• Complain

Gary Lachman - The Caretakers of the Cosmos: Living Responsibly in an Unfinished World

Here you can read online Gary Lachman - The Caretakers of the Cosmos: Living Responsibly in an Unfinished World full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2013, publisher: Floris Books, genre: Science fiction / Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Gary Lachman The Caretakers of the Cosmos: Living Responsibly in an Unfinished World
  • Book:
    The Caretakers of the Cosmos: Living Responsibly in an Unfinished World
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Floris Books
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2013
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Caretakers of the Cosmos: Living Responsibly in an Unfinished World: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Caretakers of the Cosmos: Living Responsibly in an Unfinished World" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Why are we here? Human beings have asked themselves this question for centuries. Modern science largely argues that human beings are chance products of a purposeless universe, but other traditions believe humanity has an essential role and responsibility in creation.
Lachman brings together many strands of esoteric, spiritual, and philosophical thought to form a counter-argument to the nihilism that permeates the twenty-first century. Offering a radical alternative to postmodern apathy, he argues that we humans are indeed the caretakers of the universe, entrusted with a daunting task healing and repairing creation itself.
This is an important book from a key thinker of our time, addressing some of the most urgent questions facing humanity.

Gary Lachman: author's other books


Who wrote The Caretakers of the Cosmos: Living Responsibly in an Unfinished World? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Caretakers of the Cosmos: Living Responsibly in an Unfinished World — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Caretakers of the Cosmos: Living Responsibly in an Unfinished World" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Contents For Colin Wilson who has certainly repaired quite a bit of the - photo 1
Contents

For Colin Wilson, who has certainly repaired
quite a bit of the universe.

If we all desire it intensely, if we organise all the visible and invisible powers of earth and fling them upward, if we all battle together like fellow combatants eternally vigilant then the Universe might possibly be saved.

Nikos Kazantzakis

Many people have helped make this book possible. Id like to thank my editor Christopher Moore for suggesting it and Floris Books for being supportive. Thanks too go to the staff of the British Library for their ever reliable help. My friend James Hamilton endured many conversations and made many suggestions. Special thanks goes to Iain McGilchrist for reading some of the work while in progress and for his helpful comments, and Anja Flode Bjorlo for crucial help with the index and research. My friends John Browner, Lisa Yarger, and their daughter Greta were once again extremely generous in their hospitality in Munich, where some of this book was written; aptly, a chapter having much to do with Max Scheler, who was born there. As always my sons Maximilian and Joshua and their mother Ruth Jones were of inestimable assistance in providing me with some very special reasons for taking care of the cosmos.

This book has a bold title, and it may be a good idea to begin by trying to explain it. While working on an earlier book, The Quest for Hermes Trismegistus (2011), about the influence of Hermeticism and its mythical founder, the thrice greatest Hermes, on western consciousness, I touched on the idea of human beings as cosmic caretakers, as individuals given the responsibility of taking care of the cosmos no mean task, as Im sure readers will agree. Although for centuries Hermes Trismegistus was believed to have been a real person who lived at the dawn of time, and who received a primordial divine revelation the perennial philosophy that is at the heart of much of western spiritual thought he is now thought to have been a fictional figure, devised by the authors of the Hermetic writings, who lived in Alexandria in Egypt in the first few centuries after Christ. In the Asclepius, one of the books making up what is known as the Corpus Hermeticum, the body of mystical writings on which Hermeticism is based, Hermes Trismegistus tells his student Asclepius that man is a creature of two natures, of, indeed, two worlds. Man is, according to Hermes, a creature of the natural world, of the body and the senses, and as such is subject to all the laws and limitations that come with living in the material world. But he is also an inhabitant of another world, that of mind, spirit, the soul, consciousness, which, in essence, is free from the limitations of his other nature.

How this came about is told in the Hermetic creation myth. created in the image of God. Recent scholarship, however, argues that the author of the Poimandres, who remains unknown, came to the idea independently. Whatever the case, in two powerful spiritual traditions that have had an enormous influence on western consciousness, the same idea, that man is made in the image of the divine plays a central role.

Unlike in the Judeo-Christian tradition, but similar to the Platonic and Gnostic creation accounts, in the Hermetic account the actual work of making the cosmos was undertaken by a second Nous, a demiurge or craftsman, created by the first Nous to carry out the job. When man saw what the craftsman had forged, he marvelled at its beauty, and quite understandably, wanted to be a creator himself. Nous, his Father, loving man, agreed. The craftsman did as well, and happy to share in his work, he gave man some of his power. He gave him a share of the seven spheres which encircle the earth, the seven spheres being the orbits of the seven ancient planets, Moon, Sun, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. These seven spheres govern what takes place on earth; in Hermeticism, as in astrology, they are the source of our destiny and fate. Readers familiar with the history of astronomy will know that they are the seven planetary spheres that pre-Copernican astronomers believed encircled our earth, and they will also know that the ancient astronomers believed that the earth itself was at the centre of the cosmos.

Now, in the Hermetic creation myth, the cosmos and the earth were originally formed through the action of the creative Word, the logos or Mind. But by the time that man is created, the Word has left the earth and returned to its source in Nous, leaving behind a world of mere matter. It is explained in the creation account that the material which the craftsman uses to create the cosmos is a kind of grim darkness that originates in the chaos which precedes creation. When the logos leaves it, it returns to its original state. To readers of contemporary cosmology, grim darkness sounds rather like the dark matter of which we are told most of the universe is made. It is still a beautiful world, and through the turning of the seven spheres, living things have emerged from the earths waters. Man, curious about what the creator has been up to, desires to see the earth. He pierces the seven spheres and looks down upon the beautiful world, marvelling at the craftsmans handiwork. The earth, however we can also say Nature sees man too, and recognising the Nous within him, desires him apparently the earth is a woman wanting to partake again of the divine Word. Man, too, sees his reflection and hence that of Nous on earths waters, and becomes enchanted with it, much as the youth Narcissus does in the Greek myth. No sooner does man wish to be with the earth then he drops from his heavenly perch through the seven spheres and enters into a form without the Word, that is, a body; in other words, matter. (Up until then he has been in a solely spiritual immaterial form.) It is through this descent from beyond the seven spheres to the earth that man becomes a creature of two worlds. Passing through the seven spheres, he absorbs their character and becomes subject to their laws. Wrapped in the arms of the earth, he is subject to all its limitations, to the constraints of mindless, spiritless matter, and the necessities inflicted on him by the dictates of destiny and fate. But within him still glows a spark of his origin, his birthright from the world beyond, and it is this connection with his source, with its freedom and power that will save him.

The Gnostics

In many ways this myth is very similar to the account of mans place in the cosmos given by the Gnostics, who were contemporaries of the ancient Hermeticists. The Gnostics were early Christians who embraced an interpretation of Christs teaching very different from what became the official church. As in the Hermetic myth, for the Gnostics, creation is the work of a second Nous or God, but in their case it is an entirely disastrous affair. This second God, whom they call the demiurge, or half god, is something of an idiot; at least he is so inflated with his sense of power and importance that he comes to consider himself the true God. For the Gnostics, this demiurge is Jehovah, the God of the Bible William Blake called him Old Nobodaddy and the world he has created is a kind of trap, an evil realm of falsity and oppression. Yet like the Hermeticists, the Gnostics, too, believed that a spark of the true God the God beyond the world was hidden within them. The aim of their spiritual practices and beliefs was to awaken this spark and release it, so that they could return to their source, beyond creation.

This notion of the world being a trap, and its creator a kind of demon, has had a powerful influence on western consciousness. Although for many centuries, the only source of information about the Gnostics were hostile accounts written about them by church fathers, who saw them as heretics indeed the church was particularly successful in wiping them out in the last century or so, the work of many different scholars has provided a different, broader view of these early Christians and their ideas. Gnostic ideas can be found in the work of novelists like Hermann Hesse and Thomas Pynchon, in the philosopher Martin Heidegger, for whom man is thrown into the world, and in less high-brow sources, such as the science fiction of Philip K. Dick and the films in

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Caretakers of the Cosmos: Living Responsibly in an Unfinished World»

Look at similar books to The Caretakers of the Cosmos: Living Responsibly in an Unfinished World. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Caretakers of the Cosmos: Living Responsibly in an Unfinished World»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Caretakers of the Cosmos: Living Responsibly in an Unfinished World and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.