• Complain

Robert Justin Goldstein - Flag Burning and Free Speech: The Case of Texas v. Johnson

Here you can read online Robert Justin Goldstein - Flag Burning and Free Speech: The Case of Texas v. Johnson full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Lawrence, year: 2000, publisher: University Press of Kansas, genre: History. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Robert Justin Goldstein Flag Burning and Free Speech: The Case of Texas v. Johnson
  • Book:
    Flag Burning and Free Speech: The Case of Texas v. Johnson
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    University Press of Kansas
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2000
  • City:
    Lawrence
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Flag Burning and Free Speech: The Case of Texas v. Johnson: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Flag Burning and Free Speech: The Case of Texas v. Johnson" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

In a free society where it often seems nothing is sacred, many feel that one thing at least should be: that despite constitutional guarantees of free speech, it should be illegal to desecrate the American flag. For most Americans, no symbol is more charged with emotion, and incidents of its abuse have led many to declare that freedom of expression has its limits.When Gregory Lee Johnson burned a flag as part of a political protest, he was convicted for flag desecration under Texas law, but the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the conviction on First Amendment grounds and the Supreme Court confirmed that physically damaging the flag constituted symbolicand protectedspeech. Robert Justin Goldstein now examines this landmark case and the attendant controversy over whether protection of the flag conflicts with constitutional guarantees of free speech. He also explores the cases ramifications for future legal battles.Goldstein, who has published widely on the flag desecration debate, offers a concise and updated account of the controversy for students and general readers. He traces the history of the flag protection movement from its nineteenth-century origins through the enactment of early state laws, and he examines modern incidents of flag desecration from the Vietnam era to the present.At the heart of the book is the Johnson case and the political firestorm that it ignited. Goldstein examines the legal and philosophical issues surrounding the case through courtroom testimony, oral arguments, and interviews with Johnson, the lawyers (including former Whitewater prosecutor Kenneth Starr and the late famed radical attorney William Kunstler), and the judges who heard the many rounds of appeals. He then takes us inside the Supreme Court to analyze the justices reasoning that government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds it offensive. Finally, he looks at reactions to the decisionincluding recent heated attempts to protect the flag through legislation or constitutional amendment.Goldstein helps us better understand the human emotion and psychological drama that underlie abstract legal and constitutional issues and that fundamental rights sometimes are held by the courts to be superior to majority rule or popular emotion. By demonstrating how competing and often contradictory concepts can be embodied in the very same symbol, he helps us understand the fundamental meanings of democracy and patriotism.

Robert Justin Goldstein: author's other books


Who wrote Flag Burning and Free Speech: The Case of Texas v. Johnson? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Flag Burning and Free Speech: The Case of Texas v. Johnson — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Flag Burning and Free Speech: The Case of Texas v. Johnson" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
BURNING
THE
FLAG
Flag Burning and Free Speech The Case of Texas v Johnson - image 1
BURNING
THE
FLAG
The Great 19891990
American Flag
Desecration Controversy
Flag Burning and Free Speech The Case of Texas v Johnson - image 2
Robert Justin Goldstein
THE KENT STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Kent, Ohio, and London, England
1996 by The Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio 44242
All rights reserved
Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 95-5541
ISBN 0-87338-526-8
ISBN 0-87338-598-5 (pbk.)
Manufactured in the United States of America
02 01 00 99 98 97 5 4 3 2
First paperback printing
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Goldstein, Robert Justin.
Burning the flag : the great 19891990 American flag desecration controversy / Robert Justin Goldstein.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographic references and index.
ISBN 0-87338-526-8 (cloth)
ISBN O-87338-598-5 (pbk.)
1. FlagsDesecrationUnited States. I. Title.
CR113.G568 199695-5541
929.920973DC20CIP
British Library Cataloging-in-Publication data are available.
Picture 3
CONTENTS
Picture 4
Preface
Picture 5
Picture 6
Petris account summed up the depths and ultimate uncompromisability of the dispute that raged in American society and politics in 1989 and 1990 in the aftermath of the Johnson decision. Like a small minority of his fellow Republican congressmen and a clear majority of Democratic congressmen, Petri attempted to satisfy both sides of the dispute: in 1989 he voted in favor of the Flag Protection Act (FPA) of 1989, which Congress passed in an attempt to override the Johnson ruling, while in 1990, he voted against a Bush administration-backed constitutional amendment designed to accomplish the same ends after the Supreme Court struck down the FPA in its June 11, 1990, U.S. v. Eichman decision.
In the end, the right to desecrate the flag for purposes of political protest was theoretically legally established (although, as will be pointed out in this books epilogue, anyone attempting to exercise this right in practice still faced a high chance of being prosecuted for something), and the flag and the country continued to exist more or less as before. But the year-long political focus on this purely symbolic issue unquestionably contributed to the same failure of the nations leaders to address the countrys real problems which had fostered the very climate of general national uncertainty and insecurity that had originally fueled the massive negative reaction to the Johnson ruling (a subject that is discussed at some length at the end of this book).
As many readers will already have detected, I believe that the Supreme Court decided the flag desecration issue correctly in 198990. So that all readers can be fully alerted to detect and discount my biases, I believe that it is important to set out my own views on this contentious subject. From one perspective, the 198990 flag desecration controversy was surely one of the greatest examples of much ado about nothing in American, if not world, history. The United States was not over-run with mobs of flag burners in the 1980s; as the Tampa Tribune pointed out on June 28, 1989, You are likely to live a lifetime, and never see a dissident burn a flag, except on television where such events are greatly welcomed. All we know about flag-burners is that they are microscopically few and seriously deficient in public-relations skills. Furthermore, there is no evidence that flag desecration threatens the flags symbolic value. Indeed, the reaction to the Supreme Courts Johnson ruling suggests that from the standpoint of promoting patriotism and mass flag waving, both verbal and actual, Johnsons contribution was virtually unprecedented (and certainly unheralded).
Although tolerating flag desecration is hardly likely to threaten the flags symbolic value (or anything else), forbidding flag burning as a means of peaceful political protest will surely diminish the flags symbolic ability to represent political freedom. As Professor Arnold Loewy has written, Perhaps the ultimate irony is that Johnson has done more to preserve the flag as a symbol of liberty than any prior decision, while the decisions detractors would allow real desecration of the flag by making it a symbol of poltical oppression. Although the particular incident involving Johnson was isolated and ultimately insignificant, the principle represented by the Supreme Courts decision was absolutely fundamental to the core values of a political democracy: the right to vigorous, vehement, and even highly offensive and upsetting peaceful dissent from government policy. As Justice William Brennan summed up this key point in his Johnson opinion, If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the Government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable. Or as the late Supreme Court justice Robert Jackson declared in a 1942 case (in which the Court outlawed compulsory flag salutes and recitals of the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools), in what remains probably the most eloquent and apposite paean to democratic principles ever penned by the Court:
Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard. The case is made difficult not because the principles of its decisions are obscure but because the flag involved is our own. Freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order. If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion or other matters of opinion.
As Justice Jackson suggests, much of the controversy over the Johnson ruling came not from the principles at issue but because it involved the flag, and the flag involved is our own. No serious claim would likely be made that it should be unlawful for an opponent of the 1991 American war with Iraq to burn a newspaper copy of President George Bushs explanation for this policy. Although ultimately any flag is simply a piece of cloth or other substance with colors or designs imprinted on it, many Americans have clearly invested this fabric with highly emotionally charged values. But, again to quote Justice Jackson, A person gets from a symbol the meaning he puts into it, and what is one mans comfort and inspiration is anothers jest and scorn. If there is to be any meaning to freedom of expression in the United States, it can only be that if President Bush can wave the flag as he sends troops to Panama or Iraq, then dissenters can protest that action by burning the flag. As the great civil libertarian scholar Alexander Meiklejohn has written, the true meaning of freedom of expression is that if
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Flag Burning and Free Speech: The Case of Texas v. Johnson»

Look at similar books to Flag Burning and Free Speech: The Case of Texas v. Johnson. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Flag Burning and Free Speech: The Case of Texas v. Johnson»

Discussion, reviews of the book Flag Burning and Free Speech: The Case of Texas v. Johnson and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.