• Complain

Melissa Haussman - Gendering the State in the Age of Globalization: Womens Movements and State Feminism in Postindustrial Democracies

Here you can read online Melissa Haussman - Gendering the State in the Age of Globalization: Womens Movements and State Feminism in Postindustrial Democracies full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2007, publisher: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Melissa Haussman Gendering the State in the Age of Globalization: Womens Movements and State Feminism in Postindustrial Democracies
  • Book:
    Gendering the State in the Age of Globalization: Womens Movements and State Feminism in Postindustrial Democracies
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2007
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Gendering the State in the Age of Globalization: Womens Movements and State Feminism in Postindustrial Democracies: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Gendering the State in the Age of Globalization: Womens Movements and State Feminism in Postindustrial Democracies" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Gendering the State is a ground-breaking collection of studies that examines the efforts of women in countries all over the world to frame public policy debates on nationally critical issues in gendered terms. The overall study is grouped into three distinct patterns of state change: state downsizingparticularly in social policy areas (Canada, Finland, the Netherlands, the United States, and Spain); expansion of state activities into previously less-regulated areas (Austria, France, Germany, and Sweden); and transformationoften constitutionally basedof representative structures (Australia, Belgium, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom). Examination of these patterns reveals the impact of the changes in state structures and national priorities on the effectiveness and ability of womens movement actors in achieving their goals.

Melissa Haussman: author's other books


Who wrote Gendering the State in the Age of Globalization: Womens Movements and State Feminism in Postindustrial Democracies? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Gendering the State in the Age of Globalization: Womens Movements and State Feminism in Postindustrial Democracies — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Gendering the State in the Age of Globalization: Womens Movements and State Feminism in Postindustrial Democracies" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Table of Contents Appendix A WORKSHEET 1 SELECTION OF POLICY DEBATES - photo 1
Table of Contents

Appendix A
WORKSHEET 1: SELECTION OF POLICY DEBATES FOR STUDY

STEP 1: Issue Area Universe of Top-priority Policy Debates

BASE CRITERIA: (1) debates take place in public arenas such as the legislature, courts, news media, policy party conferences, or electoral campaigns; (2) debates occur when a womens policy agency is in existence; (3) debates end with an official state decision, including, for instance, legislation, an executive order, a court ruling, or a government policy proposal.

List universe of at least four policy debates that meet all the following criteria:

Major scope: A large portion of society could be affected by the proposed policy change.

High degree of conflict: The policy debate engages the major socio-political actors (political elites, political parties, social partners, interest groups, movements).

Wide range of public attention: The policy debate generates public interest as demonstrated through public opinion polls, demonstrations, strikes, public conferences, media coverage and the like.

Top priority of major policy actors: The proposed policy is high on the agendas of the political executive and political party leaders.

Universe of Top-priority Debates Listed:

STEP 2: Selection of debate

Select one debate from the top-priority universe that involves major changes to state/society relations, such as:

Selective down sizing government?

Devolution of policy to regional/local governments?

Devolution of social responsibilities from state to civil society?

Marketization of state policies?

Shifting of policymaking to new networks?

Expansion of state activities in response to technological change?

Debate selected ________________________________

For debate selected, give evidence of the following:

SCOPE

CONFLICT

PUBLIC ATTENTION

PRIORITY

WORKSHEET 2: POLICY DEBATE INFORMATION
  1. Policy Debate
  2. Appeared on Public Agenda
  3. Endpoint Government Decision
  4. WPA(s) in Existence Over Period of Time
  5. Debate Sites: Organizations/Level of Government
  6. Documents and Other Sources Used
  7. Describe Policy Debate in Three Stages
    • Dominant frame at the beginning of debate
    • How frame changes
    • frame at the end of debate

    What is the problem? What is it that needs fixing? (wrong; injustice; threat; situation that needs corrective action, etc.)

    Who is to blame for the problem?

    What should be done? Corrective Action

    Content of Gendered Debate:

    1. Images of women and what they are like.
    2. How men and women are different from each other. How men and women are NOT different.
    3. The ways gender systems shape situations/identities.
    4. How to correct? Challenges to male domination? Challenges to traditional gender roles? Is gendered debate feminist?
  8. Gendering and Policy Debate
    1. Who presented gendered issues? (groups, individuals, networks, publics, WPAs, womens movement, trade unions, etc.)
    2. Centrality of gendering to the debate?
    3. Effect on law and legislation?
    4. What was the position of the womens movement on this policy debate?
  9. Womens Participation (How did women participate in this policy debatenot necessarily feminist womenand did they advocate some aspect of womens interests in the debate?)

    Individuals
    Groups
    Networks
    Publics

WORKSHEET 3: VALUES FOR MODEL VARIABLES

Policy Debate Name and Dates

Endpoint Government Decision

  1. IVI-WM Womens Movement

    Mapping the WM: What are the major organizations, movements, individuals, and the major ideas espoused by this constellation of actors? The following information should be gathered as well:

    1. Stage (emerging/re-emerging, growth, consolidaton, decline/abeyance)
    2. Closeness of WMO to the left and/or political parties/groups that espouse social equality
    3. Strength of counter-movement
    4. Priority of issue to movement agenda
    5. Cohesion of movement
  2. IVII-PE Policy Environment

    Policy subsystem:

    1. Structure: Who are the major actors, dominant structures, and patterns of interaction? (open, moderatley closed, closed)
    2. Dominant Discourse Fit: What is the dominant discourse used by the policy actors in the subsystem? To what degree does it fit with the positions of the womens movement and WPAs? (Matching, compatible, incompatible)
    3. Party in Power/Coalition
  3. INTERVENING VARIABLE:

    Womens Policy Agency Characteristics (if more than one WPA, information should be gathered on each):

    Scope (single issue, cross-sectional, other?):

    Type (political, administrative, other?):

    Proximity (position in government hierarchy):

    Administrative Capacity (budget, staff, administrative divisions, field offices, womens group subsidies, etc.):

    Individual Leadership (feminist, political, bureaucratic, etc.):

    Policy Mandate (major policy orientations):

    Womens Policy Agency Activities (Insider, Marginal, Non-Feminist, Symbolic)

    WPA-Gendered Policy Debate?

    WPA-Promoted Womens Movement Goals?

  4. DEPENDENT VARIABLE

    Womens Movement Impact (Dual Response, Co-optation, Pre-emption, No Response)

    Were women (individuals, group networks, constituencies) advanced? Was some aspect of womens interests accepted in the policymaking process?

    Policy action achieved womens movement goals or not?

Bibliography
BIBLIOGRAPHY

247,000 nieuwe Belgen, De Standaard, 15 June 2005, p. 5.

Aalto, Terhi. Kuka vie? Naiset, politiikka ja pivhoitolainsdnt. Tapaukset pivhoidon subjektiivinen oikeus 1994 ja kotihoidon tuen leikkaus 1995. Masters thesis, University of Helsinki, 2003.

Abe, Hitoshi. Seijigaku Nyumon. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1996.

Abramovitz, Mimi. Regulating the Lives of Women: Social Welfare Policy from Colonial Times to the Present. Boston: South End Press, 1988.

Abramovitz, Mimi. Under Attack, Fighting Back: Women and Welfare in the United States. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1996.

Accornero, Aris, and Como Eliana. La (mancata) riforma dellart.18. Pp. 23962 in Politica in Italia. I fatti dellanno e le interpretazioni. Edizione 2003, edited by Jean Blondel and Paolo Segatti. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2003.

Ackers, H. Louise. Shifting Spaces: Women, Citizenship and Migration within the European Union. Bristol: Policy Press, 1997.

Alanen, Riitta. Pivhoidon yhteyksist naisten asemaan ja perheeseen. Pivhoitokeskustelun piirteit 1970-luvun Suomessa. Masters thesis, University of Helsinki, 1981.

Algemene Directie Werkgelegenheid en Arbeidsmarkt. De Immigratie in Belgi Aantallen, Stromen En Arbeidsmarkt: Rapport 2001. Brussel: Algemene Directie Werkgelegenheid en Arbeidsmarkt, 2003.

Algemene Rekenkamer. Zorgen voor toegankelijkheid in de ouderen-en gehandicaptenzorg. Den Haag: Algemene Rekenkamer, 2002.

Allwood, Gill, and Kursheed Wadia. French Feminisms: National and International Perspectives. Modern and Contemporary France 10, no. 2 (2002): 21123.

Allwood, Gill, and Kursheed Wadia. Women and Politics in France. London: Routledge, 2000.

Amazone, Nederlandstalige Vrouwenraad, Sophia and Vrouwen Overleg Komitee. De toekomst begint vandaag Perspectieven voor de vrouwenbeweging (based on database of survey of womens organizations) Referaten/Rapport Brussel: Amazone, 2002.

Ambler, John. Conflict and Consensus in French Education. Pp. 199230 in Chiracs Challenge: Liberalization, Europeanization, and Malaise in France, edited by John T.S. Keeler and Martin Schain. New York: St. Martins Press, 1996.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Gendering the State in the Age of Globalization: Womens Movements and State Feminism in Postindustrial Democracies»

Look at similar books to Gendering the State in the Age of Globalization: Womens Movements and State Feminism in Postindustrial Democracies. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Gendering the State in the Age of Globalization: Womens Movements and State Feminism in Postindustrial Democracies»

Discussion, reviews of the book Gendering the State in the Age of Globalization: Womens Movements and State Feminism in Postindustrial Democracies and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.