• Complain

Rood - After gun violence: deliberation and memory in an age of political gridlock

Here you can read online Rood - After gun violence: deliberation and memory in an age of political gridlock full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: United States, year: 2019, publisher: Pennsylvania State University Press, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Rood After gun violence: deliberation and memory in an age of political gridlock
  • Book:
    After gun violence: deliberation and memory in an age of political gridlock
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Pennsylvania State University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2019
  • City:
    United States
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

After gun violence: deliberation and memory in an age of political gridlock: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "After gun violence: deliberation and memory in an age of political gridlock" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Mass shootings have become the new normal in American life. The same can be said for the public debate that follows a shooting: blame is cast, political postures are assumed, but no meaningful policy changes are enacted. InAfter Gun Violence, Craig Rood argues that this cycle is the result of a communication problem. Without advocating for specific policies, Rood examines how Americans talk about gun violence and suggests how we might discuss the issues more productively and move beyond our current, tragic impasse.
Exploring the ways advocacy groups, community leaders, politicians, and everyday citizens talk about gun violence, Rood reveals how the gun debate is about far more than just guns. He details the role of public memory in shaping the discourse, showing how memories of the victims of gun violence, the Second Amendment, and race relations influence how gun policy is discussed. In doing so, Rood argues that forgetting and misremembering this history leads interest groups and public officials to entrenched positions and political failure and drives the public further apart.
Timely and innovative,After Gun Violenceadvances our understanding of public discourse in an age of gridlock by illustrating how public deliberation and public memory shape and misshape one another. It is a search to understand why public discourse fails and how we can do better.

Rood: author's other books


Who wrote After gun violence: deliberation and memory in an age of political gridlock? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

After gun violence: deliberation and memory in an age of political gridlock — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "After gun violence: deliberation and memory in an age of political gridlock" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

EDITED BY CHERYL GLENN AND STEPHEN BROWNE THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY - photo 1

EDITED BY CHERYL GLENN AND STEPHEN BROWNE THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY - photo 2

EDITED BY CHERYL GLENN AND STEPHEN BROWNE

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY

Cofounding Editor: J. Michael Hogan

Editorial Board:

Robert Asen (University of WisconsinMadison)

Debra Hawhee (The Pennsylvania State University)

J. Michael Hogan (The Pennsylvania State University)

Peter Levine (Tufts University)

Steven J. Mailloux (University of California, Irvine)

Krista Ratcliffe (Arizona State University)

Karen Tracy (University of Colorado, Boulder)

Kirt Wilson (The Pennsylvania State University)

David Zarefsky (Northwestern University)

Rhetoric and Democratic Deliberation focuses on the interplay of public discourse, politics, and democratic action. Engaging with diverse theoretical, cultural, and critical perspectives, books published in this series offer fresh perspectives on rhetoric as it relates to education, social movements, and governments throughout the world.

A complete list of books in this series is located .

After Gun Violence
Deliberation and Memory in an Age of Political Gridlock

CRAIG ROOD

The Pennsylvania State University Press | University Park, Pennsylvania

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Names: Rood, Craig, 1985 author.

Title: After gun violence : deliberation and memory in an age of political gridlock / Craig Rood.

Other titles: Rhetoric and democratic deliberation.

Description: University Park, Pennsylvania : The Pennsylvania State University Press, [2019] | Series: Rhetoric and democratic deliberation | Includes bibliographical references and index.

Summary: A rhetorical study of the American political debate on gun violence and gun policy. Examines the role of public memory in shaping this discourse and its eventual policy outcomesProvided by publisher.

Identifiers: LCCN 2019005851 | ISBN 9780271083834 (cloth : alk. paper)

Subjects: LCSH: Firearms and crimeUnited States. | Violent crimesUnited States. | Mass shootingsUnited States. | FirearmsGovernment policyUnited States. | Collective memoryUnited States. | RhetoricUnited States.

Classification: LCC HV7436.R66 2019 | DDC 364.150973dc23

LC record available at: https://lccn.loc.gov/2019005851

Copyright 2019 Craig Rood

All rights reserved

Published by The Pennsylvania State University Press,

University Park, PA 16802-1003

The Pennsylvania State University Press is a member of the Association of University Presses.

focus too on all the planes that do not crash

all the spaces that are indeed safe

all the vehicles that do not collide

all the hugs exchanged

all the love that does indeed pass between persons

remember that because it can happen anywhere doesnt mean it is

going to happen anywhere in particularwhere you and your loved ones

areat any particular time

love and reason

and a steady hand

Rosa A. Eberly, Towers of Rhetoric

Contents

I gratefully acknowledge permission to use revised versions of two previously published essays. has been adapted from The Racial Politics of Gun Violence: A Brief Rhetorical History, in Was Blind but Now I See: Rhetoric, Race, Religion, and the Charleston Shootings, ed. Sean Patrick ORourke and Melody Lehn (Lanham, MD: Lexington, forthcoming).

Crafting this book has been a long process, and I am grateful to the many people who have helped at different stages. Thanks to everyone involved with the Rhetoric and Democratic Deliberation series at Pennsylvania State University Press, including press editors Kendra Boileau and Ryan Peterson, series editors Cheryl Glenn and Stephen Browne, and the two peer reviewers (who elected to disclose their names), Robert Asen and Kendall Phillips. Their thoughtful readings and encouragement have helped make this a better book. Thanks as well to the team at Scribe Inc. for their excellent work during the final stages of preparing this manuscript (copyediting, proofreading, creating an index).

Thanks to everyone in the Department of English and Program in Speech Communication at Iowa State University. Ben Crosby (now at Brigham Young University) helped me get this project off the ground. During our periodic lunches around Ames, we puzzled through the process of writing any book, and he helped me test out ideas for how to write this one. Near the end of this process, Lori Peterson, editor extraordinaire, provided a close reading of the entire manuscript. And throughout the process, I have been inspired by my colleagues and buoyed by their questions, suggestions, and encouragement. Special thanks to Lesley Bartlett, Barbara Ching, Abby Dubisar, Sean Grass, Charlie Kostelnick, Anne Kretsinger-Harries (and Mark!), Maggie LaWare, Prashant Rajan, Brandon Sams, Matt Sivils, and Jeremy Withers. Finally, the department, college, and university deserve praise for their efforts to support and mentor junior faculty. In particular, the College of Liberal Arts and Sciencess Humanities Scholarship Enhancement Initiative freed up time in fall 2016 to make progress on this project. And the Iowa State University Publication Endowment Fund (ISU Foundation) provided a subvention grant to support the publication of this book.

Outside of Iowa State, several people have provided valuable feedback and encouragement on various pieces of this book, even though they might not recognize its current form. Thanks to Brian Amsden, Earl Brooks, Mark Hlavacik, Mike Hogan, Bill Keith, Melody Lehn, Andrew Mara, Sean Patrick ORourke, Sam Perry, Billy Saas, Jack Selzer, Brad Serber, Mary Stuckey, Kirt Wilson, and David Zarefsky.

Since this is my first book, I feel like I need to thank every single teacher who has helped me up to this point. Three of them deserve special recognition for inspiring me with their intense intelligence and unparalleled generosity. Lee Kruger introduced me to rhetoric in a composition class during my first year of college (and read my first essay on the gun debate). Amy Rupiper Taggart, who died far too young, encouraged me to go to graduate school, taught me how to teach, and then advised me through my masters program. Rosa Eberly advised me through my doctoral program. I have learned much from her about gun violence and rhetoric. On and off the page, Rosas example provides a regular reminder of Wayne Booths claim that the quality of our lives, moment by moment, depends upon the quality of our rhetoric.

Thanks to all my family. Special thanks to my parents, Brenda and Rodney, whose love and support have been constant. Without your encouragement, I sincerely doubt whether I would have ever gone to college, let alone graduate school. As a teenager growing up in North Dakota, I spent many weekends with my dad shooting at targets and hunting gophers, ducks, and deer. Although I have since chosen not to own or use guns, I value the time we spent together, and I think those early experiences have helped me write a better book. Thank you both for everything. Thanks also to Lauras familyespecially her parents, Keith Brown and Martha Bransonfor your questions about my research and for welcoming me into your family.

And then there is my favorite personLaura Michael Brown. Without you, this book would not exist. Youve been there every day, optimistic when I needed it most (and critical when I did not realize thats what I needed). Thanks for reading all those drafts and for all our conversations. Thanks, too, for reminding me that there is life outside of my office. I am so grateful that you sent me that Kenneth Burke article all those years ago and that we have gotten to spend our lives together.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «After gun violence: deliberation and memory in an age of political gridlock»

Look at similar books to After gun violence: deliberation and memory in an age of political gridlock. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «After gun violence: deliberation and memory in an age of political gridlock»

Discussion, reviews of the book After gun violence: deliberation and memory in an age of political gridlock and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.