• Complain

Juan Williams - Muzzled: The Assault on Honest Debate

Here you can read online Juan Williams - Muzzled: The Assault on Honest Debate full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2011, publisher: Crown, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Muzzled: The Assault on Honest Debate
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Crown
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2011
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Muzzled: The Assault on Honest Debate: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Muzzled: The Assault on Honest Debate" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

You cant say that. Youre fired. Prize-winning Washington journalist Juan Williams was unceremoniously dismissed by NPR for speaking his mind and saying what many Americans feelthat he gets nervous when boarding airplanes with passengers dressed in Muslim garb. NPR banished the veteran journalist in an act of political correctness that ultimately sparked nationwide outrage and led to calls for Congress to end its public funding of the media organization. In Muzzled, Williams uses his very public firing as a launching pad to discuss the countless ways in which honest debate in Americafrom the halls of Congress and the health care town halls to the talk shows and print mediais stifled. In todays partisan world, where media provocateurs rule the airwaves and political correctness dictates what can and cannot be said with impunity, Williams shows how the honest exchange of ideas and the search for solutions and reasonable compromise is deliberately muzzled. Only those toeing the partys linethe screaming voices of the extremistget airtime and dominate the discussion in politics and the media. Each side, liberal and conservative, preaches to a choir that revels in expressions of anger, ideology, conspiracies, and demonized opponents. The result is an absence of truth-telling and honest debate about the facts. Among the issues denied a full-throated discussion are racial profiling; the increased reliance on religious beliefs in debating American values and legislation; the nuances of an immigration policym gone awry; why abortion is promoted as a hot button wedge issue to incite the pary faithful and drive donations; the uneasy balance between individual freedom and our desire for security of against terrorism; and much more. A fierce, fresh look at the critical importance of an open airing of controversial issues, Muzzled is a hard hitting critique of the topics and concerns we cant talk about without suffering retaliation at the hands of the politically correct police. Only by bringing such hot button issues into the light of day can we hope to grapple with them, and exercise our cherished, hard-won right of free speech.

Muzzled: The Assault on Honest Debate — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Muzzled: The Assault on Honest Debate" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
ALSO BY JUAN WILLIAMS Enough Thurgood Marshall Eyes on the Prize This - photo 1

ALSO BY JUAN WILLIAMS

Enough

Thurgood Marshall

Eyes on the Prize

This Far by Faith

My Soul Looks Back in Wonder

Ill Find a Way or Make One

Copyright 2011 by Juan Williams All rights reserved Published in the United - photo 2

Copyright 2011 by Juan Williams

All rights reserved.
Published in the United States by Crown Publishers, an imprint of the Crown Publishing Group, a division of Random House, Inc., New York.
www.crownpublishing.com

CROWN and the Crown colophon are registered trademarks of Random House, Inc.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Williams, Juan.
Muzzled: the assault on honest debate / Juan Williams.
p. cm.
1. Freedom of speechUnited States. 2. Political correctnessUnited States. 3. Williams, JuanPolitical and social views. I. Title.
JC591.W55 2011
323.4430973dc22
2011016800

eISBN: 978-0-307-95203-5

Jacket design by Ben Gibson

v3.1

This book is dedicated to Crown Books, Fox News, FoxNews.com, The Hill newspaper, thehill.com, and the American Program BureauGuiding Lights in the stormstanding tall in the faith that speaking the truth is the heart of great journalism.

For why should my freedom be judged by anothers conscience?

1 CORINTHIANS 10:29

CONTENTS
Chapter 1
I Said What I Meant
Chapter 2
Defying the PC Police
Chapter 3
Partisan Politics
Chapter 4
9/11 and Other Man-Caused Disasters
Chapter 5
Tax Cuts, Entitlements, and Health Care
Chapter 6
Immigration, Terror Babies, and Virtual Fences
Chapter 7
The Abortion Wars
Chapter 8
The Provocateurs
Chapter 9
The Limits of Free Speech
CHAPTER 1
I SAID WHAT I MEANT

I AM A BIGOT. I hate Muslims. I am a fomenter of hate and intolerance. I am a black guy who makes fun of Muslims for the entertainment of white racists. I am brazen enough to do it on TV before the largest cable news audience in America. And I am such a fraud that while I was spreading hate to a conservative audience at night I delivered a totally different message to a large liberal morning-radio audience. I fooled the radio folks into thinking of me as a veteran Washington correspondent and the author of several acclaimed books celebrating Americas battles against racism.

My animus toward Muslims may be connected to my desire for publicity and the fact that I am mentally unstable. And I am also a fundamentally bad person. I repeatedly ignored warnings to stop violating my companys standards for news analysis. And I did this after repeated warnings from my patient employer. Therefore, my former employers made the right decision when they fired me. In fact, they should be praised for doing it, and rewarded with taxpayer money. Their only sin was that they didnt fire me sooner.

This is just a sampling of some of the reaction to National Public Radios decision to fire me last year after a ten-year career as a national talk show host, senior correspondent, and senior news analyst. They were not taken from the anonymous comments section of a YouTube page or the reams of hate mail that flooded my in-box in the days before the firing. No, this is the response from the NPR management whom I had served with great success for nearly a decade. It is also the reaction from national advocacy groups like the Council for American Islamic Relations (CAIR), whose work I had generally admired and occasionally defended over the years. Joining them was a small, knee-jerk mob of liberal commentators, including a New York Times editorial writer, who defended NPR as an important news source deserving federal funding even if it meant defaming mehe made foolish and hurtful remarks about Muslims. Cable TV star Rachel Maddow, a fervent champion of free speech, agreed that I had a right to say what was on my mind, but in her opinion the comments amounted to bigotry. I had a right to speak but no right to keep [my] job. NPR also found support among leftist intellectuals who regularly brag about defending the rights of the little guy but had no problem siding with a big institution over an individual journalist when the journalist was me. One writer said I had long ingratiated myself with conservatives and I had gotten what was coming to me. His conclusion about me: Sleep with dogs, get fleas.

What did I do that warranted the firing and the ad hominem attacks that preceded and followed?

I simply told the truth.

Looking back on the torrential media coverage surrounding my dismissal, I am struck by how little of it tells the full story of what actually happened. Basic facts were distorted, important context was not provided, and personal attacks were treated as truth. The lack of honest reporting about the firing and the events that led up to it was not just unfairmost of it was flat-out lies.

In this first chapter, I will tell you the full story of what happened to me. My purpose in doing this is not to get people to feel sorry for me. The goal of this book is to set the record straight and to use my experience in what amounts to a political and media whacking as the starting point for a much-needed discussion about the current, sad state of political discourse in this country. It is time to end the ongoing assault against honest debate in America.

This story begins with a typical Monday night for me. I went to the Fox News Channels bureau in Washington, DC, to do a satellite interview for Bill OReillys prime-time show, The OReilly Factor. I have appeared on Bills show hundreds of times since I joined Fox in 1997. The drama here is watching me, a veteran Washington journalist with centrist liberal credentials, enter the lions den to debate the fiery, domineering, right-of-center OReilly. When I do the show I am almost always paired with a conservative or Republican guest. My usual jousting partner is Mary Katharine Ham, a conservative writer. This strikes some critics as stacking the deck by having two conservatives take me on. In reality the combination offers viewers a range of opinions, because OReilly is unpredictable. He listens and admits when he is wrong. Ham is an honest debate partner who is willing to call them as she sees them and to veer off any conservative party line. If the deck is stacked, its because there can be no doubt that this is Bills party and he runs the show. The audience tunes in to see him, and they keep tuning in because they love his cranky but vulnerable personality. He is a star and he can be intimidating, but I see no need to back down in a debate and I genuinely respect him. I think he respects me too. Along with Mary Katharine, Bill and I share a sense that we can disagree without the personal attacks and put-downs. I hear from viewers that the segment is a hit because they learn something from watching people with different political convictions and viewpointsbut also with affection for each othertry to make sense of emotional, political issues. We dont play the cheap TV debate trickoften used to stoke TV political debate shows and soap operasof creating false tensions by shouting over each other and calling each other liars. We treat each other as sincere people with integrity and the courage of our convictions. But make no mistake, we are painfully direct with each other. To survive on the show, youd better know how to think quickly and counter-punch with a fast, pithy point or youll be left behind with less time to talk, reduced to what Bill calls a pinhead.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Muzzled: The Assault on Honest Debate»

Look at similar books to Muzzled: The Assault on Honest Debate. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Muzzled: The Assault on Honest Debate»

Discussion, reviews of the book Muzzled: The Assault on Honest Debate and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.