• Complain

Steven M. Sanders - The philosophy of science fiction film

Here you can read online Steven M. Sanders - The philosophy of science fiction film full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Lexington, year: 2008, publisher: The University Press of Kentucky, genre: Art. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    The philosophy of science fiction film
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    The University Press of Kentucky
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2008
  • City:
    Lexington
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The philosophy of science fiction film: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The philosophy of science fiction film" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The science fiction genre maintains a remarkable hold on the imagination and enthusiasm of the filmgoing public, captivating large audiences worldwide and garnering ever-larger profits. Science fiction films entertain the possibility of time travel and extraterrestrial visitation and imaginatively transport us to worlds transformed by modern science and technology. They also provide a medium through which questions about personal identity, moral agency, artificial consciousness, and other categories of experience can be addressed. In The Philosophy of Science Fiction Film, distinguished authors explore the storylines, conflicts, and themes of fifteen science fiction film classics, from Metropolis to The Matrix. Editor Steven M. Sanders and a group of outstanding scholars in philosophy, film studies, and other fields raise science fiction film criticism to a new level by penetrating the surface of the films to expose the underlying philosophical arguments, ethical perspectives, and metaphysical views. Sanderss introduction presents an overview and evaluation of each essay and poses questions for readers to consider as they think about the films under discussion.The first section, Enigmas of Identity and Agency, deals with the nature of humanity as it is portrayed in Blade Runner, Dark City, Frankenstein, Invasion of the Body Snatchers, and Total Recall. In the second section, Extraterrestrial Visitation, Time Travel, and Artificial Intelligence, contributors discuss 2001: A Space Odyssey, The Terminator, 12 Monkeys, and The Day the Earth Stood Still and analyze the challenges of artificial intelligence, the paradoxes of time travel, and the ethics of war. The final section, Brave Newer World: Science Fiction Futurism, looks at visions of the future in Metropolis, The Matrix, Alphaville, and screen adaptations of George Orwells 1984.

Steven M. Sanders: author's other books


Who wrote The philosophy of science fiction film? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The philosophy of science fiction film — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The philosophy of science fiction film" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
The Philosophy of Popular Culture The books published in the Philosophy of - photo 1

The Philosophy of Popular Culture

The books published in the Philosophy of Popular Culture series will illuminate and explore philosophical themes and ideas that occur in popular culture. The goal of this series is to demonstrate how philosophical inquiry has been reinvigorated by increased scholarly interest in the intersection of popular culture and philosophy, as well as to explore through philosophical analysis beloved modes of entertainment, such as movies, TV shows, and music. Philosophical concepts will be made accessible to the general reader through examples in popular culture. This series seeks to publish both established and emerging scholars who will engage a major area of popular culture for philosophical interpretation and examine the philosophical underpinnings of its themes. Eschewing ephemeral trends of philosophical and cultural theory, authors will establish and elaborate on connections between traditional philosophical ideas from important thinkers and the ever-expanding world of popular culture.

Series Editor

Mark T. Conard, Marymount Manhattan College, NY

Books in the Series

The Philosophy of Stanley Kubrick, edited by Jerold J. Abrams

The Philosophy of Film Noir, edited by Mark T. Conard

The Philosophy of Martin Scorsese, edited by Mark T. Conard

The Philosophy of Neo-Noir, edited by Mark T. Conard

The Philosophy of The X-Files, edited by Dean A. Kowalski

The Philosophy of TV Noir, edited by Steven M. Sanders and Aeon J. Skoble

Basketball and Philosophy, edited by Jerry L. Walls and Gregory Bassham

Publication of this volume was made possible in part by a grant
from the National Endowment for the Humanities.

An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science Fiction Film and
Picturing Paranoia: Interpreting Invasion of the Body Snatchers
copyright 2008 by Steven M. Sanders

Copyright 2008 by The University Press of Kentucky

Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth,
serving Bellarmine University, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern
Kentucky University, The Filson Historical Society, Georgetown College,
Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University,
Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University, Transylvania University,
University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University.
All rights reserved.

Editorial and Sales Offices: The University Press of Kentucky
663 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4008
www.kentuckypress.com

11 10 09 08 07 5 4 3 2 1

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

The philosophy of science fiction film / edited by Steven M. Sanders.
p. cm.(The philosophy of popular culture)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-8131-2472-8 (hardcover : alk. paper)
1. Science fiction filmsHistory and criticism. I. Sanders, Steven, 1945
PN1995.9.S26P49 2008
791.43615dc22 2007038230

This book is printed on acid-free recycled paper meeting the requirements of the American
National Standard for Permanence in Paper for Printed Library Materials.

The philosophy of science fiction film - image 2

Manufactured in the United States of America.

The philosophy of science fiction film - image 3

Member of the Association of
American University Presses

PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The essays in this volume explore some of the ideas and possibilities that science fiction films take as their starting points. Since the essays are philosophical, they aim to increase readers understanding and appreciation by identifying the philosophical implications and assumptions of The Day the Earth Stood Still, Invasion of the Body Snatchers, The Terminator, and a dozen other science fiction film classics. The questions these films raise are addressed by philosophers, film theorists, and other scholars who take a variety of approaches and perspectives. No single method or school of thought predominates. Of course, there is a consensus among the contributors that intelligent and well-informed discussion of films can lead to greater appreciation and understanding of them. And each contributor would no doubt agree that it is desirable for readers to have a firsthand acquaintance with the film he or she has chosen to write about.

Aside from being asked to confine their choices to a short list, described in the introductory essay, contributors were free to treat science fiction films in any way that struck them as illuminating. Some contributors deployed a group of philosophical ideas around their choice of film. Others first selected a philosophical problem or theme, such as time travel, personal identity, or artificial intelligence, and then found a film that was particularly effective at dramatizing and developing the problem or theme in question. Although the essays implicate many areas of philosophy, including ethics, metaphysics, theory of knowledge, political philosophy, and aesthetics, readers who have had no previous exposure to philosophy will almost always be able to pick up the gist of the discussion, if not the finer points of detail. In addition, the introductory essay is designed to clarify the basic line of argument and point of view in each essay. All of the essays involve interpretive readings of the films, which means that they invite disagreement and reflection on the basis of that disagreement.

I am fortunate to have worked with colleagues who write about science fiction film so well. I thank them for their patience, hard work, and willingness to share their expertise. I am grateful to Mark T. Conard for developing the series that brings philosophy into such harmonious relationships with popular culture, to Eric Bronson and Michael L. Stephans for their helpful comments during the submission process, and to Christeen Clemens for our discussions of the book from its inception. Finally, I want to thank my editing supervisor, David L. Cobb, and my copyeditor, Anna Laura Bennett, for their valuable suggestions and meticulous correction of the manuscript.

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE PHILOSOPHY
OF SCIENCE FICTION FILM

Steven M. Sanders

Over the last decade there has been a significant shift in the attitudes of philosophers as they have become increasingly receptive to the opportunity to apply methods of philosophical inquiry to film, television, and other areas of popular culture. In fact, receptive is far too mild a word to describe the enthusiasm with which many philosophers now embrace popular culture. The authors of the essays included in this volume have genuine affection for science fiction feature films and the expertise to describe, explain, analyze, and evaluate the story lines, conflicts, and philosophically salient themes in them. Their contributions are designed to promote an understanding of the very considerable extent to which philosophy and science fiction are thematically interdependent insofar as science fiction provides materials for philosophical thinking about the logical possibility and paradoxes of time travel, the concept of personal identity and what it means to be human, the nature of consciousness and artificial intelligence, the moral implications of encounters with extraterrestrials, and the transformations of the future that will be brought about by science and technology. Of course, many science fiction films emphasize gadgets and special effects to the neglect of conceptual complexity, but the films discussed here engage viewers on the plane of ideas and provide occasions for historical, political, literary, and cultural commentary as well as philosophical analysis.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The philosophy of science fiction film»

Look at similar books to The philosophy of science fiction film. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The philosophy of science fiction film»

Discussion, reviews of the book The philosophy of science fiction film and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.