• Complain

Parker - Humble Pi a comedy of maths errors

Here you can read online Parker - Humble Pi a comedy of maths errors full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: UK, year: 2019, publisher: Penguin Books Ltd;Allen Lane, genre: Art. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Parker Humble Pi a comedy of maths errors
  • Book:
    Humble Pi a comedy of maths errors
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Penguin Books Ltd;Allen Lane
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2019
  • City:
    UK
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Humble Pi a comedy of maths errors: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Humble Pi a comedy of maths errors" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Humble Pi a comedy of maths errors — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Humble Pi a comedy of maths errors" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Matt Parker

HUMBLE Pi
A Comedy of Maths Errors
ALLEN LANE UK USA Canada Ireland Australia India New Zealand South - photo 1

ALLEN LANE

UK | USA | Canada | Ireland | Australia
India | New Zealand | South Africa

Allen Lane is part of the Penguin Random House group of companies whose addresses can be found at global.penguinrandomhouse.com.

First published 2019 Copyright Matt Parker 2019 The moral right of the author - photo 2

First published 2019

Copyright Matt Parker, 2019

The moral right of the author has been asserted

Cover image: Emilija Manevska/Getty Images

ISBN: 978-0-141-98913-6

This ebook is copyright material and must not be copied, reproduced, transferred, distributed, leased, licensed or publicly performed or used in any way except as specifically permitted in writing by the publishers, as allowed under the terms and conditions under which it was purchased or as strictly permitted by applicable copyright law. Any unauthorized distribution or use of this text may be a direct infringement of the authors and publishers rights and those responsible may be liable in law accordingly.

ZERO
Introduction

In 1995 Pepsi ran a promotion where people could collect Pepsi Points and then trade them in for Pepsi Stuff. A T-shirt was 75 points, sunglasses were 175 points and there was even a leather jacket for 1,450 points. Wearing all three at once would get you some serious 90s points. The TV commercial where they advertised the points-for-stuff concept featured someone doing exactly that.

But the people making the commercial wanted to end it on some zany bit of classic Pepsi craziness. So wearing the T-shirt, shades and leather jacket, the ad protagonist flies his Harrier Jet to school. Apparently, this military aircraft could be yours for 7 million Pepsi Points.

The joke is simple enough: they took the idea behind Pepsi Points and extrapolated it until it was ridiculous. Solid comedy writing. But then they seemingly didnt do the maths. Seven million sure does sound like a big number, but I dont think the team creating the ad bothered to run the numbers and check it was definitely big enough.

But someone else did. At the time, each AV-8 Harrier II Jump Jet brought into action cost the United States Marine Corps over $20 million and, thankfully, there is a simple way to convert between USD and PP: Pepsi would let anyone buy additional points for 10 cents each. Now, Im not familiar with the market for second-hand military aircraft, but a price of $700,000 on a $20 million aircraft sounds like a good investment. As it did to John Leonard, who tried to cash in on this.

And it was not just a lame tried. He went all in. The promotion required that people claimed with an original order form from the Pepsi Stuff catalogue, traded a minimum of fifteen original Pepsi Points and included a cheque to cover the cost of any additional points required, plus $10 for shipping and handling. John did all of that. He used an original form, he collected fifteen points from Pepsi products and he put $700,008.50 into escrow with his attorneys to back the cheque. The guy actually raised the money! He was serious.

Pepsi initially refused his claim: The Harrier jet in the Pepsi commercial is fanciful and is simply included to create a humorous and entertaining ad. But Leonard was already lawyered up and ready to fight. His attorneys fired back with This is a formal demand that you honor your commitment and make immediate arrangements to transfer the new Harrier jet to our client. Pepsi didnt budge. Leonard sued, and it went to court.

The case involved a lot of discussion over whether the commercial in question was obviously a joke or if someone could conceivably take it seriously. The official notes from the judge acknowledge how ridiculous this is about to become: Plaintiffs insistence that the commercial appears to be a serious offer requires the Court to explain why the commercial is funny. Explaining why a joke is funny is a daunting task.

But they give it a go!

The teenagers comment that flying a Harrier Jet to school sure beats the bus evinces an improbably insouciant attitude toward the relative difficulty and danger of piloting a fighter plane in a residential area, as opposed to taking public transportation.

No school would provide landing space for a students fighter jet, or condone the disruption the jets use would cause.

In light of the Harrier Jets well-documented function in attacking and destroying surface and air targets, armed reconnaissance and air interdiction, and offensive and defensive anti-aircraft warfare, depiction of such a jet as a way to get to school in the morning is clearly not serious.

Leonard never got his jet and Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc. is now a part of legal history. I, personally, find it reassuring that, if I say anything which I characterize as zany humor, there is legal precedent to protect me from people who take it seriously. And if anyone has a problem with that, simply collect enough Parker Points for a free photo of me not caring (postage and handling charges may apply).

Pepsi took active steps to protect itself from future problems and re-released the ad with the Harrier increased in value to 700 million Pepsi Points. I find it amazing that they did not choose this big number in the first place. Its not like 7 million was funnier; the company just didnt bother to do the maths when choosing an arbitrary large number.

As humans, we are not good at judging the size of large numbers. And even when we know one is bigger than another, we dont appreciate the size of the difference. I had to go on the BBC News in 2012 to explain how big a trillion is. The UK debt had just gone over 1 trillion and they wheeled me out to explain that that is a big number. Apparently, shouting, Its really big, now back to you in the studio! was insufficient, so I had to give an example.

I went with my favourite method of comparing big numbers to time. We know a million, a billion and a trillion are different sizes, but we often dont appreciate the staggering increases between them. A million seconds from now is just shy of eleven days and fourteen hours. Not so bad. I could wait that long. Its within two weeks. A billion seconds is over thirty-one years.

A trillion seconds from now is after the year 33700 CE .

Those surprising numbers actually make perfect sense after a moments thought. Million, billion and trillion are each a thousand times bigger than each other. A million seconds is roughly a third of a month, so a billion seconds is on the order of 330 (a third of a thousand) months. And if a billion is around thirty-one years, then of course a trillion is around 31,000 years.

During our lives we learn that numbers are linear; that the spaces between them are all the same. If you count from one to nine, each number is one more than the previous one. If you ask someone what number is halfway between one and nine, they will say five but only because they have been taught to. Wake up, sheeple! Humans instinctively perceive numbers logarithmically, not linearly. A young child or someone who has not been indoctrinated by education will place three halfway between one and nine.

Three is a different kind of middle. Its the logarithmic middle, which means its a middle with respect to multiplication rather than addition. 1 3 = 3. 3 3 = 9. You can go from one to nine either by adding equal steps of four or multiplying by equal steps of three. So the multiplication middle is three, and that is what humans do by default, until we are taught otherwise.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Humble Pi a comedy of maths errors»

Look at similar books to Humble Pi a comedy of maths errors. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Humble Pi a comedy of maths errors»

Discussion, reviews of the book Humble Pi a comedy of maths errors and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.