• Complain

Julian M. Pleasants - Frank Porter Graham and the 1950 Senate Race in North Carolina

Here you can read online Julian M. Pleasants - Frank Porter Graham and the 1950 Senate Race in North Carolina full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2017, publisher: UNC Press Books, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover

Frank Porter Graham and the 1950 Senate Race in North Carolina: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Frank Porter Graham and the 1950 Senate Race in North Carolina" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The tumultuous North Carolina Senate primaries of 1950 are still viewed as the most bitter chapter in the states modern political history. The central figure in that frenzied race was the appointed incumbent, Frank Porter Graham, former president of the University of North Carolina (1931-49) and liberal activist of national stature.
As a Senate candidate, Graham was unrelentingly attacked for both his social activism and his racial views, and the vicious tactics used against him shocked his supporters and alarmed national observers. Peeling away the myths that have accumulated over the years, the authors present the first thoroughly researched account of Grahams eventual defeat by Raleigh attorney Willis Smith. The result, a balanced study of North Carolina politics at mid-century, is a convincing explanation of the 1950 election.
Using the campaign as a prism, the authors assess the factional struggles within the state, showing that Graham was defeated by a massive loss of support among white voters in eastern North Carolina. The principal force behind this switch was the fear promulgated by the Smith campaign that a vote for Graham was a vote to end statutory segregation in North Carolina. The authors also offer the fullest portrait to date of Frank Porter Graham as political candidate and social reformer. They examine his career as an educator and public activist, the steps that led to his unorthodox appointment, and his strengths and weaknesses as a political candidate.
Frank Porter Graham and the 1950 Senate Race in North Carolina is based on manuscript materials never before examined, on interviews with more than 50 campaign participants and associates of both Graham and Smith, and on a thorough analysis of newspaper coverage and campaign literature.
Originally published in 1990.
A UNC Press Enduring Edition -- UNC Press Enduring Editions use the latest in digital technology to make available again books from our distinguished backlist that were previously out of print. These editions are published unaltered from the original, and are presented in affordable paperback formats, bringing readers both historical and cultural value.

Julian M. Pleasants: author's other books


Who wrote Frank Porter Graham and the 1950 Senate Race in North Carolina? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Frank Porter Graham and the 1950 Senate Race in North Carolina — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Frank Porter Graham and the 1950 Senate Race in North Carolina" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Frank Porter Graham and the 1950 Senate Race in North Carolina
The Fred W. Morrison
Series in Southern Studies
1990 The University of North Carolina Press
All rights reserved
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Pleasants, Julian M.
Frank Porter Graham and the 1950 Senate race in North Carolina /
by Julian M. Pleasants and Augustus M. Burns III.
p. cm.(The Fred W. Morrison series in Southern studies)
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN 0-8078-6583-4 (alk. paper)
1. North CarolinaPolitics and government18651950.
2. ElectionsNorth CarolinaHistory20th century. 3. Graham,
Frank Porter, 1886. 4. United States. Congress. Senate
Elections, 1940. 5. North CarolinaRace relations. I. Burns,
Augustus Merrimon, 1939. II. Title. III. Series.
F259.P64 1990 90-50011
324.9756043dc20 CIP
The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources.
Design by April Leidig-Higgins
Manufactured in the United States of America
94 93 92 91 90 5 4 3 2 1
For
Donna Marie Bishop
and Katherine Mills Burns
whose support, patience, and unstinting
affection have enabled us to see
this book to completion.
Contents
Illustrations
Preface
The Senate primaries between Frank Porter Graham and Willis Smitha political fight that stirred the state of North Carolina in 1950first came to our scholarly attention when we were graduate students at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. We were each pursuing research topics tangentially related to the Smith-Graham race, and independently we noted the interest and appeal of this contest as a possible research project. Our scholarly interest in the campaign was no doubt spurred by our own boyhood memories of it, shadowed though they were by the far more critical exploits of Charlie Justice and his teammates on the gridirons of Kenan Stadium and fields beyond.
When we began our study in earnest in the mid-1980s, we were confident that we could complete the project in three years. Early on we were disabused of that folly. As we researched, we found a corpus of primary materials far more extensive than we had envisioned. Many of the manuscripts we located had never been examined by researchers, some becoming accessible only as we were working. Others, including the mountain of materials in the Frank Porter Graham collection in the Southern Historical Collection at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, had never been combed for Grahams 1950 Senate campaign. To mention three of the many collections we examined, we were the first scholars to utilize the papers of Allard K. Lowenstein, Daniel A. Powell, and Charles W. and Gladys A. Tillett, also in the Southern Historical Collection, as they related to the 1950 Senate race. We located other manuscripts, as our bibliography indicates, and were able to compose the bulk of our study from these primary sources.
We also found our conversations with campaign participants and their associates to be of immeasurable value. Especially useful were our interviews with Smith partisans, a number of whom were both cooperative and forthright in their discussions with us. To observe firsthand the hold that this race continues to exert on its surviving participantsSmith and Graham supporters alikeis to be reminded of the depth of emotions and beliefs that this contest aroused.
The interviews with Smith supporters were critical to our research because, despite our persistent efforts, we could not persuade members of the Smith family to lift the seal on their fathers papers, which are housed at Duke University. On three separate occasions we sought access to the papers of Willis Smith. First, we wrote a formal letter of request to the late Dr. Mattie Russell, then director of manuscript collections at Duke. Dr. Russell added her strong support to our request when she submitted it to the Smith family, but to no avail. We next contacted Willis Smiths son Lee, who again denied us access to the papers. After a time, we appealed to the Smith family through James K. Dorsett, Jr., Smiths former law partner and the husband of Smiths daughter Anna Lee. Mr. Dorsett explained our need to examine the papers but conveyed our intention to proceed with our study even without them. The family turned us down yet again, and at this point, we yielded. Upon completion of the manuscript, however, we offered family members, through Mr. Dorsett, an opportunity to review our work for factual accuracy, which they declined. In the summer of 1990, we were finally allowed to read the papers, but the materials on the 1950 campaign proved to be insubstantial.
The refusal of the Smith family to cooperate with us was our major research disappointment, although some campaign participants would not discuss the race with us. Neither Smith workers John Anderson and Tom Ellis nor Lee Smith would talk to us. On the Graham side, only former Graham Senate aide John D. McConnell refused our request for an interview. Other participants we approached were cooperative, including many Smith partisans. James K. Dorsett, Jr., J. C. B. Ehringhaus, Jr., Jesse A. Helms, William T. Joyner, Jr., Richard Thigpen, and others shared their reminiscences with us to our great benefit.
Graham supporters whose remembrances were especially helpful included R. Mayne Albright, J. Melville Broughton, Jr., Kathryn N. Folger, William C. Friday, Kate Humphries, David M. McConnell, Terry Sanford, and the indomitable Roy Wilder, Jr. Our bibliography includes the names of many others whose assistance we value, but who are too numerous to mention here. The opportunity to meet and talk with these North Carolinians was itself a rewarding personal and historical experience.
We also found rich newspaper coverage of the campaign. North Carolina dailies and weeklies alike followed the primaries unrelentingly, as did national papers and syndicated columnists, many of whom came to North Carolina to observe the race firsthand. At times it seemed as if North Carolina papers were covering little else. These newspapers were important not only because they followed the race day-to-day, but also because a number of journalists and editors were fierce partisans and participants. D. Hiden Ramsey of the Asheville Citizen, Jonathan Worth Daniels of the Raleigh News and Observer, Louis Graves of the Chapel Hill Weekly, and H. Galt Braxton of the Kinston Daily Free Press were four editors who were ardent Graham backers and confidants. Indeed, Jonathan Danielss support of both Graham and Governor William Kerr Scott, while he was a member of the Democratic National Committee, made Daniels himself a campaign issue, as did the partisan coverage by his familys newspaper. In the Smith inner circle were Robert L. Thompson of the High Point Enterprise, John Park of the Raleigh Times, and Lynn Nisbet, a Raleigh political columnist syndicated in many of the states afternoon dailies.
In their editorials and commentary, these newspapers often offered insights into campaign strategy that no other source revealed, a point of special significance for information about the Smith campaign. For despite the abundance of manuscript sources relating to other aspects of this race, a paucity of Smith materials confronts the researcher. In addition, newspapers were the forums in which the rival campaigns lodged their major charges and responses in political advertisements. Half-page ads were ordinary in this race, and full-page statements in papers throughout the state were not unusual. Newspaper advertising in this contest was far more important than radio spots (some recordings of which survive), handbills, or any other type of formal political exchange. (Candidate debates were not a part of this race.) The heavy reliance on advertising further heightened the pivotal role of newspapers in this Senate primary.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Frank Porter Graham and the 1950 Senate Race in North Carolina»

Look at similar books to Frank Porter Graham and the 1950 Senate Race in North Carolina. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Frank Porter Graham and the 1950 Senate Race in North Carolina»

Discussion, reviews of the book Frank Porter Graham and the 1950 Senate Race in North Carolina and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.