• Complain

Paolo Dardanelli - Between Two Unions: Europeanisation and Scottish Devolution

Here you can read online Paolo Dardanelli - Between Two Unions: Europeanisation and Scottish Devolution full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2006, publisher: Manchester University Press, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Paolo Dardanelli Between Two Unions: Europeanisation and Scottish Devolution
  • Book:
    Between Two Unions: Europeanisation and Scottish Devolution
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Manchester University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2006
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Between Two Unions: Europeanisation and Scottish Devolution: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Between Two Unions: Europeanisation and Scottish Devolution" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Paolo Dardanelli: author's other books


Who wrote Between Two Unions: Europeanisation and Scottish Devolution? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Between Two Unions: Europeanisation and Scottish Devolution — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Between Two Unions: Europeanisation and Scottish Devolution" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Between two Unions
Europeanisation and Scottish devolution
DEVOLUTION series series editor Charlie Jeffrey already published - photo 1
DEVOLUTION series series editor Charlie Jeffrey already published - photo 2DEVOLUTION series
series editor Charlie Jeffrey
already published
Territorial politics and health policy
UK health policy in comparative
perspective Scott L. Greer
Devolution has established new political institutions in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, London and the other English regions since 1997. These devolution reforms have far-reaching implications for the politics, policy and society of the UK. Radical institutional change, combined with a fuller capacity to express the UKs distinctive territorial identities, is reshaping the way the UK is governed and opening up new directions of public policy. These are the biggest changes to UK politics for at least 150 years.
The Devolution series brings together the best research in the UK on devolution and its implications. It draws together the best analysis from the Economic and Social Research Councils research programme on Devolution and Constitutional Change. The series will have three central themes, each a vital component in understanding the changes devolution has set in train.
1. Delivering public policy after devolution, diverging from Westminster. Does devolution result in the provision of different standards of public service in health or education, or in widening economic disparities from one part of the UK to another? If so, does it matter?
2. The political institutions of devolution. How well do the new devolved institutions work? How effectively are devolved and UK-level matters coordinated? How have political organisations which have traditionally operated UK-wide political parties, interest groups responded to multi-level politics?
3. Public attitudes, devolution and national identity. How do people in different parts of the UK assess the performance of the new devolved institutions? Do people identify themselves differently as a result of devolution? Does a common sense of Britishness still unite people from different parts of the UK?
Between two Unions
Europeanisation and Scottish devolution
Paolo Dardanelli
Copyright Paolo Dardanelli 2005 The right of Paolo Dardanelli to be identified - photo 3
Copyright Paolo Dardanelli 2005
The right of Paolo Dardanelli to be identified as the author of this work has been
asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
Published by Manchester University Press
Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9NR, UK
and Room 400, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA
www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk
Distributed exclusively in the USA by
Palgrave, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York,
NY 10010, USA
Distributed exclusively in Canada by
UBC Press, University of British Columbia, 2029 West Mall,
Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z2
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data applied for
ISBN 978 0 7190 7080 8
First published 2005
14 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Typeset by Servis Filmsetting Ltd, Manchester
Printed in Great Britain
by CPI, Bath
Contents
Figures and tables
Figures
A three-level Europeanisation model
The systemic shift, 197997
Tables
Importance of self-government by party identification, 1979
Support for self-government by party identification, 1979
Referendum vote by party identification, 1979
Interpretation of the referendum result by party identification, 1979
Referendum vote of supporters of self-government, 1979
Most important disadvantage of devolution by constitutional preference, 1979
Attitudes to independence by party identification, 1979
Attitudes to the status quo and to independence among supporters of devolution, 1979
Perceived effect of SNP on devolution by party identification, 1979
Attitudes to the UK by party identification, 1979
Attitudes to the EU by party identification, 1979
Logistic regression models of No voting in the 1979 referendum
Importance of self-government by party identification, 1997
Support for self-government by party identification, 1997
Referendum vote by party identification, 1997
Referendum vote of supporters of self-government, 1997
Parliaments most important thing not to do by vote in the referendum, 1997
Second preference of supporters of devolution by party identification, 1997
Attitudes to the UK by party identification, 1997
Attitudes to the EU by party identification, 1997
Logistic regression models of Yes voting in the 1997 referendum
Acknowledgements
This book started life as a doctoral thesis for the London School of Economics and I owe a very great deal to the encouragement, support and assistance I received from many people and institutions for a number of years. The Economic and Social Research Council and the Department of Government of the London School of Economics awarded me Research Studentships (ESRC No. R00429824368), without which the research on which this book is based would have never been completed. I am grateful to the policy-makers who agreed to be interviewed and to the librarians and archivists who endured my requests, in particular Sean Townsend of the LSE Data Library, Elizabeth Canning of the STUC archive in Glasgow and Sarah Charlton of the House of Commons. For valuable comments and suggestions, I am indebted to the organisers and participants of the UACES Annual Conference in Glasgow in January 1999, the UACES workshop in Belfast in June 2000 and the ECPR Joint Sessions in Grenoble in April 2001 as well as to the convenors and participants in the doctoral workshops at the LSE, in particular Antonia Dodds, Claire Sutherland, Lee McGowan, Eiko Thielemann, Howard Elcock, Michael Keating, Pieter van Houten, Rodney Barker, 5ebastian Balfour, Abby Innes and Chris van Stolk. Simon Hix, George Jones, James Mitchell, Joanne Wright, Charlie Jeffery, Thomas Saalfeld and Clive Church, as well as the staff and referees at Manchester University Press, have read parts of the book or the whole of it and have given me scholarly advice and personal encouragement for which I am most grateful to them. I would also like to thank my fellow PhD students at the LSE with whom I shared the PS2/3 research room and all the difficult and joyous moments of doing doctoral research, in particular: Thibaut Kleiner, Leonidas Makris, Susana Berruecos, Francisco Chico Gaetani, Geeta Kulshrestha, Razmik Panossian, Zhand Shakibi, Adam Tebble and Nebojsa Vladisavljevic. My thanks also go to Marco and Kaori Costantino, Stefano and Manuela Saldini, Edoardo and Silvia Faganello and Daniela Orsetti who offered friendship and understanding throughout these, sometimes difficult, years. Wendy Jenkins was by my side for most of the time offering support and much more which was of great help in completing this work. Finally, my deepest thanks are to my parents, Matteo Dardanelli and Giovanna Altana, who first taught me to love the pursuit of knowledge and have offered unwavering support ever since.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Between Two Unions: Europeanisation and Scottish Devolution»

Look at similar books to Between Two Unions: Europeanisation and Scottish Devolution. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Between Two Unions: Europeanisation and Scottish Devolution»

Discussion, reviews of the book Between Two Unions: Europeanisation and Scottish Devolution and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.