• Complain

Catalina González Quintero - Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant: A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics

Here you can read online Catalina González Quintero - Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant: A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Cham, year: 2022, publisher: Springer, genre: Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Catalina González Quintero Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant: A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics
  • Book:
    Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant: A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Springer
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2022
  • City:
    Cham
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant: A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant: A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

This book offers an unprecedented study of the influence of the skepticism of the New Platonic Academy on David Humes and Immanuel Kants critiques of metaphysics. By demonstrating how the skeptical teachings of the Academy affected these authors Enlightened attacks on traditional metaphysics, this book deepens and broadens the burgeoning scholarship on the role that the Ancients schools of skepticism played in the configuration of Modern skeptical outlooks. It bolsters the newfound recognition that we must reconsider the conventional view that the revival of Pyrrhonism in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries gave birth to Modern skepticism by incorporating the influence of Academic skepticism in the analysis.

Giving a new impetus to this line of research, the author argues that Academic ideas and methods informed Humes and Kants critique of metaphysics in substantial and thus far unacknowledged ways. Specifically, she demonstrates the centrality of Academic skepticism to Humes epistemology and critique of religion through a detailed analysis of his theory of belief in the Treatise and the first Enquiry as well as of its application in the Dialogues concerning Natural Religion. Likewise, her analysis reveals how Kants anti-metaphysical stance, developed in the Transcendental Dialectic of the Critique of Pure Reason, contains many skeptical insights of Academic inspiration, bequeathed to him by Hume.

Catalina González Quintero: author's other books


Who wrote Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant: A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant: A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant: A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Contents
Landmarks
Book cover of Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant Volume 449 Synthese - photo 1
Book cover of Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant
Volume 449
Synthese Library Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science
Editor-in-Chief
Otvio Bueno
Department of Philosophy, University of Miami, USA
Editorial Board
Berit Brogaard
University of Miami, USA
Anjan Chakravartty
Department of Philosophy, University of Miami, USA
Steven French
University of Leeds, UK
Catarina Dutilh Novaes
VU Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Lingnan University, Hong Kong
Emma Ruttkamp
University of South Africa, South Africa
Kristie Miller
University of Sydney, Australia

The aim of Synthese Library is to provide a forum for the best current work in the methodology and philosophy of science and in epistemology. A wide variety of different approaches have traditionally been represented in the Library, and every effort is made to maintain this variety, not for its own sake, but because we believe that there are many fruitful and illuminating approaches to the philosophy of science and related disciplines.

Special attention is paid to methodological studies which illustrate the interplay of empirical and philosophical viewpoints and to contributions to the formal (logical, set-theoretical, mathematical, information-theoretical, decision-theoretical, etc.) methodology of empirical sciences. Likewise, the applications of logical methods to epistemology as well as philosophically and methodologically relevant studies in logic are strongly encouraged. The emphasis on logic will be tempered by interest in the psychological, historical, and sociological aspects of science.

Besides monographs Synthese Library publishes thematically unified anthologies and edited volumes with a well-defined topical focus inside the aim and scope of the book series. The contributions in the volumes are expected to be focused and structurally organized in accordance with the central theme(s), and should be tied together by an extensive editorial introduction or set of introductions if the volume is divided into parts. An extensive bibliography and index are mandatory.

More information about this series at https://link.springer.com/bookseries/6607

Catalina Gonzlez Quintero
Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant
A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics
Logo of the publisher Catalina Gonzlez Quintero Department of Philosophy - photo 2
Logo of the publisher
Catalina Gonzlez Quintero
Department of Philosophy, Universidad de los Andes, Bogot, Colombia
ISSN 0166-6991 e-ISSN 2542-8292
Synthese Library
ISBN 978-3-030-89749-9 e-ISBN 978-3-030-89750-5
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89750-5
The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG

The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland

To Bertha and Nono

Thesis and antithesis

About the Author

Catalina Gonzlez Quintero earned her Ph.D. in philosophy from Emory University in the USA and is currently Associate Professor of Philosophy at Universidad de los Andes in Bogot, Colombia. Her research focuses on the history of modern philosophy, particularly in the areas of skepticism and rhetoric. She has published various articles and book chapters on the philosophy of Cicero, Kant, Hume, and Vico in US, European, and Latin American journals as well as in compilations published by Springer, Palgrave, De Gruyter, SUNY Press, Lawrence Erlbaum, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, and Universidad de los Andes.

I am indeed a rash person to attempt to join issue with a pupil of the Academy who is also a trained orator!

An Academic unversed in rhetoric I should not have been much afraid of, nor yet an orator, however eloquent, who was not reinforced by that system of philosophy;for I am not disconcerted by a mere stream of empty verbiage, not yet by the subtlety of thought if it is expressed in a jejune style.

Cicero, De Natura Deorum

Acknowledgments

This book is the result of several years of research and numerous courses taught at Universidad de los Andes (Bogot, Colombia) on ancient and modern skepticism. I want to thank the University for its academic and financial support. Funding from the School of Social Sciences, in particular, enabled me to conduct research in Berlin (Germany) to gather primary and secondary sources, and to take a research leave at DePaul University (Chicago, USA), where I finished writing the manuscript in Spanish. I am grateful to Mara del Rosario Acosta and the Department of Philosophy at DePaul University for this invitation, without which my stay would not have been possible.

Many people participated in the different stages of writing this manuscript. I want to thank them all, even if I do not mention someone specifically here. I am deeply indebted to the late Rudolf Makkreel, for giving me the gift of a heterodox reading of Kant, and Steven Strange, for introducing me to Ciceros skepticism. My special thanks to Peter Cousins, who patiently prepared the translation of this book into English. I am grateful to Luis Carlos Surez for his help in searching for sources and handling the references of Kants Gesammelte Schriften; to Felipe Gonzlez for his translation of Greek and Latin terminology; to Andrea Lozano, Ignacio vila, and Mariluz Restrepo for their reading and commenting on early drafts; to Manuel Corts for his arduous work confirming bibliographical references and editing the Spanish manuscript; and to Alfonso Correa Motta for his comments on the first two chapters of the book. I cannot stress enough my gratitude to Allison Wolf for not only reading, commenting, and editing the entire book (a massive effort, indeed) but also giving me the confidence I needed to publish it in English. I am especially grateful to Lismaco Parra for giving me the courage to pursue a career in philosophy and for our long (and sometimes heated!) conversations about Kant, Hume, and religion. My friends know how much this book owes them for their constant encouragement during these years. Among them, am particularly grateful to Antonio Snchez, Marcela and Santiago Villegas, and Marcela Garca for their support at the most challenging moments of writing this manuscript. Finally, I want to thank my very dear family, my siblings Alberto and Mara Leonor, as well as their spouses and children, for their love and care. And, of course, Algaraba, for always living up to her name!

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant: A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics»

Look at similar books to Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant: A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant: A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics»

Discussion, reviews of the book Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant: A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.