• Complain

Gaius Julius Caesar - The Conquest of Gaul

Here you can read online Gaius Julius Caesar - The Conquest of Gaul full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 1983, publisher: Penguin Group, genre: Detective and thriller. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover

The Conquest of Gaul: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Conquest of Gaul" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The enemy were overpowered and took to flight. The Romans pursued as far as their strength enabled them to run Between 58 and 50 BC Julius Caesar conquered most of the area now covered by France, Belgium and Switzerland, and invaded Britain twice, and The Conquest of Gaul is his record of these campaigns. Caesars narrative offers insights into his military strategy and paints a fascinating picture of his encounters with the inhabitants of Gaul and Britain, as well as lively portraits of the rebel leader Vercingetorix and other Gallic chieftains. The Conquest of Gaulcan also be read as a piece of political propaganda, as Caesar sets down his version of events for the Roman public, knowing he faces civil war on his return to Rome. Revised and updated by Jane Gardner, S. A. Handfords translation brings Caesars lucid and exciting account to life for modern readers. This volume includes a glossary of persons and places, maps, appendices and suggestions for further reading.

Gaius Julius Caesar: author's other books


Who wrote The Conquest of Gaul? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Conquest of Gaul — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Conquest of Gaul" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Table of Contents THE CONQUEST OF GAUL ADVISORY EDITOR BETTY RADICE - photo 1
Table of Contents

THE CONQUEST OF GAUL ADVISORY EDITOR BETTY RADICE GAIUS JULIUS CAESAR was - photo 2
THE CONQUEST OF GAUL
ADVISORY EDITOR: BETTY RADICE
GAIUS JULIUS CAESAR was born in 100 B.C. into an ancient patrician family. He was an adolescent during the period of the proscription of Marius (his fathers brother-in-law), the dictatorship of Sulla and the early career of Pompey. His family were traditionally against the patrician senatorial oligarchy, and Caesar followed suit. He was imprisoned for a short time by Sulla, but managed to maintain good relations with the nobles for ten years after his release; his was even co-opted into the college of priests (73 B.C.). During the sixties, he advanced through the senatorial cursus to the rank of praetor, while supporting the popular side in politics. In 60 B.C. he formed with Pompey and Crassus the combination known to us as the first triumvirate, to overcome conservative senatorial opposition, and he was elected consul for 59 B.C. He was then created governor of Transalpine Gaul, a task which was to occupy him for nine years. He had left the two triumvirs to safeguard his interests in Rome but had to meet them at Ravenna and Lucca in 56 B.C. to renew their agreement. Pompey was appointed sole consul in 52 B.C. after the death of Crassus, which resulted in civil war and the defeat of the Pompeian faction in Spain (45 B.C.). Caesar came back to Rome as dictator. He tried to improve conditions for the roman citizen and increase the honesty and efficiency of the government. His dictatorship was declared perpetual in February 44 B.C., but his many bitter enemies hatched a conspiracy and assassinated him in March 44 B.C.

s. A. HANDFORD was born at Manchester in 1898 and educated at Bradford Grammar School and at Balliol College, Oxford, where he took a double first in Classics. He was a Lecturer in Swansea, and Lecturer and Reader at Kings College, London. He published several books on classical subjects, and translated Caesar, Sallust and Aesop for the Penguin Classics. He died in October 1978.

JANE GARDNER was born in 1934, and has degrees in Classics from Glasgow and Oxford Universities. She is a Professor of Ancient History at the University of Reading. Her publications include Women in Roman Law and Society (1986), Being a Roman Citizen (1993), Family and Familia in Roman Law and Life (1998) and a translation of Caesars The Civil War for Penguin Classics.
INTRODUCTION 1 Roman politics in the late Republic Gaius Julius Caesar spent - photo 3
INTRODUCTION
1 Roman politics in the late Republic
Gaius Julius Caesar spent nine years - almost a sixth of his entire life and more than a third of his life as a member of the Senate - away from Rome, campaigning in Gaul. Half-way through, the military command he held was extended for a further five-year period. Political necessity, rather than military or than his personal irreplaceability in command, required that he continue in post. His victories had already been awarded public thanksgivings of unprecedented length in Rome; nevertheless, to resume private status would have meant political suicide - at the least, exile.
Politics at Rome was personal and factional, its significant operation confined within the membership of the Senate. Constitutionally, Rome was a Republic, with the legislative and electoral sovereignty vested in popular assemblies. In practice, control of government was in the hands of the Senate, itself made up of past and present holders of public office, and the effective policy-making body, although technically it was merely advisory to the magistrates. Before the birth of Caesar, there had been two major developments which had fundamentally changed the character of Roman politics. The Gracchi had shown that the sovereign power of the people could be used to break the Senates de facto control of government. However, they had no armed power with which to defend themselves against the senators reaction. Marius military innovations produced an army for whom soldiering was a means of earning a livelihood and - in the absence of a service gratuities commission - its commander the person to whom the soldiers looked to secure some provision for them on demobilization. Both became factors in the internal power struggles in the Senate. The tribunate was used as a means of proposing or blocking legislation whose popular provisions often were - or could be alleged to be - a mere bait for the electorate and a cover for ulterior personal power-seeking. The acquisition of a military command brought with it the opportunity to gain wealth, patronage, electoral support and armed power. Sulla, who himself seized power by force of arms after a civil war, attempted to forestall any repetition of such events by a programme of legislation which regulated the cursus honorum the sequence of magisterial offices - expanded the judicial system and put it under exclusive senatorial control, and imposed restrictions on the powers of the tribunes. Within less than a decade, virtually his entire construction had been either dismantled or ignored.
One of the prime agents in this was Pompey, whose own consulship in 70 B.C. flouted Sullan regulations - he was below the legal minimum age and had held none of the qualifying offices. A few years later, he gained in rapid succession, through tribunician legislation, two military commands - that against the pirates in 67, followed the next year by a command in Asia Minor for the pursuit of the war against Mithridates.
Meanwhile, his former consular colleague and rival, Crassus, made various attempts to strengthen his own position at Rome and there are good grounds for believing that Caesar was one of the rising politicians to whom he lent support. By family connection (he was a nephew by marriage of Marius), as well it would seem as by personal bent, Caesar favoured the popular line in politics. He had backed Pompeys rescinding of Sullan measures and supported the proposal to give him the Asiatic command. Cicero hints very strongly that he and Crassus were intended to be the chief beneficiaries of an agrarian commission which, if set up, would have created a group of officials holding military commands and with vast powers of patronage through the acquisition and distribution of land. His name was also linked with the failed popularis Catiline, whom Cicero has deluded subsequent generations into regarding as little better than a psychopath.
By 62 B.C., however, Caesar had had little success in his political ventures, though his career had advanced as far as the praetorship. As well as the matters already mentioned, he had in the mid sixties sponsored a series of abortive prosecutions against persons involved in the violence associated with the overthrow of Saturninus and with the Sullan proscriptions. His aim is uncertain but may have been to try to alert the Romans to the danger of leaving unresolved the question of the permissibility of the procedures by which, since the Gracchi, summary force had on several occasions been used by the State to deal with political opposition.
In 62 B.C. Pompey returned from the East and to general surprise disbanded his armies and returned to private life. With his troops, however, he found that he also gave up his influence with the Senate. Delays and excuses were interposed to the ratification of his Eastern settlement and the provision of land grants for his veterans. Cicero had hoped that political strife at Rome might be terminated by securing cooperation and recognition of common interest, a harmony of the orders, between the ruling elite, the Senate, and the non-senatorial wealthy class, the equestrian order (or knights), with Pompey as the leader and rallying-point acceptable to both.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Conquest of Gaul»

Look at similar books to The Conquest of Gaul. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Conquest of Gaul»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Conquest of Gaul and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.