• Complain

Edward H. Bonekemper III - How Robert E. Lee Lost the Civil War

Here you can read online Edward H. Bonekemper III - How Robert E. Lee Lost the Civil War full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 1999, publisher: Sergeant Kirklands Press, genre: Non-fiction. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Edward H. Bonekemper III How Robert E. Lee Lost the Civil War
  • Book:
    How Robert E. Lee Lost the Civil War
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Sergeant Kirklands Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    1999
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

How Robert E. Lee Lost the Civil War: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "How Robert E. Lee Lost the Civil War" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

This book challenges the general view that Robert E. Lee was a military genius who staved off inevitable Confederate defeat against insurmountable odds. Instead, the author contends that Lee was primarily responsible for the Souths loss in a war it could have won.
His theory: The North had the burden of conquering the South, a huge defensible area consisting of eleven states. The South only had to play for a tie and only had to wear down the northern will to win (as insurgents did against superior forces in the American Revolution, the Chinese Communist takeover of China, and the Vietnam War). Specifically, the South had to hold on to its precious manpower resources and convince the North to vote Lincoln out of office in 1864.
Instead, Lee unnecessarily went for the win, squandered his irreplaceable troops, and weakened his army so badly that military defeat became inevitable. Lees army took 80,000 casualties in his first fourteen months of command-the same number of troops he inherited when he took command. This crucial period of the war extended from the Seven Days Campaign, in which Lees army went on the suicidal offensive almost every day for a week; Second Bull Run/Manassas, where the final offensive charge was costly; the Antietam Campaign, which Lee initiated on his own and almost cost him his army; Fredericksburg, a lesson in slaughter that Lee failed to learn; Chancellorsville, the victory that wasnt; and finally the disastrous Gettysburg Campaign, in which he took his army on the strategic offensive and seriously damaged its future utility. With the Confederacy outnumbered four-to-one in white men of fighting age, Lees aggressive strategy and tactics proved to be suicidal.
Also noteworthy are Lees failure to take charge of the battlefield (such as the second day of Gettysburg), his overly complex and ineffective battle-plans (such as the Antietam and Seven Days campaigns), and his vague and ambiguous orders (such as those that deprived him of Jeb Stuarts services for most of Gettysburg).
Furthermore, the book describes how Lees Virginia-first myopia played a major role in crucial Confederate failures in the West. Too little attention has been paid to Lees refusals to provide reinforcements for Vicksburg or Tennessee in mid-1863, his causing James Longstreet to arrive at Chickamauga with only a third of his troops and none of his artillery, his idea to move Longstreet away from Chattanooga just before Grants troops broke through the undermanned Confederates at Missionary Ridge, and his failure to reinforce Atlanta in the critical months before the 1864 Presidential election.
Lees final failure was his continuing the hopeless and bloody slaughter after Union victory had been ensured by each of a series of events: the fall of Atlanta, the reelection of Lincoln, and the fall of Petersburg and Richmond.
This book also explores historians treatment of Lee, including the deification of him by failed Confederate generals, such as Jubal A. Early and William Nelson Pendleton, attempting to resurrect their own reputations and restore the pride of the South through creation of the Myth of the Lost Cause.
Readers and listeners are not neutral about this stinging critique of the hero of The Lost Cause.

Edward H. Bonekemper III: author's other books


Who wrote How Robert E. Lee Lost the Civil War? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

How Robert E. Lee Lost the Civil War — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "How Robert E. Lee Lost the Civil War" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

How Robert E. Lee Lost The Civil War

How Robert E. Lee Lost the Civil War

By Edward H. Bonekemper, III

Sergeant Kirkland's Press Spotsylvania, Virginia

Copyright 1999 by Edward H. Bonekemper, III

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - All Rights reserved. No part of thisbook may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronicor mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any informationstorage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.

Published & Distributed by

Sergeant Kirkland's Museum and Historical Society, Inc.

8 Yakama Trail Spotsylvania, Virginia 22553-2422 Tel. (540)582-6296; Fax: (540) 582-8312 E-mail:

www.kirklands.org

Manufactured in the USA

The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanenceand durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity ofthe Council on Library Resources, Inc.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Bonekemper, Edward H.

How Robert E. Lost the Civil War / by Edward H. Bonekemper,III p. cm.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

ISBN 1-887901-33-7 (alk. paper)

1. Lee, Robert E. (Robert Edward), 1807-1870Militaryleadership. 2. GeneralsConfederate States of AmericaBiography. 3. Command oftroops. 4. StrategyHistory19lh century. 5. United StatesHistoryCivil War, 1861-1865Campaigns. I. Title.

E467.1.L4B655 1999

973.7'3'092dc21

[B] 97-18213

CIP

123456789 10

Cover design and page layout

by Ronald R. Seagrave.

Edited by Pia Seija Seagrave, Ph.D.

Dedication

This book is dedicated to my loving and patient wife, Susan,and as a memorial to my fellow Civil War buff, Alfred W. Weidemoyer.

Table ofContents

Acknoivledgemen ts

Chapter 8

July 1863: Suicide

Preface:

at Gettysburg

Lee's Fatal Flaws

Chapter 9

Chapter 1

Late 1863: Mistakes

The Making of the Man

and Disillusion

and Soldier

Chapter 10

Chapter 2

1864: Reaping the

1861: Failure in

Whirlwind

Western Virginia

Chapter 11

Chapter 3

1865: Inevitable Defeat 181

Early Summer 1862:

Slaughter

Chapter 12

on the Peninsula

Overview

Chapter 4

Appendix I

Mid-Summer 1862:

Historians'

Costly Victory at

Treatment of Lee

Second Bull Run

Appendix II

Chapter 5

Casualties

September 1862:

in the Civil War

Disaster at Antietam

Bibliography

Chapter 6

December 1862:

Index

Fredericksburg, a Lesson

Not Learned

Chapter 7

May 1863:

Chancellorsville, the Victory

That Wasn't

Acknowledgements

During my seven years of work on this book,I have been encouraged, stimulated, challenged and assisted by a great manypeople. My wife, father-in-law, parents, co-workers and friends have patientlylistened to me excitedly describe each new idea and discovery as I read andthought about Lee and the Civil War. Without their support, this book would nothave been possible.

My wife tolerated my using my days off towrite this book instead of working around the house. A1 Weidemoyer, my latefather-in-law, and I shared over one hundred Civil War books and jointlyconcluded that Lee has been greatly overrated. I owe a special debt to mymother, Marie Bonekemper, who taught me to love reading even before I went toschool, and my father, Ed Bonekemper, who taught me the typesetting, printing,and newspaper businesses when I was in my early teens.

The Library of Congress staff was ashelpful to me as they have been to millions of other researchers and authors.Even more beneficial have been the critical reviews of my manuscript by asplendid and varied group of professionals and friends. Especially helpful werethe keen and thoughtful criticisms provided by Dr. Edwin Baldrige, formerchairman of the history department at Muhlenberg College, and Dr. HaroldWilson, chairman of the history department at Old Dominion University. EdBaldrige recently completed 40 years of inspired and humor-filled teaching, andHarold Wilson has always been a tough, but fair, critic of his students'writing.

Other indispensable reviewers were JimMacDonald, Mary Crouter and Steve Farbman. Jim's four Buckeyegreat-grandfathers all fought for the Union, and Jim brought to bear hisprofessionalism and Civil War expertise to improve my manuscript. Mary andSteve, my attorney colleagues, know what good writing is all about and helpedclarify my thinking and expression.

I also must acknowledge several otherreaders who provided valuable feedback: Dr. Virginia Litres, Jeffrey Baldino,Bill Holt, Ken Holt, Dore Hunter, and A1 Roberts. My boss, Judy Kaleta,graciously allowed me to adjust my work schedule to facilitate my writing thisbook. Historian and author Mac Wyckoff and Dr. William C. McDonald providedvital, thorough and critical reviews of my manuscript that significantlyimproved its quality.

Absolutely essential were the confidence,perseverance and skills of my publisher, Ronald R. Seagrave, and my editor, Dr.Pia Seagrave.

Lastly, vital to this book are permissionsto publish excerpts from the following publications:

From Fighting for the Confederacy: The Personal Recollectionsof General Edward Porter Alexander. Edited by Gary Gallagher. Copyright(c) 1989by the University of North Carolina Press. Used by permission of the publisher.

From Fleming, Martin K., "The Northwestern Virginia Campaignof 1861: McClellan's Rising Star Lee's Dismal Debut," Blue & GrayMagazine, X, Issue 6 (Aug. 1993), 10, 62. Copyright^) 1993 by Blue & GrayMagazine. Used by permission of the publisher.

Although this book could not have beencompleted without the generous assistance of all these people and institutions,I am solely responsible for any errors that remain.

Preface Lee'sFatal Flaws

Robert E. Lee is often described as one ofthe greatest generals who ever lived. He usually is given credit for keepingvastly superior Union forces at bay and preserving the Confederacy during thefour years of the American Civil War (1861-65).

This book presents a contrary view, a sideof the coin infrequently seen. It relies upon previously-published sources butextracts from them a more critical analysis of Lee's Civil War performance. Itgoes beyond any of the earlier critics of Lee by describing all of Lee's strategicand tactical errors, analyzing their cumulative effect, emphasizing thenegative impact he had on Confederate prospects in both the East and the West,and squarely placing on him responsibility for defeat of the Confederates in awar they should have won. More attention is given to developments in the Westthan in most books about Lee because events there spelled the ultimatemilitary doom of Lee's army and because Lee himself played an often-overlookedrole in those events.

The cult of Lee worshippers began withformer Civil War generals who had fought ineffectively under him. They soughtto polish then- own tarnished reputations and restore southern pride bydeliberately distorting the historical record and creating the myth of theflawless Robert E. Lee.1

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «How Robert E. Lee Lost the Civil War»

Look at similar books to How Robert E. Lee Lost the Civil War. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «How Robert E. Lee Lost the Civil War»

Discussion, reviews of the book How Robert E. Lee Lost the Civil War and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.