• Complain

Donald Lazere - Thinking Critically About Media and Politics

Here you can read online Donald Lazere - Thinking Critically About Media and Politics full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: London, year: 2012, publisher: Routledge, genre: Art / Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Donald Lazere Thinking Critically About Media and Politics
  • Book:
    Thinking Critically About Media and Politics
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Routledge
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2012
  • City:
    London
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Thinking Critically About Media and Politics: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Thinking Critically About Media and Politics" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

This book offers a critical introduction to the media as well as a self defense against the spin of politicians, advertising, and assorted propagandists. Its interdisciplinary application of principles of critical thinking and argumentative rhetoric can be incorporated into a diverse range of college courses, including communication, journalism, rhetoric, and media criticism.
Lazere offers a basic guide to and critique of the semantic complexities of terms such as liberal, conservative, left, and right, as well as related words like democracy, freedom, capitalism, and socialism. He provides student guides for understanding opposing viewpoints between conservative and liberal polemicists on controversial issues in current politics and media, such as the nations wealth gap, including the rhetoric of economic arguments and the use and interpretation of statistics. His book offers insights into understanding the positions behind many other well-publicized debates in American societyfrom womens rights to racial attitudes to the role of government. Lazere provides students with tools for understanding and argumentation, showing how to recognize logical fallacies, verbal slanting, and emotional appeal through connotative languageand how to discern intentions behind political and other advertisements.
In contrast to most textbooks approach to logical fallacies that assumes they result only from unintentional lapses in reasoning, this book confronts the hard truth that real-life arguments frequently are tainted by deliberate deception. Chapter 3 surveys various influences on political bias in the media, while Chapter 4 examines special pleading, conflicts of interest, invective, smearing, and hypeas propagated by sources like lobbies, public relations agencies, think tanks, advocacy, and political advertising.

Donald Lazere: author's other books


Who wrote Thinking Critically About Media and Politics? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Thinking Critically About Media and Politics — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Thinking Critically About Media and Politics" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
THINKING CRITICALLY ABOUT MEDIA AND POLITICS
THINKING CRITICALLY ABOUT MEDIA AND POLITICS
Donald Lazere
First published 2013 by Paradigm Publishers Published 2016 by Routledge 2 Park - photo 1
First published 2013 by Paradigm Publishers
Published 2016 by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
Copyright 2013, Taylor & Francis.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Notice:
Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Lazere, Donald.
Thinking critically about media and politics / Donald Lazere.
pages cm
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-61205-273-1 (hardcover: alk. paper)
1. Mass mediaPolitical aspectsUnited States. 2. Press and politicsUnited States. 3. Critical thinkingUnited States. I. Title.
P95.82.U6L39 2013
302.230973dc23
2012046075
ISBN 13: 978-1-61205-273-1 (hbk)
ISBN 13: 978-1-61205-274-8 (pbk)
__________
Contents
_____________
* On the web at www.paradigmpublishers.com/Books/BookDetail.aspx?productID=321369
__________
Our culture places huge value on physical fitness. The media are filled every day with ads for building muscles or working off fat, and with dramatic images of self-defense. There are not many ads for, or dramatizations of, building our mental muscles, reducing the fat in our brain, or defending ourselves in argumentation. Shouldnt we be able to fight back against those trying to take verbal and intellectual advantage of us? This book is a survival guide for self-defense against manipulation by political, commercial, and other varieties of propaganda, as communicated through mass media.
The book is a spin-off of Reading and Writing for Civic Literacy: The Critical Citizens Guide to Argumentative Rhetoric, a textbook primarily for the second term of first-year English classes or a more advanced course in argumentative writing. This version places less emphasis on the writing dimension and formal exposition of rhetorical terminology, in the hope that it will be useful in a wider range of college courses, including the social sciences, journalism, communications, and media criticismin which it could be read either as a central text or as a supplement to more discipline-specific books. Exercises at the end of sections stimulate thought, discussion, research, and writing assignments. Because much of the analysis of political arguments throughout the book emphasizes common fallacies in reasoning, the Appendix contains a glossary of logical fallacies, and the terms in that list are boldfaced throughout the text.
In recent years, best-seller lists have been filled with liberal and conservative polemics like Ann Coulters Slander: Liberal Lies about the American Right and Al Frankens Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right. This phenomenon recalls George Orwells judgment in Politics and the English Language: In our age, there is no such thing as keeping out of politics. All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred and schizophrenia (Orwells Nineteen Eighty-Four, 256). Especially with the proliferation in the past few decades of partisan media of news and commentary on TV, radio, and the Internet, many Americans have been able to expose themselves only to sources of information that they already agree with and to shut out any contradictory viewpoints. (Even the most highly educated, scrupulous thinkers are innately captive to egocentric and ethnocentric biases on public controversies, needing to struggle constantly against those biases.) Those on the right and left shrilly accuse the other side of diabolically deceptive, monopolistic control of American politics, media, culture, and education, while portraying their own side as powerless, persecuted, and wholly virtuous. All sides claim to have irrefutable evidence proving they are telling the truth and their opponents are lying. So what are we to make of this dizzying, vicious circle of accusation? How can we possibly distinguish truth-tellers from liars?
This book aims to approach these questions through the application of principles of critical thinking and argumentative rhetoricdefined as the study of elements and patterns of persuasion, both scrupulous and unscrupulous ones (though popular usage tends to equate rhetoric solely with the latter). This approach to critical thinking and rhetoric also draws heavily from the study of semanticsemphasizing the role in argumentation of definition or denotation of terms, verbal slanting, and emotional appeal through connotative language, what I term cleans and dirties. For example, compare the different connotative spins in two responses to a 2007 U.S. Treasury Department report on trends in income mobility in America during the previous decade. An editorial in the conservative Wall Street Journal said, Of those in the second lowest income quintile, nearly 50% moved into the middle quintile or higher. This is a stunning show of upward mobility, meaning that more than half of all lower-income Americans in 1996 had moved up the income scale in only 10 years. But liberal columnist Eugene Robinson in the Washington Post, looking at the same figures, wrote, An incredible 42 percent of children born into that lowest quintile are still stuck at the bottom, having been unable to climb a single rung of the income ladder.
Semantic misunderstandings constantly result from liberals and conservatives different subjective viewpoints on, definitions of, and connotative spins on, the very words liberal and conservative, as well as related words like capitalism, socialism, and democracy. President Obama was widely identified by conservatives in polls as a socialist, communist, or Marxist, although such polls rarely asked the respondents how they defined those terms or what evidence justified them. At the same time, many liberals were denouncing Obama for selling out to Wall Street capitalists and for continuing the same conservative policies as President Bush on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, national security, and domestic surveillance. approaches such semantic misunderstandings by presenting a glossary of political terms like these in all their complexities, ambiguities, and points of disagreement; the aim is to arrive at definitions that are agreed on by both liberals and conservatives, or leftists and rightists, so that they can at least agree about what they disagree about. Semantic study also emphasizes the open-ended nature of controversies between, say, conservatives and liberals. The journal of the Institute for General Semantics is titled et cetera, reflecting the principle that there is rarely any last word in such controversies but only a continuous sequence of rebuttals and counter-rebuttals. So at several points in the book students are asked explicitly or implicitly to try to find arguments that refute the arguments presented here.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Thinking Critically About Media and Politics»

Look at similar books to Thinking Critically About Media and Politics. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Thinking Critically About Media and Politics»

Discussion, reviews of the book Thinking Critically About Media and Politics and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.