• Complain

Mark Kremer (ed.) - Plato’s Cleitophon: On Socrates and the Modern Mind

Here you can read online Mark Kremer (ed.) - Plato’s Cleitophon: On Socrates and the Modern Mind full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2004, publisher: Lexington Books, genre: Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Mark Kremer (ed.) Plato’s Cleitophon: On Socrates and the Modern Mind
  • Book:
    Plato’s Cleitophon: On Socrates and the Modern Mind
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Lexington Books
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2004
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Plato’s Cleitophon: On Socrates and the Modern Mind: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Plato’s Cleitophon: On Socrates and the Modern Mind" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

It had been thought that theCleitophon was a spurious dialogue. Its brevity and the fact that Socrates does not respond to accusations from Cleitophon suggested to scholars that it was only a fragment. However, in the last fifteen years, the complete and authentic dialogue was rediscovered. Upon its discovery, scholars have almost universally agreed that the Cleitophon is the introduction to PlatosRepublic. In Platos Cleitophon: On Socrates and the Modern Mind editor, translator, and author, Mark Kremer, has mined some of the best scholarship on the relationship of Platos Cleitophon and its relationship to modern thought. It is the contention of the editor that the Cleitophon, is an ancient example of the psychic, social, cultural, and moral strain that is put upon the citizens of a republic when their society begins to erode on all fronts. This work has the potential to afford readers an ancient perspective on ourselves by showing us how we appear in Platos mind. It should be read by anyone who has ever read PlatosRepublic; as well as anyone who is concerned about the social, psychic, cultural, and moral effects of postmodernity and globalization.

Mark Kremer (ed.): author's other books


Who wrote Plato’s Cleitophon: On Socrates and the Modern Mind? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Plato’s Cleitophon: On Socrates and the Modern Mind — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Plato’s Cleitophon: On Socrates and the Modern Mind" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
APPLICATIONS OF POLITICAL THEORY Series Editors Harvey Mansfield Harvard - photo 1
APPLICATIONS OF POLITICAL THEORY
Series Editors: Harvey Mansfield, Harvard University, and Daniel J. Mahoney, Assumption College

This series encourages analysis of the applications of political theory to various domains of thought and action. Such analysis will include works on political thought and literature, statesmanship, American political thought, and contemporary political theory. The editors also anticipate and welcome examinations of the place of religion in public life and commentary on classic works of political philosophy.

Reason, Revelation, and Human Affairs: Selected Writings of James V. Schall, edited and introduced by Marc D. Guerra

Faith, Reason, and Political Life Today, edited by Peter Augustine Lawler and Dale McConkey

Masters and Slaves: Revisioned Essays in Political Philosophy, by Michael Palmer

Tyranny in Shakespeare, by Mary Ann McGrail

Sensual Philosophy: Toleration, Skepticism, and Montaignes Politics of the Self, by Alan Levine

Gladly to Learn and Gladly to Teach: Essays on Religion and Political Philosophy in Honor of Ernest L. Fortin, A.A., edited and introduced by Michael P. Foley and Douglas Kries

Dissent and Philosophy in the Middle Ages: Dante and His Precursors, by Ernest L. Fortin; translated by Marc A. LePain

Behemoth Teaches Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes on Political Education, by Geoffrey M. Vaughan

The Dialogue in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu: Humanitarian Despotism and the Conditions of Modern Tyranny, by Maurice Joly; edited and translated by John S. Waggoner

Cultivating Citizens: Soulcraft and Citizenship in Contemporary America, edited by Dwight D. Allman and Michael D. Beaty

Liberty, Wisdom, and Grace: Thomism and Democratic Political Theory, by John P. Hittinger

The Paradox of Philosophical Education: Nietzsches New Nobility and the Eternal Recurrence in Beyond Good and Evil, by J. Harvey Lomax

Faith, Morality, and Civil Society, edited by Dale McConkey and Peter Augustine Lawler

History of American Political Thought, edited by Bryan-Paul Frost and Jeffrey Sikkenga

Totalitarianism and the Prospects for World Order: Closing the Door on the Twentieth Century, by Aleksandras Shtromas; and edited by Daniel J. Mahoney and Robert Faulkner

Liberalism under Siege: The Political Thought of the French Doctrinaires, b6y Aurelian Craiutu

Assault on Ideology, second edition, by James F. Pontuso

Platos Cleitophon: On Socrates and the Modern Mind, edited, introduced, and translated by Mark Kremer

The editors gratefully acknowledge permission to reprint material from the - photo 2

The editors gratefully acknowledge permission to reprint material from the following journals: Canadian Journal of Political Science, Interpretation, Ancient Philosophy , and The Review of Politics .

LEXINGTON BOOKS

Published in the United States of America
by Lexington Books
An imprint of The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc.
4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706

PO Box 317
Oxford
OX2 9RU, UK

Translation, introduction, and essay Copyright 2004 by Lexington Books

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher.

British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Platos Cleitophon : on Socrates and the modern mind / edited by Mark Kremer.

p. cm.(Applications of political theory)

Includes bibliographical references and index.

9780739158920

1. Plato. Clitophon. 2. Socrates. 3. Justice (Philosophy)Early works to 1800. I. Kremer, Mark, 1963II. Plato. Clitophon. English. III. Series.

B391.C53P57 2004

184dc22

2004000812

Printed in the United States of America

Picture 3 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information SciencesPermanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI/NISO Z39.481992.

To my mother and father

Table of Contents

PREFACE

A book about the Cleitophon is in need of an apology since it is by far the shortest of the Platonic dialoguesonly a few pages long. To judge it by its size, however, is to do it an injustice, yet it is the case that the current tradition of Platonic scholarship has proclaimed it as incomplete, inauthentic, or spurious. A book, therefore, is needed in order to restore the Cleitophon to its rightful place in the Platonic corpus. Slings book took a step in that direction, but he self-consciously avoided any attempt at a comprehensive interpretation of the meaning of the dialogue, whereas I am of the opinion that a presentation of the dialogues coherent meaning will do more to establish its authenticity and completeness than any philological study.

My main purpose is not, however, to debate the Platonic corpus. Having reflected on Nietzsches criticisms of Plato, I thought it necessary to discover a fresh Plato and so I turned to the Cleitophon because Cleitophons rejection of Socratic philosophy in the Republic seemed to me to have decisive similarities to Nietzsches. Furthermore, the aporetic character of the Cleitophon is remote from the metaphysical dogmatism with which Nietzsche painted Plato, and, therefore, the Cleitophon promised to provide a nondogmatic understanding of philosophy.

The understanding of philosophy portrayed by the Cleitophon is so far from being dogmatic that it is aware of itself as an awareness that cannot offer proof and that cannot even be understood by anyone other than those who have it or the potential for it. Philosophy is, therefore, not primarily reasoning but insight and it is the peculiar nature of the insight and the man capable of it that needs elaboration and characterization.

If I have failed in my attempt to discover a Socrates worthy of being Nietzsches antagonist and even critic, I am at least consoled by the nobility of the ambition and by the possibility that those more worthy of such an undertaking will follow.

My interpretive essay is an expanded version of an article that originally appeared in The Review of Politics. David Roochnik, Clifford Orwin, and Jan Blits were the first to revive the Cleitophon as a comprehensive work worthy of the deepest reflections. Their essays originally appeared in Ancient Philosophy, The Canadian Journal of Political Science, and Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy, respectively. I would like to thank the authors and the editors of the journals for their kind permission to reprint. I am also grateful to Naomi Lomba-Gomes and Meghan Gallagher for their generous and tireless assistance in assembling the manuscript.

Mark Kremer
December 2003

Part I

Introduction

Cleitophon

Interpretive Essay

INTRODUCTION

Western civilization depends upon the possibility of a life according to nature as opposed to tradition or to the authority of the gods. Socrates was the first to embody the possibility of a life according to nature, though there were philosophers before him who claimed to have discovered nature and who lived without traditional authority. But these pre-Socratic philosophers, of whom Socrates was one before becoming the Platonic Socrates, understood nature as material. Man, however, cannot live as either atom or element. The pre-Socratic philosophers were devoted to truth, yet such devotion is in conflict with the meaninglessness of materialism and proves that they could not live with their own understanding of nature. They were worshippers of the stone or men with scientific opinions but religious instincts that betrayed their science. Consequently there could be no pre-Socratic portrayal or defense of a life according to nature. Life and nature were in conflict with one another. This conflict meant that in order for man to live he had to either return to the belief in the gods or he had to understand nature in a manner that supported philosophy or the mind. Plato or his Socrates took the latter path and, therewith, founded the Western tradition of political philosophy.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Plato’s Cleitophon: On Socrates and the Modern Mind»

Look at similar books to Plato’s Cleitophon: On Socrates and the Modern Mind. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Plato’s Cleitophon: On Socrates and the Modern Mind»

Discussion, reviews of the book Plato’s Cleitophon: On Socrates and the Modern Mind and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.