• Complain

National Rifle Association of America. - Armed in America: a history of gun rights from colonial militias to concealed carry

Here you can read online National Rifle Association of America. - Armed in America: a history of gun rights from colonial militias to concealed carry full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: United States, year: 2018;2017, publisher: Prometheus Books, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

National Rifle Association of America. Armed in America: a history of gun rights from colonial militias to concealed carry

Armed in America: a history of gun rights from colonial militias to concealed carry: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Armed in America: a history of gun rights from colonial militias to concealed carry" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

This illuminating study traces the transformation of the right to arms from its inception in English and colonial American law to todays impassioned gun-control debate. As historian and legal scholar Patrick J. Charles shows, what the right to arms means to Americans, as well as what it legally protects, has changed drastically since its first appearance in the 1689 Declaration of Rights. Armed in America explores how and why the right to arms transformed at different points in history. The right was initially meant to serve as a parliamentary right of resistance, yet by the ratification of the Second Amendment in 1791 the right had become indispensably intertwined with civic republicanism. As the United States progressed into the 19th century the right continued to change ... this time away from civic republicanism and towards the individual-right understanding that is known today, albeit with the important caveat that the right could be severely restricted by the governments police power. Throughout the 20th century this understanding of the right remained the predominant view. But working behind the scenes was the beginnings of the gun-rights movement ... a movement that was started in the early 20th century through the collective efforts of sporting magazine editors and was eventually commandeered by the National Rifle Association to the gun-rights movement known today. Readers looking to sort through the shrill rhetoric surrounding the current gun debate and arrive at an informed understanding of the legal and historical development of the right to arms will find this book to be an invaluable resource ...

National Rifle Association of America.: author's other books


Who wrote Armed in America: a history of gun rights from colonial militias to concealed carry? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Armed in America: a history of gun rights from colonial militias to concealed carry — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Armed in America: a history of gun rights from colonial militias to concealed carry" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
I am indebted to a number of historians and legal professionals for their - photo 1

I am indebted to a number of historians and legal professionals for their friendship, mentorship, guidance, and support over the years. This includes Adele Alexander, David Armitage, Muriel Atkin, Richard L. Aynes, Stephen Banks, Josh Blackman, Joseph Blocher, Nemata Blyden, James S. Cockburn (deceased), Saul Cornell, Thomas Y. Davies, Nora V. Demleitner, Garrett Epps, Paul Finkelman, David F. Forte, Mark Frassetto, Ranjit Hakim, Tim Harris, Peter Hoffer, Woody Holton, James Horton, Calvin H. Johnson, Stanley N. Katz, Erin Rahne Kidwell, David Thomas Konig, Nathan Kozuskanich, Edward G. Lengel, Suzanne Loose, Robert E. Mensel, Darrell A. H. Miller, Kevin F. O'Neill, William O'Reilly, Willian Pencak (deceased), J. G. A. Pocock, Jack N. Rakove, Francine Radford, Michael Rappaport, Reggie Robinson, Rachel E. Rosenbloom, David Rubenstein, Mike Sacks, Priya Satia, Michael A. Scaperlanda, Peter H. Schuck, Lois G. Schwoerer, Quentin Skinner, Lawrence Solum, Steven H. Steinglass, Juliet Stumpf, Mary Thompson, Jennifer Tucker, Tess Webber, Judy Weiss, Geoffrey Wyatt, and I am sure others who escape me at this moment.

Much of the material in this book could not have been accessed if not for the assistance of others, including Kelvin Chan, Jordan Gusich, and a number of institutions, such as Duke University, Florida State University, George Washington University, Indiana University, Louisiana State University, Michigan State University, Ohio State University, University of Houston, University of Kansas, University of Maryland, University of Pittsburgh, University of Virginia, New York Public Library, British National Archives, Herbert Block Foundation, Billy Ireland Cartoon Library and Museum, John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum, Lyndon B. Johnson Presidential Library, Society of the Cincinnati, Kansas Historical Society, Wisconsin Historical Society, and the Library of Congress.

A special thanks to my agent, Alexa Stark, for taking on this project. And last but not least, I want to acknowledge my close friends, colleagues and coworkers within the special operations community, and family for their continued help and support, and my canine writing companionsAJ, TJ, and Bennyfor listening to me write out loud for more than a decade. And, of course, a special thanks is due to my spouse, Nadejda Demiscan Charles, for putting up with me during the long process of writing this book, all the while being pregnant with our daughter and dealing with the added stress of building our first home.

In 1993 Pulitzer Prizewinning editorial cartoonist Herbert L Block published - photo 2

In 1993, Pulitzer Prizewinning editorial cartoonist Herbert L. Block published Daily Sacrifices, depicting the victims of gun violence being carried to the base of a handgun monument. Inscribed on the base is In Guns We Trust. Considering Block's larger body of editorial work, it is clear that Block is advocating on behalf of stricter firearm controls. At the same time, perhaps unbeknownst to Block when he drew it, by incorporating the motto In Guns We Trust the cartoon captured the heart of the longstanding debate over the Second Amendmentthat is, what does the right to keep and bear arms afford the American people, and what is the proper role that firearms should play in American society. It is a debate that transcends ideological, ethical, political, legal, and cultural lines. It also a debate about what constitutes American values. It is a debate more commonly known as gun rights versus gun control.

Before delving into this debate, it is worth mentioning how American views on the ownership, availability, and use of firearms vary greatly. Views can vary dependent upon race, sexual orientation, whether the individual owns firearms, and so forth. They just disagree on whether the problem should be solved by loosening or strengthening firearm controls.

Herb Block The Daily Sacrifices 1993 This image was reprinted with - photo 3

Herb Block, The Daily Sacrifices, 1993. This image was reprinted with permission from the Herb Block Foundation.

To most foreigners, it is astonishing that Americans portray the subject of gun violence in terms of gun rights versus gun control. From their perspective, gun violence can be easily solved by instituting strict firearm controls.

Foreign amusement over the amount of violence in the United States is not a twenty-first century phenomenon. It has been ongoing for nearly two centuries. During the Antebellum Era, when French aristocrat Alexis de Tocqueville set out on an extensive tour of the United States, he observed that there was a greater propensity for violence among Americans living in the South than those living in the Historic Northeast.

As the United States progressed into twentieth century, Tocqueville's and Dickens's observations were still relevant. The homicide and crime rates of the South were more than twice as high as the Historic Northeast, and the homicide and crime rates of the United States were more than ten times that of other developed countries.

While many Americans are quick to dismiss foreign criticisms as just thatforeignthey often do so in haste. Granted, foreigners are generally socialized under a different system of government, but it is worth considering the statistics. The United States maintains less than five percent of the world's

Another observation worth considering is federal inaction in preventing or curtailing the problem. Despite gun violence being one of the top two non-disease-related causes of death in the United States, Congress has failed to pass any comprehensive firearms legislation or controls since the 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban (AWB), which expired in 2004. As the late Massachusetts Democratic senator Edward M. Kennedy once put it, the United States is internationally known for being first in guns, last in controls.

There is even an argument to be made that Congress has intentionally turned a blind eye to curtailing gun violence. In 1996 for instance, Congress not only cut the Center for Disease Control's (CDC) budget to study gun violence but also barred the CDC from using federal funding to take a position on gun control.

In recent years, a growing number of congressmen have endorsed two federal firearms bills that would materially alter longstanding gun-control norms. The first federal firearms bill would encroach upon the state governments more than two century monopoly on concealed-carry regulations. Rather than each state government controlling who may carry concealed firearms, the proposed federal firearms bill would allow concealed-carry license holders in one state to carry a concealed firearm in any other state, regardless of how lax the qualification requirements in the state issuing the license might be.

This is not to say that there has been complete congressional inaction in trying to prevent or curtail gun violence. Due largely to the rise of mass shootings since 2002, some members of Congress have called for a debate on gun control, and have even tried advancing a myriad of gun-control measures. However, in every instance such efforts were defeated at the behest of gun-rights advocates.

The recent mass shooting in Las Vegas, Nevadathe deadliest mass shooting in modern American historymay prove to be a turning point. On the night of October 1, 2017, Stephen Paddock, armed with nearly two dozen firearms, shot from the thirty-second floor of the Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino into a Route 91 Harvest Festival crowd of nearly 22,000 people, killing more than fifty people and wounding another five hundred.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Armed in America: a history of gun rights from colonial militias to concealed carry»

Look at similar books to Armed in America: a history of gun rights from colonial militias to concealed carry. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Armed in America: a history of gun rights from colonial militias to concealed carry»

Discussion, reviews of the book Armed in America: a history of gun rights from colonial militias to concealed carry and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.