All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher, except brief passages for review purposes.
Printed by BookMobile in the US and CPI Books Ltd in the UK.
The US printed edition of this book comes on Forest Stewardship Council-certifi ed, 30% recycled paper. The printer, BookMobile, is 100% wind-powered.
1
A MEDAL FOR BRADLEY MANNING
(02:05:12 AM ) bradass87: its almost bookworthy in itself, how this played
Bradley Manning deserves the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
If the 24-year-old Army private from Crescent, Oklahoma, did supply WikiLeaks with its choicest materialthe Iraq War logs, the Afghan War logs, and the State Department cablesthen he surely deserves some important national honor instead of the military prison cell where he presently awaits court martial.
Charged under the Espionage Act of 1917 and with aiding the enemy, Bradley Manning faces life in prison. He has put his sanity and his freedom on the line so that Americans might know what their government has doneand is doingall over the world. Knowing what our government is doing abroad is not a special privilege for statesmen, spies and insider journalists, it is the right and responsibility of all citizens. Manning has blown the whistle on criminal violations of American military and international law. He has exposed our governments pathological overclassification of important public documents.
There are at least five reasons why Manning, if he did what the government accuses him of doing, deserves that medal.
1. For Giving Our Foreign Policy Elite the Public Supervision It So Badly Needs
In the past ten years, American statecraft has moved from one catastrophe to another, laying waste to other nations while never failing to damage its own national interests. A Brown University study finds the past decades wars have resulted in at least 140,000 civilians, 6,000 American soldiers and 2,300 civilian contractors killed in Iraq and Afghanistan, with 4,000 young US veterans dying after returning home; this has cost the US treasury $3.7 trillion, and done untold damage to the infrastructure of Iraq. Few outside Washington would argue that any of this has made America safer, much less brought human rights to Iraq.
Although downsizing our entire foreign policy establishment is not an option, the website WikiLeaks has at least brought public scrutiny to bear on our self-destructive statesmen and -women. No one should be more grateful for these revelations than Americans, whose government has deceived us with such horrible consequences.
Consider our invasion of Iraq, a war based on willful distortions, government secrecy, and the complaisant failure of our major media to ask the important questions. But what if someone like Bradley Manning had provided the press with the necessary government documents, which would have made so much self-evident in the months before the war began?
Thanks to Mannings alleged disclosures, we have a sense of what transpired in Iraq and Afghanistan. We have an image of how Washington operates in the world. Thanks to those revelations we now know just how our government leaned on the Vatican to quell opposition to the Iraq War. We now know how Washington pressured the German government to block the prosecution of CIA agents who kidnapped an innocent man, Khaled El-Masri, while he was on vacation. We know how our State Department lobbied hard to prevent a minimum wage increase in Haiti, the hemispheres poorest nation.
It is all to our benefit that more whistleblowers make themselves heard. A foreign policy based on secrets and spin has manifestly failed us. In a democracy, statecraft cannot function if it is shrouded in secrecy. For bringing us the truth, for breaking the seal on that self-protective policy of secrecy, Bradley Manning deserves the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
2. For Exposing the Pathological Overclassification of Americas Public Documents
Secrecy is for losers, as the late Senator and United Nations Ambassador Daniel Patrick Moynihan used to say. If this is indeed the case, it would be hard to find a bigger loser than the US government. When Moynihan, a conservative Democrat who served as Nixons UN envoy, wrote those words in 1991, the US was classifying upwards of six million documents a year. Today that figure has risen by an order of magnitude, with Washington classifying some seventy-seven million documents in 2010.
Government secrecy, especially in the domain of foreign affairs, has become pathological. In June 2011, the National Security Agency declassified documents from 1809, while the Department of Defense only last month declassified the Pentagon Papers, publicly available in book form these last four decades. Our government is only now finishing its declassification of documents relating to World War I.
This would be ridiculous if it werent tragic. Ask the historians. Barton J. Bernstein, professor emeritus of history at Stanford University and a founder of its international relations program, describes the governments classification of foreign-policy documents as bizarre, arbitrary, and nonsensical. George Herring, professor emeritus at the University of Kentucky and author of the encyclopedic From Colony to Superpower: A History of US Foreign Policy , has chronicled how his delight at being appointed to a CIA advisory panel on declassification turned to disgust once he realized that he was being used as window dressing by an agency with no intention of opening its records, no matter how important or how old, to public scrutiny.
The people of a democratic state ignore such signs at their risk. If a society like ours doesnt know its own history, it becomes the great power equivalent of a wandering amnesiac, not knowing what it did yesterday or where it will end up tomorrow. Right now, classification is the disease of Washington, secrecy its mania, and dementia its end point. This is not just the diagnosis made by groups like the ACLU and WikiLeaks; J. Williams Leonard, career federal civil servant and director of the Information Security Oversight Office from 2002 to 2007, has recently called for sanctions against officials who gratuitously classify government documents.
President Obama came into office promising a sunshine policy for his administration while singing the praises of whistleblowers. Instead, he has launched the fiercest campaign against whistleblowers the republic has ever seen, and dragged our foreign policy deeper into the shadows. Challenging the classification of each tightly guarded document is impossible. No organization has the resources to fight this fight, nor would they be likely to win right now. Absent a radical change in our governments diplomatic and military bureaucracies, massive overclassification will only continue.
If we hope to know what our government is so busily doing all over the world, massive leaks from insider whistleblowers are, like it or not, the only recourse. Our whistleblower protection laws urgently need to catch up to this state of affairs, and though we are hardly there yet, Bradley Manning helped take us part of the way. He did what Barack Obama swore he would do on coming into office. For striking a blow against our governments fanatical and counterproductive habit of secrecy, Bradley Manning deserves not punishment but the Presidential Medal of Freedom.