• Complain

Geroulanos - An Atheism That Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought

Here you can read online Geroulanos - An Atheism That Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Stanford;Calif;France, year: 2010;2011, publisher: Stanford University Press, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Geroulanos An Atheism That Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought
  • Book:
    An Atheism That Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Stanford University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2010;2011
  • City:
    Stanford;Calif;France
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

An Atheism That Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "An Atheism That Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

This book seeks to explain the critiques of humanism and the negative philosophical anthropologies that dominated mid-century philosophy and traces the appearance of a new, non-humanist atheism in twentieth-century French thought.;Introduction : bourgeois humanism and a first death of man -- The anthropology of antifoundational realism : philosophy of science, phenomenology and human reality in France, 1928-1934 -- No humanism except mine! : ideologies of exclusivist universalism and the new men of interwar France -- Alexandre Kojves negative anthropology, 1931-1939 -- Inventions of antihumanism, 1935 : phenomenology, the critique of transcendence, and the kenosis of human subjectivity in early existentialism -- Introduction : the humanist mantle, restored and retorn -- After the resistance (1) : engagement, being and the demise of philosophical anthropology -- Atheism and freedom after the death of God : Blanchot, Catholicism, literature, and life -- After the resistance (2) : Merleau-Ponty, communism, terror and the demise of philosophical anthropology -- Man in suspension : Jean Hyppolite on history, being, and language.

Geroulanos: author's other books


Who wrote An Atheism That Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

An Atheism That Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "An Atheism That Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Table of Contents Acknowledgments I wrote the original version of this - photo 1
Table of Contents

Acknowledgments

I wrote the original version of this book while at the Humanities Center at Johns Hopkins University in 20052007, and then a second, restructured, and longer version after joining New York Universitys History Department in 2008. I would like to first thank Hent de Vries and Anson Rabinbach for their extraordinary advice and direction throughout. Hent has contributed much of the force and fine-tuning of this books philosophical voice. Since my undergraduate years, Andyin equal measure generous, supportive, and criticalhas been a wonderful guide to history and its demands on philosophy. At the Humanities Center, Michael Fried, Ruth Leys, Paola Marrati, Neil Hertz, and Richard Macksey, but also Samantha Fenno, Nils Schott, Molly Warnock, and many others showed me trust, critique, encouragement, and friendship; they made my time and study there a singular learning experience. Sam Moyn offered very useful comments on the first complete version of the book, as did Martin Jay on the penultimate draft. I would also like to thank David A. Bell, Peter Gordon, Denis Hollier, Jean-Luc Marion, Jacques Neefs, Molly Nolan, Arkady Plotnitsky, Pamela Reynolds, Jerrold Seigel, Gabrielle Spiegel, and Arnd Wedemeyer, who have, in public or private, been generous in their reading and criticisms of the books chapters. In Paris, Giuseppe Bianco, Marc Crpon, Michel Dguy, Denis Gunoun, Claude Imbert, Eric Michaud, Frdric Worms, and the late Stphane Moss directed me toward important realizations and research finds; so did Franoise Coblence, who hosted me during no fewer than three research visits and whose amazing hospitality and friendship are very dear to me.

In my research, I have benefited from the help of many librarians and archivists: M. Vasen (EHESS Centre Alexandre Koyr); G. Fau, Fl. de Lussy, and M.-O. Germain (Bibliothque Nationale); Father R. Bonfils (Archives Jsuites), Cl. Paulhan (IMEC-Wahl); the librarians at the Bibliothque Littraire J. Doucet; M. Handzo and S. Waterman at the M.S. Eisenhower Library at Johns Hopkins; and Andrew Lee at NYUs Bobst Library. I have made considerable use of texts from these archives, and I would like to thank Mmes. Batrice Wahl, Edith Heurgon, and Nina Kousnetzoff, respectively, for allowing me to use and reference materials from the archives of Jean Wahl, the Centre Culturel International de Cerisy, and Alexandre Kojve. A Charlotte W. Newcombe Fellowship from the Woodrow Wilson Foundation in 20052006 provided the support for the first draft of the book. I have presented portions of this book during lectures and conferences at the Centre International des Etudes de la Philosophie Franaise Contemporaine of the Ecole Normale Suprieure, the Centre des Etudes Europennes of the Ecole Nationale dAdministration in Strasbourg, the 2006 American Comparative Literature Association conference, the 2007 Modern Language Association conference, the Comparative Literature Department at the University at Buffalo, the Department of French at Yale University, the History Department at NYU, the Davis Center for Historical Studies at Princeton, and the New York Area Seminar for Intellectual History. I am very grateful to participants at these talks for their criticisms. Fragments of my An Anthropology of Exit ( October 117 [summer 2006]) have been considerably altered for use in Chapter 4; a part of Chapter 6 appeared in my essay Transparency Thinking Freedom: Maurice Blanchots The Most High in MLN 122, no. 5 (December 2007). At Stanford University Press, I owe a debt to Emily-Jane Cohen who welcomed the book, Tim Roberts who shepherded it through production, and Alex Giardino, who copyedited it. Sona Arutyunyan offered helpful comments at the very last stage of corrections. My thanks also to The Criterion Collection for permitting the use of the still from Renoirs La Rgle du jeu on the books cover.

I have left for last friends and family who have shown me that this kind of work was worth the effort and can have a future. Chrysanthi Moraiti-Kartali and my late grandmother Sarah Carouso in different ways launched my studies; I am so thankful to them and saddened that Sarah is not here to see this conclusion. My sister Sarra and my late brother Alexis participate, in very different ways, in the thoughts that went into these pages. Joyce Tsai has been a close friend and exacting reader for a decade now. Nicole Jerr has changed the way I think about writing and about the implications of what I have been writing about, with a style and grace that are distinctly hers. Since my arrival in New York, Larry Wolff has been a great friend and mentor, and he has opened worlds for me. Richard Baxstrom and Todd Meyers are comrades, co-conspirators, rare friends: to look back at the writing of this book is both to remember those first years thinking and laughing together and to watch our other conspiracies that are only now beginning to unfold. Throughout my studies and work, my wife Rania has been and is the light and smile of my days and nights; the effort that went into this book would not be worth it if it were not for her brilliance and her elegance and her excitement and her love. Above all, that this work has come to being is a direct consequence of my parents effort and sacrifices throughout my studies. They supported and guided me without once complaining about or questioning the path I chose and, most importantly, without always understanding what I did and why, and what I sought to achieve. Dedicating this book to them is a very small expression of my love and gratitude.


Baltimore, Paris, Delaportata, New York, 20052009

Conclusion

Throughout the present work, I have sought to offer a history of the emergence of a new atheism unbound by humanism, by interplaying a general tripartite (theological, philosophical, critical) structure with a series of philosophically significant moments in its elaboration. Central among these have been (a) the emergence of antifoundational realism, its dismantling of subjectivity, and its participation in a profound transformation of philosophy of science and philosophy of nature; (b) the political and philosophical undoing of idealism and classical humanism, primed in particular by the competition between the different and ostensibly exclusive humanisms of Communists, nonconformists, and Catholics; (c) the construction of new terms and radical limitations for anthropotheism, which articulate an erasure of man in a universe bereft of God; (d) the undoing of classical transcendence and the existentialist (and antihumanist) sense of entrapment; and (e) the postwar emergence of new, minimal humanisms, and their rejection by phenomenologists and some literary authors as insufficient, still violent, and incapable of even understanding the terms of their hope and promise. I have tried to intersperse with these themes a number of further problems: the offering and fares of Catholic anti-anthropocentrism beyond the Christian confine; the undoing of utopia and the elaboration of philosophical and political antimessianisms; new genealogies of modern thought; the transforming interplay of violence and sovereignty; the abandoning of ideals of a harmonious secular society; the critical rethinking of transparency as a scientific and social goal; the reception of Martin Heidegger and G. W. F. Hegels thought; and the transformation of models of the philosophy of history and the understanding of French modernity.

From the emergence of antifoundational realism in the 1930s through the effort to move from anthropology to ontology in the late 1940s and early 1950s, the transformation and impact of the new philosophical claims on man was at once slow and monumental. Importantly, what matters in this philosophical system is not that the new atheism and philosophical anthropology overcame humanismby and large, they did not. Merleau-Pontys stance toward the human and its future is so explicitly and broadly ambiguous regarding violence as to deal only with difficulty against humanist accusations of advocating it. No less significantly, if the conflict of humanisms persisted well into the 1960s and the literary appropriation of antihumanist tropes came to express and echo in broader terms what philosophical, scientific, and critical thought claimed, at the same time the need for some minimal humanism became necessary throughout the period and came to characterize not only philosophy but also a public opinion removed from many of the stakes expressed here but still concerned with problems of social policy, Catholicism, communist violence, colonialism, and so on.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «An Atheism That Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought»

Look at similar books to An Atheism That Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «An Atheism That Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought»

Discussion, reviews of the book An Atheism That Is Not Humanist Emerges in French Thought and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.