von David C. Parker und Holger Strutwolf
Rodolphe Kasser, Papyrus Bodmer III: vangile de Jean et Gense I-IV, 2 en Boharique, vol. 178, Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium (Louvain: Secrtariat du CSCO, 1958). |
Christian Askeland, Johns Gospel: the Coptic translations of its Greek text, Arbeiten zur neutesta mentichen Textforschung (Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, 2012), 168. |
Ibid., 169. |
Kasser, Bodmer III, VIIXIII. |
Prolgomnes un Essai de Classification Systmatique des Dialectes et Subdialectes Coptes selon les Critres de la Phontique, III, Systmes Orthographiques et Catgories Dialectales, Muson 94 (1981): 92. |
See for example, Barbara Aland et al., eds., Novum Testamentum Graece, 28th ed. (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2012), 73*. |
See for example, Askeland, Johns Gospel: the Coptic translations of its Greek text, 16874. |
See for example, Kasser, Prolgomnes, 92; Wolf-Peter Funk, Dialects Wanting Homes: a Numerical Approach to the Early Varieties of Coptic, in Historical Dialectology: Regional and Social, ed. Jacek Fisiak, Trends in linguistics Studies and monographs (Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1988), 156. |
For a more detailed explanation see Kasser, Prolgomnes, 92. |
Bohairic, in The Coptic Encyclopedia, ed. Aziz Suryal Atiya (New York: Macmillan, 1991). |
See for example John 10:40 (F 37v line 9), 10:42 (F 37v line14), 11:31 (F 39v line 20), 11:54 (F 41v line 8), 12:2 F 42r line 7), 19:29 (F 65r line 10). |
Rodolphe Kasser, LEvangile Selon Saint Jean et les Versions Coptes de la Bible (Neuchatel: Delachoux and Niestle, 1966), 3941. |
Le Papyrus Bodmer III Rexamin: Amlioration de sa Transcription, Journal of Coptic Studies 3 (2001). |
These data come with the assistance of Rick D. Bennett Jr., the Director of Content Development with Accordance/OakTree Software. Inc. I have confirmed his data using Logos Bible software as well. |
Aland et al., NA 28, Forward. |
Ibid., 333. |
See F 36r line 22. |
F 14v line 6. |
For a complete list of problematic citations in the NA28 of P. Bodmer III please see appendix 2. |
Ce papyrus (papyrus Bodmer II) et le ntre (papyrus Bodmer III) partie dun lot de documents coptes et grecs qui, offerts en bloc la Bodmeriana, furent acquis par celle-ci sans que la provenance exacte en ait encore t rvle. On a dit que toutes ces pices avaient t trouves ensemble, sans la Haute gypte, et quil sagissait dune bibliothque prive. Nous nen connaissons pas davantage. Kasser, Bodmer III, III. |
James M. Robinson, The Story of the Bodmer Papyri: From the First Monasterys Library in Upper Egypt to Geneva and Dublin (Eugene, Oregon: Cascade Books, 2011), 128. |
Ibid., 151. |
Ibid., 155. |
It should be noted that Kasser did not agree with Robinsons conclusions. See for example Rodolphe Kasser, Bodmer Papyri, in The Coptic Encyclopedia, ed. Aziz Suryal Atiya (New York: MacMillan, 1991); for Robinsons response to some of Kassers views see Robinson, Bodmer Papyri, 175; For more information about the Pachomian libraries and possible ties to discoveries from this area, see Hugo Lundhaug and Lance Jenott, The Monastic Origins of the Nag Hammadi Codices, Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum, (Tbingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2015). |
Robinson, Bodmer Papyri, 155. |
James M. Robinson, Richard Smith, and Coptic Gnostic Library Project., The Nag Hammadi Library in English, 3rd completely rev. ed. (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1988), 14. |
Kasser, Bodmer III, iii. |
Ibid. |
Robinson, Smith, and Project., The Nag Hammadi Library in English, 14. |
Rodolphe Kasser, Papyrus Bodmer XVIII: Deuteronome I-X,7 en sahidique, Bibliotheca Bodmeriana (Cologny-Genve: Bibliothque Bodmer, 1962), 8. |
Bodmer III, iv. |
Eric G. Turner, The Typology of the Early Codex, The Eighteenth publication in the Haney Foundation series, University of Pennsylvania ([Philadelphia]: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1977), 18. |
Ibid., 24.There are some manuscripts in this section from the vi and vii centuries, but those are longer at 24.5 and 22.5 cm in length respectively. |
Kasser, Bodmer III, ii. |
There has been some evidence that some early Christian scribes may have been female. That is certainly a possiblity for the scribe of P. Bodmer III. For the sake of simplicity and clarity for the reader, however, I will refer to the scribe as male. See Kim Haines-Eitzen, Guardians of Letters: Literacy, Power, and the Transmitters of Early Christian Literature (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 4152. |
See folios 22r and 22v both numbered folios 38r and 38v both labeled or folio 43v and 44r both labeled Also see the pagination section of this introduction for further explanation about the pagination habits of the scribe. |
Kasser, Rexamin, 84. |
See F 28v. |
Kasser, Rexamin, 87. |
See the discussion of P. Bodmer II in Turner, The Typology of the Early Codex, 70. Regardless of whether one accepts Martins order or Turners proposal for the makeup of P. Bodmer II, either way it is a codex of quires of varying length. |
See F 25r line 7; F 27r line 14; F 27r line 15; F 33r line 22; F 33v line 1; F 34r line 16; F 35r line 22; F 37r line 17; F 38r line 14; F 38v line 21; F 38v line 22; F 41r line 4; F 41r line 5; F 41r line 13; F 42r line 14; F 42 v line 14; F 45r line 1; F 48v line 2: F 48v line 3; F 49r line 8; F 50v line 8; F 35r line 9; F 35r line 10; F 54r line 21; F 56r line 18; F 57r line 9; F 59r line 1; F 60v line 8; F 64v line 19; F 72r line 20; F 72 v line 12; F 73r line 11. |
Kasser, Bodmer III, iii. |
Rexamin, 85. |
Kasser suggests that are not visible but they are. |
Error made by scribe in pagination. |
Error in pagination made by scribe. |
This page written in a different hand. |
Error made by scribe. |
Kasser, Rexamin, 8687. Kasser incorrectly labels as horizontal and as vertical. Not only is this clearly wrong when looking at the fibers of the manuscript but it does not even make sense in Kassers own list. Since |