• Complain

Kathryn Shively - Natures Civil War: Common Soldiers and the Environment in 1862 Virginia

Here you can read online Kathryn Shively - Natures Civil War: Common Soldiers and the Environment in 1862 Virginia full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Chapel Hill, year: 2013, publisher: University of North Carolina Press, genre: History / Science. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Natures Civil War: Common Soldiers and the Environment in 1862 Virginia
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    University of North Carolina Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2013
  • City:
    Chapel Hill
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Natures Civil War: Common Soldiers and the Environment in 1862 Virginia: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Natures Civil War: Common Soldiers and the Environment in 1862 Virginia" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

In the Shenandoah Valley and Peninsula Campaigns of 1862, Union and Confederate soldiers faced unfamiliar and harsh environmental conditions--strange terrain, tainted water, swarms of flies and mosquitoes, interminable rain and snow storms, and oppressive heat--which contributed to escalating disease and diminished morale. Using soldiers letters, diaries, and memoirs, plus a wealth of additional personal accounts, medical sources, newspapers, and government documents, Kathryn Shively Meier reveals how these soldiers strove to maintain their physical and mental health by combating their deadliest enemy--nature.
Meier explores how soldiers forged informal networks of health care based on prewar civilian experience and adopted a universal set of self-care habits, including boiling water, altering camp terrain, eradicating insects, supplementing their diets with fruits and vegetables, constructing protective shelters, and most controversially, straggling. In order to improve their health, soldiers periodically had to adjust their ideas of manliness, class values, and race to the circumstances at hand. While self-care often proved superior to relying upon the inchoate military medical infrastructure, commanders chastised soldiers for testing army discipline, ultimately redrawing the boundaries of informal health care.

Kathryn Shively: author's other books


Who wrote Natures Civil War: Common Soldiers and the Environment in 1862 Virginia? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Natures Civil War: Common Soldiers and the Environment in 1862 Virginia — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Natures Civil War: Common Soldiers and the Environment in 1862 Virginia" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Natures Civil War
CIVIL WAR AMERICA
Gary W. Gallagher, Peter S. Carmichael, Caroline E. Janney, and Aaron Sheehan-Dean, editors
This book was published with the assistance of the Fred W. Morrison Fund for Southern Studies of the University of North Carolina Press.
2013 The University of North Carolina Press
All rights reserved
Set in Miller by codeMantra
Manufactured in the United States of America
The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. The University of North Carolina Press has been a member of the Green Press Initiative since 2003.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Meier, Kathryn Shively.
Natures Civil War : common soldiers and the environment in 1862 Virginia / Kathryn Shively Meier.
pages cm. (Civil War America)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-4696-1076-4 (cloth : alk. paper)
ISBN 978-1-4696-2649-9 (pbk. : alk. paper)
1. United StatesHistoryCivil War, 18611865Health aspectsVirginia. 2. United StatesHistoryCivil War, 18611865Environmental aspectsVirginia. 3. Self-care, HealthVirginiaHistory19th century. 4. Self-care, HealthUnited StatesHistory19th century. 5. Military lifeVirginiaHistory19th century. 6. Military lifeUnited StatesHistory19th century. I. Title. II. Title: Common soldiers and the environment in 1862 Virginia.
E 621. M 45 2013
973.775dc23
2013015620
Portions of this book were previously published in somewhat different form: No Place for the Sick: Natures War on Civil War Soldier Mental and Physical Health in the 1862 Peninsula and Shenandoah Valley Campaigns, Journal of the Civil War Era 1, no. 2 (2011); and The Lost Boys, Civil War Monitor 2, no. 3 (2012). Used with permission.
17 16 15 14 13 5 4 3 2 1
To
Louise, Jack, and Mark
Contents

Maps, Illustrations, Figures, and Tables
MAPS
Troop movements, Shenandoah Valley Campaign, March 23June 9, 1862,
Troop movements, Peninsula Campaign, March 17August 15, 1862,
ILLUSTRATIONS
The War in VirginiaA Reconnaissance in a Laurel Brake,
Soldiers Bathing, North Anna River, Va.Ruins of Railroad Bridge in Background,
Building Huts for the Army of the Potomac,
The Army of General Fremont on Its March up the Shenandoah ValleyWounded and Ragged Soldiers,
FIGURES
1. Number of soldiers sampled, by side and location,
2. Soldiers self-reported physical health as percentage of total, by side and location,
3. Soldiers self-reported mental health as percentage of total, by side and location,
4. Sick cases reported per 1,000 Union soldiers, JanuaryJune 1862,
TABLES
1. Overall Distribution of Self-Reported Health,
2. Correlations of Mental and Physical Health,
Acknowledgments
At one point in time, the manuscript of this book was absurdly replete with examples and unnecessarily didactic. Good-natured and highly respectable people more than did their parts in attempting to steer me back toward good history. All remaining folly is mine.
Chief among these people is Gary W. Gallagher. His advice kept me in graduate school in dark days, and his unflagging support and trust has bolstered my work and career incalculably since then. The passion and intellect he has dedicated to Civil War history make it impossible to imagine the field without him. I am profoundly grateful for his assistance on this project and astounded at my good fortune in being able to call him my mentor. Simply put, I would not be a historian if it werent for Gary.
Other scholars at the University of Virginia groomed this project when it was a mere twinkle in my eye. Edward Ayers, one of the busier men alive, set aside hours to counsel me through considerable growing pains and to sharpen the ideas contained herein. He is an intellectual force of nature and a man of boundless generosity. Edmund Russell, a leader among environmental historians, introduced me to a subfield I now cherish, and he took special care to help train me as a professional. His humility and meticulous work continue to inspire me. In an early draft, Margaret Mohrmann gently corrected my medical errors with good humor (though by no means should remaining gaffes be associated with her).
Archives and the people who run them helped to form the backbone of this project, the research. I am thankful to the special collections staff at the University of Virginia and the Library of Virginia, both treasures of Civil War collections. A large portion of my research was completed at the Military History Institute of the U.S. Army War College, where Martin Andresen gave generously of his time, despite being retired, and Richard Sommers kindly thought to check up on me. At the Museum of the Confederacy, John Coski provides a munificent welcome to all scholars and extended his resources to me. Other institutions critically provided funding for my project. The Suzanne and Caleb Loring Civil War Fellowship, which I held jointly at the Massachusetts Historical Society and Boston Athenaeum, provided invaluable research as well as comfortable spaces to ponder and write. I am sincerely indebted to Conrad Wright and also Peter Drummey, Sara Georgini, and Jeremy Dibbell at the MHS and Mary Warnement and Stephen Nonack at the Athenaeum, who provided feedback, support, and opportunities for public lectures during my stay in Boston. A well-timed Gilder Lehrman fellowship allowed me to sift through the U.S. Sanitary Commission papers at the New York Public Library, thanks to the help of Thomas Lannon, completing my research.
Mark Simpson-Vos sought out this project when I was a very green historian and then cultivated it for many years. In the process, he has proven to be an exceptional editor. At critical moments, he offered sage advice and encouragement, which helped turn the corner in a sometimes grueling journey. David Perry has also given freely of his time, while the readers reports helped to condense and refine the monograph, significantly enhancing its impacts. Series editor Peter Carmichael partook in the agony and, dare I say, the ecstasy of finally getting this manuscript off his desk. In between, he proved himself a perceptive and scrupulous editor, seeing value and complexity in my ideas of which I occasionally lost sight. Further, I am humbled and honored that this project was awarded the inaugural Edward M. Coffman First-Manuscript Prize by the Society for Military History in 2011. I delight in counting myself as one of the many young military scholars that Dr. Coffman has encouraged in his venerable career.
I consider many other readers of this project as esteemed colleagues and trusted friends. At the University of Scranton, David Dzurec has cheerfully shared with me the growing pains of developing a first manuscript. Professional opportunities brought me into contact with the infectiously ebullient Megan Kate Nelson, whose readings critically sharpened my prose and analysis, as well as the talented Aaron Sachs and his posse of discerning graduate students, who took me to task on chapter 5, and finally the munificent William Blair, whose character and scholarship inspires me. Bill is a tireless advocate of young scholars. Rachel Shelden has always championed my work, even when my own enthusiasm lagged. My career (let alone this book) would not have come to fruition without the editorial facility, wise counsel, and devoted friendship of Laura Kolar and Philip Mills Herrington. Peter Luebke is the most meticulous steward of Civil War scholarship imaginable. He has read this manuscript more times than anyone, and I am deeply obliged to and sometimes daunted by his formidable brain.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Natures Civil War: Common Soldiers and the Environment in 1862 Virginia»

Look at similar books to Natures Civil War: Common Soldiers and the Environment in 1862 Virginia. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Natures Civil War: Common Soldiers and the Environment in 1862 Virginia»

Discussion, reviews of the book Natures Civil War: Common Soldiers and the Environment in 1862 Virginia and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.