• Complain

Vrbanic - Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants

Here you can read online Vrbanic - Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2017, publisher: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, genre: Home and family. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Vrbanic Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants
  • Book:
    Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    American Society of Mechanical Engineers
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2017
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Vrbanic: author's other books


Who wrote Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Index A ASME PRA Standard of 2009 12 B Binary decision diagrams BDDs 90 - photo 1

Index

A

ASME PRA Standard of 2009, 12

B

Binary decision diagrams (BDDs), 90

Birnbaum importance, 14, 25, 40

C

CDF (core damage frequency), 16

CDF Contribution, 22, 31

CDF/LERF, 8889; see also LERF

10 CFR 50.69, 1516

Chemical and volume control system (CVCS), 45

Component-level importance measure, demonstrative examples of, 1785

Component-level importance measures for a component which is not involved in any CCF group, 4957

example, 5457

FC, 5152

introduction, 4951

RAW, 5254

RRW and reliability importance, 54

Component-level risk importance, 26

Conditional core damage probability (CCDP), 2930

CTs (Completion times), 18

risks, 1819

D

Design basis (DB) function, 910

E

Emergency feedwater turbine driven pump (EFW TDP), 49

ET (event trees), 18

F

FC (fractional contribution), 1314, 36

FT (fault trees), 18, 27

FT linking approach, 33

FT modules, 27

Fussell-Vesely (F-V) importance measure, 12, 1314, 17

H

High energy line break (HELB), 49

I

Inclusion-exclusion principle, 91

Initiating event (IE), 88

Inspection guidance, 2324

Integrated decision-making panel (IDP), 16, 17

L

LERF, 88

LERF (large early release frequency), 16, 17, 24, 88, 89

Limiting Conditions for Operations (LCOs), 18

Logic function, 43

M

MCUB (Mincut UpperBound) approximation, 112, 125, 130

Minimal cut sets (MCSs), 18, 3334

Mitigating systems performance index (MSPI), 24

N

NEI 00-04, 16, 1718, 29, 8889

NEI 97-04, 9

Non-safety-related equipment, 1516

Non-safety (non-class) SSCs, 9

NPPs (nuclear power plants)

overview, 12

safety analysis, 3, 5

technical specifications, 14

NPPs (nuclear power plants), risk assessment measures, 1130

background, 1112

risk-informed applications, 14 25

used in PRAs for NPPs, 1214, 2630

NRC Inspection Manual, 23

NRCs Maintenance Rule, 21

NRCs ROP, 2223

NUMARC 93-01, 2122

NUREG-1649, 2223

NUREG/CR-3385, 13, 14

NUREG/CR-4780, 60

NUREG/CR-5497, 73

NUREG/CR-5750, 32, 107

NUREG/CR-5845, 60, 73

NUREG/CR-6928, 3536, 107

P

Positive displacement pump (PDP), 45

PRA computer code risk importance measures by a, 101103

PRA model, examples based on a simplified, 105135

R

RAW (risk achievement worth), 13, 18, 20, 22, 28; see also Risk importance measures and RRW, 3435

Reactor oversight process (ROP), 15, 24

Risk importance measures

limitations of 8792

by a PRA computer code, 101 103

Risk importance of a component represented by multiple basic events, FT module, 4347

example, 4547

FC, RAW, RRW and reliability importance for component-level FT module, 44

introduction, 4344

Risk importance of component represented by a single basic event (failure mode) involved in a CCF Group, 5968

failure with CCF potential, 60 65

introduction, 59

particular CCf event, 6768

unavailability with no impact on CCF, 6567

Risk importance of component represented by a single basic event not involved in a CCF Group, 3141

FC for a single basic event, 3537

introduction, 3134

RAW and RRW, 3435

RAW for a single basic event, 3738

realiability importance for a single basic event, 3941

RRW for a single basic event, 39

Risk importance of component represented by multiple basic events (failure modes) involved in CCF groups, 6977

failure with CCF potential, 7376

introduction, 6973

particular CCF event, 77

unavailability with no impact no CCF, 77

RiskSpectrum, 12, 79, 101103, 105, 107108

RRW (risk reduction worth), 13, 16, 17, 20, 22, see also RAW (risk achievement worth); Risk importance measures

S

SF (Surveillance frequency), 18

risks, 2021

SRP Section 3.2.2, 10

SSC (system, structure, and component), deterministic principles of safety importance, 710; see also Risk importance measures

Station blackout (SBO), 49

Surveillance requirements (SRs), 18

T

Technical specifications (TSs) for NPPs, 18; see also NPPs (nuclear power plants)

U

USNRC (United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission), 8

Regulatory Guide 1.26, 8

Regulatory Guide 1.70, 7

Regulatory Guide 1.160, 2122

Regulatory Guide 1.174, 89

Standard review Plan (SRP), 89

Appendix A. Example from practicecalculation of risk importance measures by a PRA computer code

This section describes, as an example from the practice, how the risk importance measures for basic events are calculated by RiskSpectrum. Similar examples can be found with other PRA tools. RiskSpectrum calculates the following importance measures for the basic events [39]: Fussel-Vesely importance, risk decrease factor (RDF), fractional contribution, risk increase factor (RIF). (The quotation marks are used to point out RS terminology.) Additionally, sensitivity calculations are done which can be related to the reliability importance as discussed in this monograph.

Using the symbols from the Theory Manual [39], the Fussel-Vesely importance for the basic event i is calculated as:

where Q TOP refers to top event probability and the term Q TOP MCS including - photo 2

where Q TOP refers to top event probability and the term Q TOP ( MCS including i ) refers to the top event probability based only on the minimal cutsets which include basic event i .

The RDF (which corresponds to the RRW) is calculated as:

Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants - image 3

where Q i refers to the probability of basic event i . The term Q TOP ( Q TOP = 0) represents the top event probability recalculated with probability Q i set to zero.

The fractional contribution is calculated from RDF as:

Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants - image 4

It is noted that this equation corresponds to (5-18). Basically, the measures Fussel-Vesely importance and fractional contribution, as applied to the basic events, have the same meaning. They are distinguished because RiskSpectrum calculates them in different ways. The first one is calculated from actual contribution, the second one from its complement. In practical applications, calculated values are the same or very close to each other. (This would remain to be the case as long as all the basic events included in minimal cutsets have small probabilities.)

Finally, the RIF (which corresponds to the RAW) is calculated as:

Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants - image 5

where the term Q TOP ( Q i = 1) refers to the top event probability recalculated with probability Q i set to 1.

Sensitivity calculations for basic event i are done by dividing and multiplying the probability Q i by a sensitivity factor and recalculating the corresponding top event probabilities. (Sensitivity factor can have any value larger than 1, with default set to 10.) Calculated, also, is the sensitivity value defined as:

Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants - image 6
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants»

Look at similar books to Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants»

Discussion, reviews of the book Risk Importance Measures in the Design and Operation of Nuclear Power Plants and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.