Manuel London - How people evaluate others in organizations
Here you can read online Manuel London - How people evaluate others in organizations full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2001, publisher: Routledge, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:
Romance novel
Science fiction
Adventure
Detective
Science
History
Home and family
Prose
Art
Politics
Computer
Non-fiction
Religion
Business
Children
Humor
Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.
- Book:How people evaluate others in organizations
- Author:
- Publisher:Routledge
- Genre:
- Year:2001
- Rating:5 / 5
- Favourites:Add to favourites
- Your mark:
How people evaluate others in organizations: summary, description and annotation
We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "How people evaluate others in organizations" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.
Manuel London: author's other books
Who wrote How people evaluate others in organizations? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.
How people evaluate others in organizations — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work
Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "How people evaluate others in organizations" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
Cover
| title | : | How People Evaluate Others in Organizations Series in Applied Psychology |
| author | : | London, Manuel. |
| publisher | : | Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. |
| isbn10 | asin | : | 080583611X |
| print isbn13 | : | 9780805836110 |
| ebook isbn13 | : | 9780585376929 |
| language | : | English |
| subject | Psychology, Industrial, Social perception. | |
| publication date | : | 2001 |
| lcc | : | HF5548.8.H65 2001eb |
| ddc | : | 158.7 |
| subject | : | Psychology, Industrial, Social perception. |
Page i
Page ii
SERIES IN APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY
Edwin A. Fleishman, George Mason University,
Jeanette N. Cleveland, Pennsylvania State University
Series Editors
Gregory Bedny and David Meister
The Russian Theory of Activity: Current Applications to Design and Learning
Michael T. Brannick, Eduardo Salas, and Carolyn Prince
Team Performance Assessment and Measurement: Theory, Research, and Applications
Jeanette N. Cleveland, Margaret Stockdale, and Kevin R. Murphy
Women and Men in Organizations: Sex and Gender Issues at Work
Russell Cropanzano
Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management, Volume I
Russell Cropanzano
Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice, Volume 2
James E. Driskell and Eduardo Salas
Stress and Human Performance
Sidney A. Fine and Steven F. Cronshaw
Functional Job Analysis: A Foundation for Human Resources Management
Sidney A. Fine and Maury Getkate
Benchmark Tasks for Job Analysis: A Guide for Functional Job Analysis (FJA) Scales
J. Kevin Ford, Steve W. J. Kozlowski, Kurt Kraiger, Eduardo Salas, and Mark S. Teachout
Improving Training Effectiveness in Work Organizations
Jerald Greenberg
Organizational Behavior: The State of the Science
Uwe E. Kleinbeck, Hans-Henning Quast, Henk Thierry, and Hartmut Hcker
Work Motivation
Martin I. Kurke and Ellen M. Scrivner
Police Psychology into the 21 st Century
Page iii
Manuel London
Job Feedback: Giving, Seeking, and Using Feedback for Performance Improvement
Manuel London
How People Evaluate Others in Organizations
Manuel London
Leadership Development: Paths to Self-Insight and Professional Growth
Robert F. Morrison and Jerome Adams
Contemporary Career Development Issues
Michael D. Mumford, Garnett Stokes, and William A. Owens
Patterns of Life History: The Ecology of Human Individuality
Kevin R. Murphy and Frank E. Saal
Psychology in Organizations: Integrating Science and Practice
Ned Rosen
Teamwork and the Bottom Line: Groups Make a Difference
Heinz Schuler, James L. Farr, and Mike Smith
Personnel Selection and Assessment: Individual and Organizational Perspectives
John W. Senders and Neville P. Moray
Human Error: Cause, Prediction, and Reduction
Page iv
This page intentionally left blank
Page v
HOW PEOPLE EVALUATE OTHERS IN ORGANIZATIONS
Edited by
Manuel London
State University of New York at Stony Brook
Page vi
Copyright 2001 by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
All right reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by photostat, microfilm, retrieval system, or any other means, without prior written permission of the publisher.
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers
10 Industrial Avenue
Mahwah, NJ 07430
Cover design by Kathryn Houghtaling Lacey
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
How people evaluate others in organizations / edited by Manuel London.
p. cm. (Applied psychology)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-8058-3611-X (cloth : acid-free paper) ISBN 0-8058-3612-8 (pbk. : acid-free paper)
1. Psychology, Industrial. 2. Social perception. I. London, Manuel. II. Series in applied
psychology.
HF5548.8 .H65 2001
158.7dc21
00-065402
Books published by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates are printed on acid-free paper, and their bindings are chosen for strength and durability.
Printed in the United States of America
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Page vii
Series Foreword Edwin A. Fleishman | ix |
Preface | xi |
About the Authors | xv |
I SOCIAL COGNITION AND PERSON PERCEPTION | |
1 Person Perception in Organizations: An Overview of the Field Richard J. Klimoski and Lisa M. Donahue | |
2 Causes and Consequences of Stereotypes in Organizations Don Operario and Susan T. Fiske | |
II SELECTION | |
3 Person Perception in Employment Interviews Charles K. Parsons, Robert C. Liden, and Talya N. Bauer | |
4 Executive Promotion and Selection Valerie I. Sessa | |
5 The Role of Dimensions and Exercises in Assessment Center Judgments Paul R. Sackett and Kathleen A. Tuzinski | |
III APPRAISAL | |
6 Performance Appraisal: Person Perception Processes and Challenges Janet L. Barnes-Farrell | |
7 Multisource Feedback Ratings: What Do They Really Measure? Michael K. Mount and Steven E. Scullen |
Page viii
IV DEVELOPMENTAL PROCESSES | |
8 Leadership and Perceiver Cognition: Moving Beyond First Order Constructs Douglas J. Brown and Robert G. Lord | |
9 Training Effectiveness: Assessing Training Needs, Motivation, and Accomplishments Kurt Kraiger and Herman Aguinis | |
10 Coaching in Organizations James W. Smither and Susanne P. Reilly | |
11 Understanding, Assessing, and Intervening with Problem Employees Zvi Strassberg | |
V INTERPERSONAL INTERACTIONS | |
12 Cultural Frames and Values Affecting Employment Practices Sumita Raghuram | |
13 Frame Attribution and Positional Framing in Negotiation Jeff T. Casey | |
14 Group Dynamics and Shared Mental Model Development Stephen M. Fiore, Eduardo Salas, and Janis A. Cannon-Bowers | |
15 Virtual Teams: Implications for E-Leadership and Team Development Bruce J. Avolio, Surinder Kahai, Rex Dumdum, and Nagaraj Sivasubramaniam |
Font size:
Interval:
Bookmark:
Similar books «How people evaluate others in organizations»
Look at similar books to How people evaluate others in organizations. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.
Discussion, reviews of the book How people evaluate others in organizations and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.