• Complain

Cain - Democracy More or Less: Americas Political Reform Quandary

Here you can read online Cain - Democracy More or Less: Americas Political Reform Quandary full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: United States, year: 2015, publisher: Cambridge University Press, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Cain Democracy More or Less: Americas Political Reform Quandary
  • Book:
    Democracy More or Less: Americas Political Reform Quandary
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Cambridge University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2015
  • City:
    United States
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Democracy More or Less: Americas Political Reform Quandary: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Democracy More or Less: Americas Political Reform Quandary" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Why do American political reform efforts so often fail to solve the problems they intend to fix? In this book, Bruce E. Cain argues that the reasons are an unrealistic civic ideal of a fully informed and engaged citizenry and a neglect of basic pluralist principles about political intermediaries. This book traces the tension between populist and pluralist approaches as it plays out in many seemingly distinct reform topics, such as voting administration, campaign finance, excessive partisanship, redistricting, and transparency and voter participation. It explains why political primaries have promoted partisan polarization, why voting rates are declining even as election opportunities increase, and why direct democracy is not really a grassroots tool. Cain offers a reform agenda that attempts to reconcile pluralist ideals with the realities of collective-action problems and resource disparities-- Read more...
Abstract: Why do American political reform efforts so often fail to solve the problems they intend to fix? In this book, Bruce E. Cain argues that the reasons are an unrealistic civic ideal of a fully informed and engaged citizenry and a neglect of basic pluralist principles about political intermediaries. This book traces the tension between populist and pluralist approaches as it plays out in many seemingly distinct reform topics, such as voting administration, campaign finance, excessive partisanship, redistricting, and transparency and voter participation. It explains why political primaries have promoted partisan polarization, why voting rates are declining even as election opportunities increase, and why direct democracy is not really a grassroots tool. Cain offers a reform agenda that attempts to reconcile pluralist ideals with the realities of collective-action problems and resource disparities

Democracy More or Less: Americas Political Reform Quandary — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Democracy More or Less: Americas Political Reform Quandary" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Democracy More or Less
Americas Political Reform Quandary

Why do American political reform efforts often fail to solve the problems they intend to fix? In this book, Bruce E. Cain argues that the reasons are an unrealistic civic ideal of a fully informed and engaged citizenry and a neglect of basic pluralist principles about political intermediaries. This book traces the tension between populist and pluralist approaches as it plays out in many seemingly distinct reform topics, such as voting administration, campaign finance, excessive partisanship, redistricting, transparency, and voter participation. It explains why political primaries have promoted partisan polarization, why voting rates are declining even as election opportunities increase, and why direct democracy is not really a grassroots tool. Cain offers a reform agenda that attempts to reconcile pluralist ideals with the realities of collective-action problems and resource disparities.

BRUCE E. CAIN is the Charles Louis Ducommun Professor of Humanities and Sciences in the political science department at Stanford University, where he also directs the Bill Lane Center for the American West. In addition to publishing numerous scholarly works, he has served as a consultant for state and local governments on constitutional and charter reform, campaign finance regulation, redistricting, and voting rights. He has received the Zale Award for Outstanding Achievement in Policy Research and Public Service and is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Cambridge Studies in Election Law and Democracy

Recent developments have pushed elections scholarship in new directions. As a result, interdisciplinary work has flourished, and political scientists and law professors have developed a more sophisticated sense of the relationship between law and politics. This series seeks to create an intellectual road map for the field, one that systematically examines the issues confronting both mature and emerging democracies. It will chart those new intellectual paths to spur interdisciplinary work, to identify productive ways in which scholars research agendas connect to policy makers reform agendas, and to disseminate this body of work to the growing audience interested in the intersection of law, politics, and democracy.

For a list of titles published in the series, please see .

Democracy More or Less
Americas Political Reform Quandary
Bruce E. Cain
Stanford University
32 Avenue of the Americas New York NY 100132473 USA Cambridge University - photo 1
32 Avenue of the Americas New York NY 100132473 USA Cambridge University - photo 2
32 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 100132473, USA
Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge.
It furthers the Universitys mission by disseminating knowledge in the pursuit of education, learning, and research at the highest international levels of excellence.
www.cambridge.org
Information on this title:www.cambridge.org/9781107612266
Bruce E. Cain 2015
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
First published 2015
Printed in the United States of America
A catalog record for this publication is available from the British Library.
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
Cain, Bruce E.
Democracy more or less : Americas political reform quandary / Bruce Cain,
Stanford University.
pages cm. (Cambridge studies in election law and democracy)
ISBN 978-1-107-03963-6 (hardback)
1. Democracy United States. 2. Representative government and representation
United States. 3. Political culture United States. 4. Political participation
United States. 5. Polarization (Social sciences) United States. I. Title.
JK1726.C35 2014
320.973dc23 2014018137
ISBN 978-1-107-03963-6 Hardback
ISBN 978-1-107-61226-6 Paperback
Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party Internet Web sites referred to in this publication and does not guarantee that any content on such Web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
Contents
Acknowledgments

Normally, authors, when recognizing those who have aided them in the production of their book, absolve them of any blame for its weaknesses. With respect to my editors, Heather Gerken, Guy-Uriel Charles, and Michael Kang, I can do the first, but not the second. Heather and Guy in particular lobbied me until I undertook this project and so must share the blame with me for this. All three provided many comments and directed the rewrites. Next on the list are Rick Pildes and Sam Issacharoff, who despite decades of enduring my complaints about their work, invited me to spend a year at the NYU Law School as a Straus Fellow to write the book. I am indebted to them. Similarly, Dennis Thompson has had to put up with my skepticism in the past, but nonetheless provided me with many useful comments and the title for the book. At NYU, I profited from comments and discussions with Nancy Rosenblum, Bernard Grofman, and Alessandra Casella especially. John Ferejohn was an initial reader and provided many thoughts about the book, as he always does so ably. Ned Foley and Dan Tokaji were instrumental in this enterprise, providing me with a symposium at Ohio State about my book and comments as well. I am very grateful to them and to their colleagues, Michael Neblo, Piers Turner, Paula Baker, Stphane Lavertu, and Daphne Meimaridis. Richard Hasen, Michael Shenkman, Lee Drutman, Mark Rush, Genevieve Lester, Denis Lacorne, Gillian Peele, Frederick Douzet, and Thad Kousser all provided me with encouragement and much feedback. My Stanford colleagues Larry Diamond, Frank Fukuyama, Stephen Stedman, Morris Fiorina, Tino Cuellar, David Hayes, Matt McCubbins, Alberto Diaz-Cayeros, Daniel Stid, Larry Kramer, Nate Persily, and Didi Kuo gave me valuable reactions. Finally, while my wife, Jody Foster, could not bring herself to read the entire book, she did get through enough to conclude that it got better.

The Ascendancy of Reform Populism

Americans have tried repeatedly to improve their political system in various ways. They have extended voting rights to women and racial minorities, ensured more regular presidential rotation, replaced indirect with direct Senate elections, and regulated congressional pay by constitutional amendments. State and local governments have experimented with nonpartisan elections, the citizens initiative, recall, referendum, participatory budgeting, and city manager government. Political jurisdictions at all levels have passed measures to reduce material corruption, control campaign finance, improve government ethics, and lessen government secrecy. The result is a complex assortment of limits, prohibitions, and requirements that regulate many facets of political activity.

American political improvement is also highly institutionalized. Nonprofit reform groups abound some with broad agendas, such as Common Cause, the League of Women Voters, U.S. PIRG, and the Brennan Center, and others with more specific democratic goals, such as Open Secrets and Open the Government (transparency), the Fund for Constitutional Government (effective government oversight), No Labels (lessened partisanship), OMB Watch (fiscal responsibility), Democracy 21 and the Campaign Legal Center (tighter lobbying and campaign finance controls), and Little Sis and the Center for Voting and Democracy (better voting procedures). But despite some notable reform achievements, there is a nagging doubt about all of this activity: is America truly making progress, or is the goal of achieving a less imperfect democracy simply futile?

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Democracy More or Less: Americas Political Reform Quandary»

Look at similar books to Democracy More or Less: Americas Political Reform Quandary. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Democracy More or Less: Americas Political Reform Quandary»

Discussion, reviews of the book Democracy More or Less: Americas Political Reform Quandary and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.