and visit numbers from the 2000 and 2004 campaigns. Lee Sigelman and Emmet Buell shared their content analysis of New York Times coverage of the 19522004 presidential campaigns. Joel Rivlin with the Wisconsin Advertising Project gave us the issue content of the television advertising in the 2004 presidential campaign. We are especially grateful to Doug Rivers, Simon Jackman, and Norman Nie for their willingness to share the massive 2000 Knowledge Networks Election Study, which first gave Sunshine a chance to study campaigns as a graduate student at Stanford University. We also owe a special thanks to David Magleby, Kelly Patterson, and Quin Monson of the Center for the Study of Education and Democracy at Brigham Young University for providing access to the 2004 Campaign Communications Study. Quin Monson, in particular, provided critical help and advice for our analysis of the 2004 presidential direct mail.

As the topic of this book evolved, we greatly benefited from the valuable feedback and intellectual support of some of the smartest people in the discipline. We are especially grateful to those who were willing to read the entire manuscript draft: Adam Berinsky, Daron Shaw, Richard Johnston, Bob Shapiro, Paul Sniderman, Matt Baum, Mike Alvarez, Markus Prior, Eric Schickler, Sidney Verba, Mo Fiorina, Paul Peterson, Dennis Thompson, Sam Popkin, Norman Nie, Dave Peterson, Steven Kelts and Justin Grimmer. A very special thanks (its own sentence worth!) to Jennifer Lawless for going through the manuscript draft line by line just days before it was due. A number of other colleagues provided critical advice and suggestions at various stages in the project: Pippa Norris, Jane Junn, Gary King, Don Kelley, Shannon Davis, Jon Krosnick, and Tasha Philpot.

Along the way, we have received helpful suggestions and stimulating questions in presenting the project to different audiencespolitical science conferences as well as seminars at Vanderbilt University, Columbia University, University of Chicago, Harvard University, University of Minnesota, Stanford University, Brigham Young University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the Boston chapter of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. For especially thought-provoking and helpful comments, we would like to thank Gabe Lenz, Joanne Miller, Jeremy Pope, John Sides, Dan Carpenter, Andrea Campbell, Chap Lawson, Noah Kaplan, Phil Klinker, Bob Erikson, and Kirby Goidel. For their hard work, we would like to thank the terrific group of Harvard research assistants: Raul Campillo, Tiffany Washburn, Karen Harmel, David Daniels, Kevin Papay, and Matt Smith.

And, for helpful conversationsoccasionally about the book, but more often about more interesting topicsSunshine is grateful to Barry Burden, William Howell, Steven Kelts, Shawn Treier, Jennifer Jerit, Maggie Penn, John Patty, Jason Barabas, Cara Wong, and Jake Bowers. Todd also expresses his sincere appreciation to Jim Blair for his invaluable support and advice and for the positive and significant contributions he has made to Todds life and career.

We would also like to thank Chuck Myers, senior editor at Princeton University Press, for his enthusiastic endorsement of this project. He has helped to make the publication process the very easiest part of this project.

Last, but not least, we would like to express our gratitude to our families. If not for the unwavering encouragement, infinite patience, and numerous sacrifices of Joel Hillygus, this bookand Sunshines academic careerwould not have been possible. Karen ShieldsTodds wife for the past sixteen years and best friend for the past eighteen yearsas well as his children, Savannah and Dane, have also been exceptionally supportive throughout this project.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns»

Look at similar books to The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.