Roudinesco - Philosophy in turbulent times : Canguilhem, Sartre, Foucault, Althusser, Deleuze, Derrida

Philosophy in turbulent times : Canguilhem, Sartre, Foucault, Althusser, Deleuze, Derrida — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Philosophy in turbulent times : Canguilhem, Sartre, Foucault, Althusser, Deleuze, Derrida" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

↓

↑

Georgia Tahoma Arial Verdana

Reset

Interval:

↓

↑

Bookmark:

Make

1234567...48

PHILOSOPHY IN TURBULENT TIMES

Columbia University Press

Publishers Since 1893

New York Chichester, West Sussex

cup.columbia.edu

Copyright 2005 Librarie Arthme Fayard

Copyright 2008 Columbia University Press

Paperback edition, 2010

All rights reserved

E-ISBN 978-0-231-51885-7

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication

Roudinesco, Elisabeth, 1944

[Philosophes dans la tourmente. English]

Philosophy in turbulent times: Canguilhem, Sartre, Foucault, Althusser, Deleuze, Derrida / Elisabeth Roudinesco; translated by William McCuaig.

p. cm.

Includes bibliographical references (p.).

ISBN 978-0-231-14300-4 (cloth: alk. paper)ISBN 978-0-231-14301-1 (pbk. : alk. paper)ISBN 978-0-231-51885-7 (e-book)

1. PhilosophyFranceHistory20th century. 2. Philosophy, French20th century. 3. PhilosophersFranceHistory20th century. I. Title.

B2421.R6813 2008

194dc22

2008021953

A Columbia University Press E-book.

CUP would be pleased to hear about your reading experience with this e-book at .

References to Internet Web sites (URLs) were accurate at the time of writing. Neither the author nor Columbia University Press is responsible for URLs that may have expired or changed since the manuscript was prepared.

To Christian Jambet

CONTENTS

W E ARE CERTAINLY LIVING IN STRANGE TIMES . The commemoration of great events, great men, great intellectual achievements, and great virtues never stops; weve had the year of Rimbaud, the year of Victor Hugo, the year of Jules Verne. And yet, never have revisionist attacks on the foundations of every discipline, every doctrine, every emancipatory adventure enjoyed such prestige. Feminism, socialism, and psychoanalysis are violently rejected, and Freud, Marx, and Nietzsche are pronounced dead, along with every kind of critique of the norm. All we are entitled to do, it would seem, is to take stock and draw up assessments, as though the distance that every intellectual enterprise requires amounted to no more than a vast ledger full of entries for things and peopleor rather people who have become things.

I am not thinking just of Holocaust denial, which has been outlawed among professional historians, although its influence persists in semi-secrecy. Instead what I have in mind are those ordinary little revisionisms that tend, for example, to put Vichy and the Resistance on the same footing, because of the necessity to relativize heroism, and the drive to oppugn the idea of rebellion. Another example is the clever reinterpretation of textual evidence to make Salvador Allende into a racist, an anti-Semite, and a eugenicist, for the purpose of denigrating the putative founding myths of socialism around the world.

As for philosophy, while its place in the educational curriculum of the schools and universities is threatened by all those who judge it useless, outmoded, too Greek or too German, and impossible to put a price on or fit into a scientistic pigeonhole (in sum, too subversive), the drive to philosophize or learn to think for oneself is expanding outside the institutions of the state, embracing Plato, Socrates, the pre-Socratic materialists, the Latins, the moderns, the postmoderns, the old and new moderns, the new or old reactionaries. There is a gap between the academicism that is returning in force to official schooling and the massive demand for living teaching outside the universities, and this gap continues to grow wider in a world haunted by fear of the loss of identity, boundaries, and national particularism.

Feature stories in our periodicals and newspapers almost all convey a catastrophic outlook: the end of history, the end of ideology, the end of towering individuals, the end of thought, the end of mankind, the end of everything. Jean-Paul Sartrefor or against? Raymond Aronfor or against? Would it suit you better to be in the right with the former as against the latter, or vice versa? Should we take a blowtorch to May 1968 and its ideas, its thinkers, and their writings, seen now as incomprehensible, elitist, dangerous, and antidemocratic? Have the protagonists of that revolution in behavior and mentality all become little bourgeois capitalist pleasure seekers without faith or principles, or havent they?

Everywhere the same questions, and everywhere the same answers, all claiming to bear witness to a new malaise of civilization. The father has vanished, but why not the mother? Isnt the mother really just a father, in the end, and the father a mother? Why do young people not think anything? Why are children so unbearable? Is it because of Franoise Dolto, or television, or pornography, or comic books? And leading thinkerswhat has become of them? Are they dead, or gestating, or hibernating? Or are they on the road to extinction?

And women: are they capable of supervising male workers on the same basis as men are? Of thinking like men, of being philosophers? Do they have the same brain, the same neurons, the same emotions, the same criminal instincts? Was Christ the lover of Mary Magdalene, and if so, does that mean that the Christian religion is sexually split between a hidden feminine pole and a dominant masculine one?

Has France become decadent? Are you for Spinoza, Darwin, Galileo, or against? Are you partial to the United States? Wasnt Heidegger a Nazi? Was Michel Foucault the precursor of Bin Laden, Gilles Deleuze a drug addict, Jacques Derrida a deconstructed guru? Was Napoleon really so different from Hitler? State the similarities, proffer your thoughts, assess your knowledge, speak for yourself.

Whom do you prefer; who are the puniest figures, the greatest ones, the most mediocre, the biggest charlatans, the most criminal? Classify, rank, calculate, measure, put a price on, normalize: this is the absolute nadir of contemporary interrogation, endlessly imposing itself in the name of a bogus modernity that undermines every form of critical intelligence grounded in the analysis of the complexity of things and persons.

Never has sexuality been so untrammeled, and never has science progressed so far in the exploration of the body and the brain. Yet never has psychological suffering been more intense: solitude, use of mind-altering drugs, boredom, fatigue, dieting, obesity, the medicalization of every second of existence. The freedom of the self, so necessary, and won at the cost of so much struggle during the twentieth century, seems to have turned back into a demand for puritanical restraint. As for social suffering, it is increasingly harder to bear because it seems to be constantly on the rise, against a background of youth unemployment and tragic factory closings.

Set free from the shackles of morality, sex is experienced not as the correlate of desire, but as performance, as gymnastics, as hygiene for the organs that can only lead to deathly lassitude. How does one climax, and bring ones partner to climax. What is the ideal size of the vagina, the correct length of the penis? How often? How many partners in a lifetime, in a week, in a single day, minute by minute? Never has the psychology of conditioning, of sexological or partner-swapping alienation been so overpowering as it is today. So much so that by now we are seeing a surge in complaints of every kind. The more individuals are promised happiness and the ideal of security, the more their unhappiness persists, the steeper the risk profile grows, and the more the victims of unkept promises revolt against those who have betrayed them.

Next page

1234567...48

Light

Font size:

↓

↑

Georgia Tahoma Arial Verdana

Reset

Interval:

↓

↑

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Philosophy in turbulent times : Canguilhem, Sartre, Foucault, Althusser, Deleuze, Derrida»

Look at similar books to Philosophy in turbulent times : Canguilhem, Sartre, Foucault, Althusser, Deleuze, Derrida. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.

William C. Dowling

Jameson, Althusser, Marx (RLE Marxism): An Introduction to The Political Unconscious

Canguilhem Georges

On The Normal And The Pathological

Braidotti

Patterns of Dissonance: a Study of Women and Contemporary Philosophy

Keith Ansell-Pearson (editor)

Deleuze and Philosophy: The Difference Engineer

Badiou Alain

Jacques Lacan, past and present: a dialogue

Elisabeth Roudinesco

Lacan - In Spite Of Everything

Johann Michel

Ricoeur and the Post-Structuralists: Bourdieu, Derrida, Deleuze, Foucault, Castoriadis

Keith Ansell Pearson (ed.)

Deleuze and Philosophy: The Difference Engineer

Michel Foucault

Archaeology of Knowledge

Elisabeth Roudinesco

Our Dark Side: A History of Perversion

Elisabeth Roudinesco

Philosophy in Turbulent Times: Canguilhem, Sartre, Foucault, Althusser, Deleuze, Derrida

Louis Althusser

The Spectre Of Hegel: Early Writings

Discussion, reviews of the book Philosophy in turbulent times : Canguilhem, Sartre, Foucault, Althusser, Deleuze, Derrida and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.