Benjamin Garland - White Racialism and American Nationalism

Copyright 2019 Benjamin Garland All rights reserved Cover by Lucullus Dedicated to all of the right wing political prisoners and dissidents who are sitting in jail or awaiting trial right now for daring to stand against the destruction of America and its history. Author's NoteThe following consists of four articles I wrote for Daily Stormer during 2017 and 2018, wherein I make the case for the legitimacy of racially based nationalism among white American patriots. They were written in the context of an ongoing debate about which direction the pro-white struggle in America should take. As a result, I almost immediately regretted mixing in the movement drama, fearing that this would cause the articles to become dated very quickly. Because of this, I considered rewriting them. However, upon re-reading the articles, I decided that they actually stand on their own pretty well.

Even if you, the reader, are far removed from the environment that initially spawned them, I believe the articles will still be coherent, therefore I have decided to leave them as is, as they were originally written. I hope that you don't find any of it confusing and if you do, I apologize. What is contained in this book may also shock and enrage you, or it may not. That all depends on your political views, preconceived ideas and personal sensibilities. What I hope is that it will at least intrigue and entertain you. It is one part polemic, one part intellectual argument and one part history lesson, written in the spirit of maximum political incorrectness, with the goal of packing a punch.

I received much positive feedback from the articles when they were originally published (and some negative) and they sparked quite a bit of interesting and heated debate, which tells me I did my job correctly. Even the anti-American, anti-free speech Jewish Anti Defamation League did a write-up on them, which was quite the honor The reader is invited to send any questions, comments, love letters, insults or hate mail to the author at theendofzion02@gmail.com Enjoy! Ben Garland, January 12, 2019 * https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounders/daily-stormer-book clubs-sbc Contents The Alt-Right Represents True American Nationalism ~ 7 ~ White Racialism and American Nationalism Pt. 1 ~ 25 ~ White Racialism and American Nationalism Pt. 2 ~ 46 ~ White Racialism and American Nationalism Pt. 3 ~ 63 ~ The Alt-Right Represents TrueAmerican Nationalism I can almost hear the snickers and jeers over the title of this article, from left and right alike. For those who think the idea that the Alt-Right is the only true representative of American Nationalism is far-fetched, here is my challenge to you: Show me where I am wrong.

Show me how the Founding Fathers werent race realists. Show me how America wasnt a White Patriarchy prior to 1920. Show me where the Founding Fathers said women should have the right to vote. Show me where the Founding Fathers said blacks should have full citizenship. Its really rather simple: We, the Alt-Right, are White Nationalists, and we want to reinstate the Patriarchy. America was founded in the words of the ever insightful Fash McQueen as a moral, patriarchal, limited-franchise Republic A White Ethno-State.

The traditional family was seen as the backbone of the nation and was revered above all else. Women were considered property. They were taught to obey their husbands and that their world was exclusively home, hearth, and family. They were not to hold office, vote or mix in the meetings of men or public affairs in any capacity. Sluttery was seen as an unforgivable sin. Women were cherished for this; they were not oppressed.

In fact without any room for debate they were much happier back then when they were fulfilling this sacred and natural role than they are now after having allegedly been liberated. Here are a few quotes from the most important and celebrated Founding Father of all, Thomas Jefferson: Women, who to prevent depravation of morals andambiguity of issue, could not mix promiscuously in thepublic meetings of men.A lady who has been seen as a sloven or slut in themorning will never efface the impression she has made. (To his daughter on her wedding day): Thehappiness of your life now depends on the continuing toplease a single person. To this all other objects must besecondary, even your love for me. Jefferson was horrified by seeing women in public roles while visiting France, where liberalism had been birthed and then unleashed in a fury after the Revolution of 1789. He wrote to Washington that this meant that France was in a desperate state and that fortunately, for the happiness of men and women alike, this phenomenon did not extend itself to America as well. Unfortunately, the words he wrote in the Declaration of Independence would later be twisted from their original meaning and used to justify that which he was staunchly against: All men are created equal. Those five words, without a doubt, have been the most devastatingly consequential words in our entire history.

Both the suffragettes movement, which began in earnest in 1848 at the infamous Seneca Falls Convention and ended after winning women the right to vote in 1920, and the Negro civil rights movements borrowed heavily from Jeffersons Declaration but the historical record speaks loud and clear on what his views on these matters actually were. Idealistic liberals and outright enemies of America have blatantly twisted Jeffersons seemingly abstract words as well as the words of other Founding Fathers to push their own agendas. This is not the Founders fault, and given that these agendas run counter to American history and American interests, they are on their face an insult to these very men who are cited as their justification. The 1848 Seneca Falls Declaration of Sentiments quotes Jefferson virtually word for word, and then dishonestly applies it to women: We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights governments are instituted, deriving their powers from the consent of the governed. The above-stated views on women have only been overturned recently, really only since the second wave of feminism took off in the 60s. For a while, those who still held these views were ridiculed for being old-fashioned.

Now that liberalism has so thoroughly taken hold, those of us who still hold these views which, again, are the same as the Founding Fathers are called radicals. Extremists, even. What these views really are are normal. They are American. They are