• Complain

Gustav Niebuhr - Lincolns Bishop: A President, a Priest, and the Fate of 300 Dakota Sioux Warriors

Here you can read online Gustav Niebuhr - Lincolns Bishop: A President, a Priest, and the Fate of 300 Dakota Sioux Warriors full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2014, publisher: HarperOne, genre: Detective and thriller. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Lincolns Bishop: A President, a Priest, and the Fate of 300 Dakota Sioux Warriors
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    HarperOne
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2014
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Lincolns Bishop: A President, a Priest, and the Fate of 300 Dakota Sioux Warriors: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Lincolns Bishop: A President, a Priest, and the Fate of 300 Dakota Sioux Warriors" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

In the tradition of Doris Kearns Goodwins Team of Rivals comes Gustav Niebuhrs compelling history of Abraham Lincolns decision in 1862 to spare the lives of 265 condemned Sioux men, and the Episcopal bishop who was his moral compass, helping guide the presidents conscience.

More than a century ago, during the formative years of the American nation, Protestant churches carried powerful moral authority, giving voice to values such as mercy and compassion, while boldly standing against injustice and immorality. Gustav Niebuhr travels back to this defining period, to explore Abraham Lincolns decision to spare the lives of 265 Sioux men sentenced to die by a military tribunal in Minnesota for warfare against white settlerswhile allowing the hanging of 38 others, the largest single execution on American soil. Popular opinion favored death or expulsion. Only one state leader championed the cause of the Native Americans, Episcopal bishop, Henry Benjamin Whipple.

Though hed never met an Indian until he was 37 years old, Whipple befriended them before the massacre and understood their plight at the hands of corrupt government officials and businessmen. After their trial, he pleaded with Lincoln to extend mercy and implement true justice. Bringing to life this little known event and this extraordinary man, Niebuhr pays tribute to the once amazing moral force of mainline Protestant churches and the practitioners who guarded Americas conscience.

Lincolns Bishop is illustrated with 16 pages of black-and-white photos.

Gustav Niebuhr: author's other books


Who wrote Lincolns Bishop: A President, a Priest, and the Fate of 300 Dakota Sioux Warriors? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Lincolns Bishop: A President, a Priest, and the Fate of 300 Dakota Sioux Warriors — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Lincolns Bishop: A President, a Priest, and the Fate of 300 Dakota Sioux Warriors" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
To Margaret Contents Abraham Lincoln 1865 courtesy of the Universal - photo 1
To Margaret Contents Abraham Lincoln 1865 courtesy of the Universal - photo 2
To Margaret
Contents
Abraham Lincoln 1865 courtesy of the Universal History ArchiveUIGThe - photo 3
Abraham Lincoln, 1865
{courtesy of the Universal History Archive/UIG/The Bridgeman Art Library}
Henry Benjamin Whipple 1859 courtesy of the Library of Congress Brady-Hardy - photo 4
Henry Benjamin Whipple, 1859
{courtesy of the Library of Congress, Brady-Hardy Photograph Collection}
Little Crow 1862 courtesy of the Library of Congress I FIRST HEARD ABOUT - photo 5
Little Crow, 1862
{courtesy of the Library of Congress}
I FIRST HEARD ABOUT HENRY B. WHIPPLE WHEN I HAPPENED to be a few miles from his birthplace in Adams, New York, one early March day, cold even by northern New York standards. I had come up Interstate 81 to lecture at a community college in Watertown, the last city a driver sees before crossing the bridge over the Saint Lawrence River into Canada.
To orient me, my hosta newspaper editor deeply invested in his communityshared a handful of names of local, historic figures he admired. Whipple was near the top of his list. The name did not register with me, so he helpfully supplied an epitaph: He was the Episcopal bishop who went to see Lincoln to try to stop a mass hanging of the Sioux Indians. That sentence landed with an impact that made me want more information, and I sought it as soon as I got back to Syracuse University, where I teach. I pursued the bishop from there. I found that, yes, Whipple did go to see Lincoln about the Sioux (henceforth to be called by their own name, the Dakotas), but the visit took place in a much larger, more impressive context: years of Whipples advocacy, including several trips and letters to Washington in which the bishop demanded a sweeping reform of how the U.S. government treated Native Americans. Whipple acted as a one-man movement, seeking respect and protection for American Indians to replace the monstrous fraud and injustice to which he saw them subjected.
It took me little time to find in the story a contemporary resonance. I had recently had occasion to reread one of the most powerful Christian documents of my lifetime, Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.s Letter from a Birmingham Jail. It seemed to speak to Whipples best work, as a dedicated social reformer laboring on behalf of abused people amidst a time of great violence.
Kings essay, written principally to white moderates during the Civil Rights campaign in 1963, focuses on the paradox of religious figures and institutions that claim moral authority yet do little with it, despite being figuratively sunk to their breastbones in the poisonous waters of injustice. Kings prose bore heartbreaking witness. On sweltering summer days and crisp autumn mornings I have looked at the Souths beautiful churches with their lofty spires pointing heavenward. I have beheld the impressive outlines of her massive religious-education buildings. Over and over I have found myself asking: What kind of people worship here? Who is their God?
Early Christians, he recalled, confronted head-on the Roman Empires social abuses. Their acts of dangerous defiance contrasted with the largely silent Southern church of his own time, one he said had a
Whipple does not bear comparison with King. Who does? But he possessed a motivation similar to the vision King commanded. He placed Christianity above race and ethnicityspecifically focusing on Native Americansat a time when few whites, clergy or otherwise, did likewise.
That an individual Christian might act as if the requirements of the faith trump racial and cultural divisions is a difficult task, but not an impossible one. Perhaps because something similar had happened within my own extended family, I felt all the more drawn to Whipple. In 1952, my uncle Lansing Hicks, a young Episcopal priest from North Carolina who had married my mothers middle sister, resigned in protest from his position as a professor of theology at a divinity school in Tennessee. It was the job he had always wanted. He had a toddler son, and his wife, my aunt Helen, was pregnant with their second child. But the schools trustees raised a serious moral obstacle when they declined to desegregate the school, which would have allowed African Americans to study there. Lansing, along with seven of his colleagues, rebuked the board, declaring its decision untenable in the light of Christian ethics. The trustees remained unmoved. My uncle gave up his dream job, resigning along with his seven colleagues.
In the mid-nineteenth century, journalist John OSullivan coined the phrase manifest destiny, shorthand for white Americans territorial ambitions and the related belief the Indians would vanish before them. As a newly consecrated bishop, Whipple moved to Minnesota in 1859, a year after its political leaders had adopted the idea of manifest destiny on an official state seal, showing a white farmer at his plow watching an Indian ride into the setting sun. Whipple arrived a missionary, eager to preach to Indians and whites alike, but he did not subscribe to a vision of Native American dispossession. That made him a countercultural figure.
A month after Whipple took up residence in the state, he began lobbying on the Indians behalf, and when he finally reached President Lincoln, he did so at what a less determined individual would have recognized was the worst time possible. In September 1862 the Dakota War spread death and terror across Minnesota, its principle victims white civilians; the states leaders demanded Native Americans be exterminated. That did not stop Whipple. He recognized that moral authority, when kept sheathed like a sword in its scabbard, eventually loses its purpose.
WHEN HE STEPPED ACROSS THE THRESHOLD INTO Abraham Lincolns White House in September 1862, Henry Whipple had come directly from the war that had thrown his state into upheaval. Minnesotas first Protestant Episcopal Church bishop, Whipple estimated that eight hundred civilians had lost their lives, and many bodies still lay unburied on the prairies and creek banks where they had fallen. He had come to tell Lincoln how this catastrophe had occurredand, more important, how a future such disaster could be avoided.
By coincidence (or, as some might have it, the hand of providence), the bishop chose an extraordinary moment to approach Lincoln. The very week he went to see the president, more than seventy-five thousand Union troops marched west through Maryland to confront General Robert E. Lees Army of Northern Virginia, which had crossed the Potomac River in a daring invasion of the North. That Wednesday, the Army of the Potomac, commanded by General George McClellan (whom Whipple counted as a friend), fought Lee outside the village of Sharpsburg, at Antietam Creek. By sunset, more than twenty-two thousand men were dead, wounded, or missing, making that September 17 the bloodiest single day in American history. Neither side emerged clearly victorious, but McClellan had possession of the battlefield, a tactical win that would stifle talk in Europe about its governments recognizing the South as an independent nation. In the office in which he would meet Whipple, Lincoln had quietly drafted an executive order to free nearly four million men, women, and children held as slaves. He kept the document in a desk drawer, awaiting a sign from God that the moment had come to make it public. He would recognize Antietam as providing that sign.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Lincolns Bishop: A President, a Priest, and the Fate of 300 Dakota Sioux Warriors»

Look at similar books to Lincolns Bishop: A President, a Priest, and the Fate of 300 Dakota Sioux Warriors. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Lincolns Bishop: A President, a Priest, and the Fate of 300 Dakota Sioux Warriors»

Discussion, reviews of the book Lincolns Bishop: A President, a Priest, and the Fate of 300 Dakota Sioux Warriors and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.