• Complain

Michael W. Hankins - Flying Camelot: The F-15, the F-16, and the Weaponization of Fighter Pilot Nostalgia

Here you can read online Michael W. Hankins - Flying Camelot: The F-15, the F-16, and the Weaponization of Fighter Pilot Nostalgia full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Ithaca, year: 2021, publisher: Cornell University Press, genre: History. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Michael W. Hankins Flying Camelot: The F-15, the F-16, and the Weaponization of Fighter Pilot Nostalgia
  • Book:
    Flying Camelot: The F-15, the F-16, and the Weaponization of Fighter Pilot Nostalgia
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Cornell University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2021
  • City:
    Ithaca
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Flying Camelot: The F-15, the F-16, and the Weaponization of Fighter Pilot Nostalgia: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Flying Camelot: The F-15, the F-16, and the Weaponization of Fighter Pilot Nostalgia" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Flying Camelotbrings us back to the post-Vietnam era, when the US Air Force launched two new, state-of-the art fighter aircraft: the F-15 Eagle and the F-16 Fighting Falcon. It was an era when debates about aircraft superiority went publicand these were not uncontested discussions. Michael W. Hankins delves deep into the fighter pilot culture that gave rise to both designs, showing how a small but vocal group of pilots, engineers, and analysts in the Department of Defense weaponized their own culture to affect technological development and larger political change.

The design and advancement of the F-15 and F-16 reflected this groups nostalgic desire to recapture the best of World War I air combat. Known as the Fighter Mafia, and later growing into the media savvy political powerhouse Reform Movement, it believed that American weapons systems were too complicated and expensive, and thus vulnerable. The groups leader was Colonel John Boyd, a contentious former fighter pilot heralded as a messianic figure by many in its ranks. He and his group advocated for a shift in focus from the multi-role interceptors the Air Force had designed in the early Cold War towards specialized air-to-air combat dogfighters. Their influence stretched beyond design and into larger politicized debates about US national security, debates that still resonate today.

A biography of fighter pilot culture and the nostalgia that drove decision-making, Flying Camelot deftly engages both popular culture and archives to animate the movement that shook the foundations of the Pentagon and Congress.

Michael W. Hankins: author's other books


Who wrote Flying Camelot: The F-15, the F-16, and the Weaponization of Fighter Pilot Nostalgia? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Flying Camelot: The F-15, the F-16, and the Weaponization of Fighter Pilot Nostalgia — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Flying Camelot: The F-15, the F-16, and the Weaponization of Fighter Pilot Nostalgia" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
A CKNOWLEDGMENTS

When I was working at the Air Force Academy, Brian McAllister Linn visited for a guest lecture. Before the event, he took time to meet with the history faculty. Instead of presenting his own research, he wanted to hear about ours. When I explained my project, he told me it might be a good fit for a series on which he was working at Cornell University Press. That is how I luckily happened upon an amazing, fruitful professional relationship. Emily Andrew has been kind, gracious, encouraging, and patient, guiding me through the process, and so has Allegra Martschenko. Brian Linn and David J. Silbey, general editor of the Battlegrounds series, provided wonderful support and encouragement, as well.

In terms of the research on which this manuscript was based, I need to thank Don Mrozek, an inspiring mentor, who continues to provide insight. I have also benefited from the feedback of Michael Krysko, Albert Hamscher, Andrew Orr, and Joseph Unekis. I was fortunate to have worked closely with aviation historian Robin Higham, only a few months before he passed away. Many others helped with the writing process, including General Richard Myers, David Vail, Ted Nagurny, Jennifer Zoebelein, and Kate Tietzen. I am grateful to Kansas State Universitys history department, which supported me emotionally and financially.

No historians work would be possible without the archivists who make primary source documents accessible to us. I had help from many, but Mary Elizabeth Ruwell at the Air Force Academys Special Collections went above and beyondwhen I found myself stuck in Colorado Springs without a car, she not only helped me find research material for the project, but personally drove me to and from the archives. I also had great help from the Air Force Historical Research Agency (especially Dan Haulman and Mary Dysart), the University of Texas at Dallas Special Collections, John OConnell at the President Gerald Ford Library, Mark Nankivil at the Greater St. Louis Air and Space Museum, Heather Anderson and Sarah Musi at Boeing, Carla Krivanek at Lockheed, and the wonderful staff of the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum Archives, especially Elizabeth Borja, Melissa Keiser, and Kate Igoe. I am particularly indebted to novelist Robert Coram, author of Boyd: The Fighter Pilot Who Changed the Art of War. Coram graciously made his research material for that work available at the Marines Corps History Division Archives Branch at Quantico, Virginia. The thousands of pages of correspondence, interview notes, and official documents in that collection were invaluable. Although our interpretations of John Boyd and the surrounding subject matter may diverge, Coram assembled an amazing body of work, and I am very grateful for it and for his generosity.

A number of years ago, I told Don Mrozek that I wanted to study the post-Vietnam Air Force, specifically its changes in training and technology. He said it was a good idea, but one on which someone else at Kansas State had already been working. That person turned out to be Brian Laslie, who I am lucky to say is now a good friend. Not only has he given incisive feedback on numerous versions of this text, but he has walked me through many questions and worries. Many others have provided useful feedback on this text or its supporting materials. I am deeply grateful to Angelica Aboulhosn, James and Emilie Tindle, Mary Elizabeth Walters, Roger Launius, John Terino, Steve Fino, Roger Connor, Jeremy Kinney, Margaret Weitekamp, Angela Riotto, Doug Kennedy, Bob Wettemann, Jennifer Weber, Craig Morris, David Stone, Larry Burke, Sean Seyer, John Krige, and Paul Martell-Mead.

Finally, I would like to thank my friends and family, who have been through a lot with me, and been supportive of me as I worked on this project. I dont know if I got into this more because of all those times my father brought home test footage of Paveway bombs being dropped from F-4 Phantoms, or because of the time Ryan English casually suggested, You can pursue research in military history focusing on air power, right? Either way, this whole thing is probably their fault.

While I have tried my best to ensure the text is free of errors, if any remain, they are mine alone and have nothing to do with any of the wonderful people listed above.

B IBLIOGRAPHY
Archival Sources

Air Force Historical Research Agency: Maxwell Air Force Base, AL

Greater St. Louis Air and Space Museum Archives

Marine Corps Archives and Records Division, Quantico, VA: John Boyd Personal Papers, Robert Coram Personal Papers

National Archives and Records Administration, College Park, MD

President Gerald Ford Presidential Library: White House Central Files Subject FilesND 1 Aircraft 3/1/756/30/75, Martin R. Hoffmann Papers

Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum Archives

United States Air Force Academy, McDermott Library: Clark Special Collections Branch

University of Texas at Dallas, George H. Williams Jr. World War I Aviation Library: Ola Slater Collection, George H. Williams Collection, Henry Clay Papers, James Kerr Papers

Other Sources

Aboulafia, Richard.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Flying Camelot: The F-15, the F-16, and the Weaponization of Fighter Pilot Nostalgia»

Look at similar books to Flying Camelot: The F-15, the F-16, and the Weaponization of Fighter Pilot Nostalgia. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Flying Camelot: The F-15, the F-16, and the Weaponization of Fighter Pilot Nostalgia»

Discussion, reviews of the book Flying Camelot: The F-15, the F-16, and the Weaponization of Fighter Pilot Nostalgia and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.