• Complain

Juanzi Li Guilin Qi Dongyan Zhao Wolfgang Nejdl - Semantic Web and Web Science

Here you can read online Juanzi Li Guilin Qi Dongyan Zhao Wolfgang Nejdl - Semantic Web and Web Science full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: New York, publisher: Springer, genre: Computer. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Juanzi Li Guilin Qi Dongyan Zhao Wolfgang Nejdl Semantic Web and Web Science

Semantic Web and Web Science: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Semantic Web and Web Science" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

This book constitutes the refereed post-proceedings of the Joint International Semantic Technology Conference, JIST 2011, held in Hangzhou, China, in December 2011. This conference is a joint event for regional semantic Web related conferences. JIST 2011 brings together the Asian Semantic Web Conference 2011 and the Chinese Semantic Web Conference 2011. The 21 revised full papers presented together with 12 short papers were carefully reviewed and selected from 82 submissions. The papers cover a wide range of topics in disciplines related to semantic technology including applications of the semantic Web, management of semantic Web data, ontology and reasoning, social semantic Web, and user interfaces to the semantic Web.

Juanzi Li Guilin Qi Dongyan Zhao Wolfgang Nejdl: author's other books


Who wrote Semantic Web and Web Science? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Semantic Web and Web Science — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Semantic Web and Web Science" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Juanzi Li , Guilin Qi , Dongyan Zhao , Wolfgang Nejdl and Hai-Tao Zheng (eds.) Springer Proceedings in Complexity Semantic Web and Web Science 2013 10.1007/978-1-4614-6880-6_1 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013
Enhancing Software Search with Semantic Information from Wikipedia
Xiaoli Ma 1
(1)
Intelligent Computing Lab, Division of Informatics, Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, 518055, Peoples Republic of China
Xiaoli Ma
Email:
Bo Yuan (Corresponding author)
Email:
Abstract
Software is becoming ubiquitous, from desktop computers to smart phones, and has created significant impact on the quality of our everyday life. Sharing and reusing high-quality software can save tremendous amount of time and efforts that otherwise would need to be reinvented. The challenge is how to efficiently search through a potentially huge database of software and return the most relevant results. In this paper, we present a prototype of semantic software search engine that exploits the semantic information from Wikipedia, one of the largest online knowledge repositories as the result of collaborative intelligence. We propose a technique to replace the original concept space by an extended concept space extracted from Wikipedia to incorporate commonsense knowledge into software search. Experimental results show that this strategy can achieve better performance over traditional software search based on the original concept space.
Introduction
To facilitate the sharing of software applications across diverse disciplines, it is often desirable to develop a mechanism to automatically collect software distributed on the Web and make them easily accessible by users. Currently, the most widely used method is keyword matching. However, understanding precisely the intention of users based on search keywords still remains as a major challenge. Fortunately, recent studies in semantics show that semantics can help extend our understanding of the original content. For example, by using ontology in search, especially in organizing resources and understanding search words, search engines can better understand the meaning of various concepts and produce more targeted outputs [].
Previous studies show that good correlation between computed relatedness scores and human judgments can be achieved by using vectors of Wikipedia].
In this paper, we employed similar ideas in software search by using Wikipedia-based concept vectors to specify software applications. A semantic index is also built using this concept space. With the help of this fusion strategy, information from multiple sources can be unified to achieve a more complete understanding towards a specific software application, compared to its original description information. During the search process, the relatedness between software applications (represented as concept vectors) is calculated to rank the search results.
The contribution of this paper is twofold. First, we presented extended concept space construction (ECSC), a novel approach to forming an extended semantic representation of the original concept based on Wikipedia. This method can be also applied to other tasks requiring semantic information without building a comprehensive semantic system. Second, we applied ECSC in the task of software search and achieved promising results compared to traditional software search engines in terms of the consistency with the search results produced by human users.
The rest part of this paper is organized as follows. The strategy for extending the concept space of software for indexing and semantic search is detailed in Sect. with some directions for future work.
Semantic Search Using ECSC
It is well known that useful semantic information can be extracted by analyzing the log files of search engines to provide better search services. However, in many cases, the log files are not made accessible to the public. Instead, a more practical approach is to use publically available knowledge resources such as Wikipedia to acquire the semantic information to improve the search experience. More specifically, given a software description, a concept space (a vector of concepts) is constructed to represent its essential attributes (e.g., what each term is about and what it is).
For example, the description of Weka (Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis) may read as A suite of machine learning software developed by the Machine Learning Group at University of Waikato, containing a collection of popular machine learning algorithms for data mining tasks. Ideally, a user that is interested in a certain data mining algorithm should be able to retrieve this software record using the name of the algorithm or even its alias as the keyword, even if it does not explicitly appear in the original description. In other words, the software search engine should be able to achieve a more general understanding of the software on top of its existing description.
In Wikipedia, each article is treated as a concept and each concept is represented by a vector of words that occur in the article. The strength of association between words and concepts can be computed by WLVM (Wikipedia Link Vector Model) [ contains an implementation of WLVM, which was used in our work to compute the relatedness between concepts.
Using ECSC, each software application is annotated as a set of concepts (original concept space) and each concept is mapped into a weighted sequence of Wikipedia concepts ordered by their relevance (i.e., use Wikipedia concepts to augment the bag of concepts that represent the software) using WikipediaMiner. Concepts with low levels of relatedness are discarded. Finally, all sets of concepts are merged into a vector of concepts (extended concept space) as the new software description. When searching for software, the semantic relatedness between two software applications is calculated by comparing their vectors of concepts, for example, using the cosine metric. In the meantime, with the help of ECSC, for the same input keyword, it is now possible to retrieve software records that are closely related but otherwise would not have been possible to be retrieved. The overall process of ECSC is shown in Fig..
Fig 1 A diagram of the overall process of ECSC To demonstrate how our - photo 1
Fig. 1
A diagram of the overall process of ECSC
To demonstrate how our approach works, the top 10 individual Wikipedia concepts most relevant to a given concept (e.g., SVM and Bayesian probability) is shown in Table a Python open source machine learning library.
Table 1
The top 10 concepts most relevant to SVM and Bayesian probability
#
SVM
Bayesian probability
Statistical classification
Bayes theorem
Decision tree learning
Frequency probability
Nave Bayes classifier
Prior probability
Supervised learning
Decision theory
Perceptron
Principle of indifference
Linear classifier
Probability interpretations
Kernel methods
Statistical inference
Multiclass classification
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Semantic Web and Web Science»

Look at similar books to Semantic Web and Web Science. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Semantic Web and Web Science»

Discussion, reviews of the book Semantic Web and Web Science and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.