• Complain

Thomas Kelly - Bias: A Philosophical Study

Here you can read online Thomas Kelly - Bias: A Philosophical Study full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Oxford, year: 2023, publisher: Oxford University Press, genre: Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Thomas Kelly Bias: A Philosophical Study
  • Book:
    Bias: A Philosophical Study
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Oxford University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2023
  • City:
    Oxford
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Bias: A Philosophical Study: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Bias: A Philosophical Study" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Bias seems to be everywhere. Biased media outlets decisively influence the political opinions and votes of millions of people. Discriminatory policies favor some racial groups over others. We tend to judge ourselves more favorably than our peers, and more favorably than the evidence warrants. But what is it, exactly, for a person or thing to be biased?
In Bias: A Philosophical Study, Thomas Kelly explores a number of foundational questions about the nature of bias and our practices of attributing it. He develops a general framework for thinking about bias, the norm theoretic account, and shows how that framework illuminates much that we say and think about bias in both everyday life and the sciences. He argues provocatively that both morality and rationality sometimes require us to be biased; that groups of people can be biased even if none of their members are; that we are often rationally required to believe that those who disagree with us are biased, even if we know absolutely nothing about why they believe as they do or about their psychologies; and that whether someone counts as biased is often a relative matter. He defends the possibility of what he calls biased knowing and argues that the phenomenon has significant implications for both philosophical methodology and scepticism.
A central aim of the book is to expand the range of issues that have thus far been considered under the heading the philosophy of bias by putting new theoretical questions on the table and proposing bold answers that can serve as starting points for future inquiry.

Bias: A Philosophical Study — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Bias: A Philosophical Study" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Bias A Philosophical Study - image 1
Bias

Bias A Philosophical Study - image 2

Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the Universitys objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries

Thomas Kelly 2022

The moral rights of the author have been asserted

First Edition published in 2022

Impression: 1

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above

You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer

Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press

198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America

British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data

Data available

Library of Congress Control Number: 2022940834

ISBN 9780192842954

ebook ISBN 9780192654618

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192842954.001.0001

Printed and bound in the UK by

Clays Ltd, Elcograf S.p.A.

Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials contained in any third party website referenced in this work.

To the people who taught me philosophy

at Harvard University,

and at the University of Notre Dame

Contents

Almost all of this book consists of previously unpublished material. The main exception to this is Chapter 6, , which updates material drawn from my paper Following the Argument Where It Leads, Philosophical Studies (2011). I utilize that material with the permission of Springer Publishers.

In addition to those thanked in that paper, I would also like to acknowledge a number of other individuals and institutions for their help along the way. Earlier versions of some of these ideas were presented in talks that I gave at Rutgers, Princeton, Notre Dame, Fordham, Union College, the Orange Beach Epistemology Workshop sponsored by the University of Alabama, and at Pacific and Eastern division meetings of the American Philosophical Association. I am grateful to the audiences present on those occasions for their feedback. Material for the book was presented in two graduate seminars, one at Princeton, the other at a joint Rutgers-Princeton seminar co-taught with Ernest Sosa. I am grateful to the participants in those seminars, and especially to Ernie for proposing our joint seminar and suggesting that I present some of my work on bias as my contribution to it. Two readers for Oxford University Press, one of whom was Endre Begby, the other of whom remains anonymous, provided timely, very helpful, and much appreciated sets of comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. In addition, I would like to acknowledge the following individuals for their help: Robert Audi, Alisabeth Ayars, Nathan Ballantyne, Lara Buchak, Pietro Cibinel, Brett Copenger, Silvia De Toffoli, Sinan Dogramaci, Felipe Doria, Andy Egan, Adam Elga, Jan Engelmann, Johann Frick, Samuel Fullhart, Fiona Furnari, Dan Garber, Jorge Garcia, Jeremy Goodman, Peter Graham, Alex Guerrero, Elizabeth Harman, Brian Hedden, Grace Helton, Thomas Hurka, Mark Johnston, Brett Karlan, Hilary Kornblith, Barry Lam, Tania Lombrozo, Harvey Lederman, Sebastian Liu, Errol Lord, Jon Matheson, Aidan McGlynn, Sarah McGrath, Tori McGeer, Philip Pettit, Ted Poston, Emily Pronin, Katie Carpenter Rech, Gideon Rosen, Peter Singer, Michael Smith, Joshua Smith, Roy Sorensen, Meghan Sullivan, Una Stojni, Katia Vavova, Mike Veber, and Snow Zhang.

For some of the information about John Cook Wilsons life used in the Introduction, I relied on Mathiew Marions entry on Wilson in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Peter Momtchiloff was an ideal editor, full of judicious advice and preternatural patience for my many missed deadlines, only some of which could plausibly be blamed on a global pandemic. I thank him for his encouragement and support of the project.

My greatest intellectual debts are to the people who taught me philosophy, to whom this book is dedicated. My love for philosophy was first ignited as an undergraduate at the University of Notre Dame in the 1990s when I encountered an unusually inspiring and encouraging group of teachers, a group that included Neil Delaney Sr., Alasdair MacIntyre, Marian David, Vaughn McKim, David Solomon, Mike Loux, David OConnor, Leopold Stubenberg, Karl Ameriks, Fred Freddoso, and Philip Quinn. Decades later, my memories of those early interactions continue to provide me with models for what a good teacher of philosophy should be like. At Harvard University, I had the further exceptionally good fortune to have as advisers Robert Nozick, Derek Parfit, and Jim Pryor, each of whom was almost unbelievably helpful and supportive of me in overlapping and complementary ways. When I finished my dissertation, each of the three advised me to publish it as a book, but I demurred, on the grounds that no one would want to read an entire book of philosophy by a previously unpublished graduate student. Although this book is not the one that they encouraged me to write, one of the standards that I kept in mind while writing it was to produce a book that they would have found worthwhile, and something that I would have been proud to present to them. Im sorry that Ill never have the chance to present a copy to Bob or Derek, or to discuss its ideas with them.

My greatest debts of all are to my family. Thanks to my wife Sarah McGrath for all that you did for me and for our children during the years in which this book was written. Thanks to Owen, Orla, and Hugh for being the source of most of my smiles, and for making things seem worthwhile. Finally, thank you to my parents, Tom and Toddy Kelly, for your unwavering and unstinting love and support in all things, for as long as I can remember.

Which types of human beings best exemplify true courage?

When asked this question, some people might immediately think of soldiers on a battlefield or of firefighters rushing into a burning building. Others might think first of political dissidents or civil rights activists, individuals who knowingly risk grave harm in order to speak Truth to Power.

When the philosopher Plato posed this question over two thousand years ago, he offered us a surprising answer. True courage, Plato suggested, is most likely to be found among the philosophers. Even allowing for the significant differences between the philosophers of Platos time and the professors of philosophy of the 21st century, Platos answer to his own question does not exactly leap off the page at the reader as the most plausible thing he might have come up withto put it mildly. Moreover, coming as it does from Plato, the answer strikes us not only as implausible but also as suspicious. Its very much the type of answer that we might expect a philosopherbut no one else!to give. Although he offers us a characteristically complicated argument for his view, we naturally suspect Plato of bias when he tells us that its really the philosophers who are the most courageous of all.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Bias: A Philosophical Study»

Look at similar books to Bias: A Philosophical Study. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Bias: A Philosophical Study»

Discussion, reviews of the book Bias: A Philosophical Study and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.