• Complain

Joshua Gans - Innovation + Equality: How to Create a Future That Is More Star Trek Than Terminator

Here you can read online Joshua Gans - Innovation + Equality: How to Create a Future That Is More Star Trek Than Terminator full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2019, publisher: MIT Press, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Innovation + Equality: How to Create a Future That Is More Star Trek Than Terminator
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    MIT Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2019
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Innovation + Equality: How to Create a Future That Is More Star Trek Than Terminator: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Innovation + Equality: How to Create a Future That Is More Star Trek Than Terminator" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

How to get more innovation and more equality.

Is economic inequality the price we pay for innovation? The amazing technological advances of the last two decadesin such areas as artificial intelligence, genetics, and materialshave benefited society collectively and rewarded innovators handsomely: we get cool smartphones and technology moguls become billionaires. This contributes to a growing wealth gap; in the United States; the wealth controlled by the top 0.1 percent of households equals that of the bottom ninety percent. Is this the inevitable cost of an innovation-driven economy? Economist Joshua Gans and policy maker Andrew Leigh make the case that pursuing innovation does not mean giving up on equalityprecisely the opposite. In this book, they outline ways that society can become both more entrepreneurial and more egalitarian.

All innovation entails uncertainty; theres no way to predict which new technologies will catch on. Therefore, Gans and Leigh argue, rather than betting on the future of particular professions, we should consider policies that embrace uncertainty and protect people from unfavorable outcomes. To this end, they suggest policies that promote both innovation and equality. If we encourage innovation in the right way, our future can look more like the cheerful techno-utopia of Star Trek than the dark techno-dystopia of TheTerminator.

Joshua Gans: author's other books


Who wrote Innovation + Equality: How to Create a Future That Is More Star Trek Than Terminator? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Innovation + Equality: How to Create a Future That Is More Star Trek Than Terminator — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Innovation + Equality: How to Create a Future That Is More Star Trek Than Terminator" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Contents
Guide
Pagebreaks of the print version
Innovation Equality How to Create a Future That Is More Star Trek Than - photo 1

Innovation + Equality

How to Create a Future That Is MoreStar TrekThanTerminator

Joshua Gans and Andrew Leigh

Foreword by Lawrence H. Summers

The MIT Press

Cambridge, Massachusetts

London, England

2019 Joshua Samuel Gans and Andrew Keith Leigh

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher.

This book was set in Stone Serif and Stone Sans by Westchester Publishing Services. Printed and bound in the United States of America.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Names: Gans, Joshua, 1968- author. | Leigh, Andrew, 1972- author.

Title: Innovation + equality : how to create a future that is more star trek than terminator / Joshua Gans and Andrew Leigh ; foreword by Lawrence H. Summers.

Other titles: Innovation plus equality

Description: Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, [2019] | Includes bibliographical references and index.

Identifiers: LCCN 2019005650 | ISBN 9780262043229 (hardcover : alk. paper)

Subjects: LCSH: Technological innovationsEconomic aspectsUnited States. | InequalityUnited States.

Classification: LCC HC110.T4 G36 2019 | DDC 338/.0640973--dc23

LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2019005650

d_r0

Contents

Foreword

Lawrence H. Summers

The Industrial Revolution is rightly regarded as a major watershed in the history of humanity. After thousands of years when economic change was so slow as not to be noticeable within a single human life span, and where periods of regress were about as likely as periods of progress, all of a sudden enduring progress became the expectation.

Average living standards, which on the most generous of estimates rose by 50 percent from the time of Pericles in Athens to 1800 in London, started rising by 1 percent a year or even a bit more. Everything changed from the role of cities, to the nature of international relations, to relations between the genders, to demands on government, to the organization of business, to the meaning of property.

Taking a long enough view, the Industrial Revolution was a wonderful thing. People today live longer, more comfortably, and more fulfilling lives than they did two centuries ago. From child labor to surgery without anesthesia to slavery practices that were once seen as normal, today are seen in the industrial world as unthinkably barbaric.

But the long enough view speaks little to those whose wages fell when new spinning technologies were introduced and did not find new trades. It neglects the fact that the institutions we take for granted today, like government provided safety nets and universal education did not spring into being automatically, but resulted from a combination of moral necessity, aggressive and intelligent advocacy and political action. And it fails to reckon with the dramatic changes in the global order that took place in the wake of the industrial Revolution that culminated in arguably the two greatest manmade disasters in historythe two world wars.

I raise the Industrial Revolution because the book before us might be thought of as a kind of prehistory of the current and ongoing Knowledge Revolution, an event that I suspect historians in 2400 (if there still are historians in 2400) will see as being every bit as important as the Industrial Revolution. The Knowledge Revolution has likely been under way for several decades now as Information Technology has been transforming almost every aspect of economic life.

In some respects it has accelerated in the last decade. I often make this point to audiences by holding up my iPhone and observing: This $700 device has 1,000 times the computing power that put a man on the moon. It has more computing power than the most powerful computer on earth did when Bill Clinton was elected president. It provides more access to more knowledge than a Harvard University library card even though Harvard has one of the great libraries in the world. And it provides for more connectivity to more people more easily than the White House communications system could provide Lyndon B. Johnson with when he was the most powerful man on Earth. And very soon there will be more iPhones on Earth than there are adults.

The iPhone is about to be turbocharged by the addition of artificial intelligence. Speech recognition and facial recognition are not perfect, but they are on the verge of being better at these tasks than are humans. As I write this, it has just been demonstrated that AI can do a better job diagnosing eye disease from pictures than the best ophthalmologists. Already machines have produced poems, prints, and pieces of music that sophisticates cannot distinguish from those produced by real artists.

As with the Industrial Revolution, there is staggering potential for good in the Knowledge Revolution. But there will surely be large human costs along the way and there will be unexpected side effects that may have dire political consequences. It is the task of scholars and policy makers to maximize the benefits and minimize the adverse impacts.

This requires, as economists like me tend to emphasize, recognizing trade-offs and seeing them clearly. Probably more important, as the best political leaders always intuit and as the authors of this important book highlight, is to identify ways of cutting across trade-offs. This means finding ways of increasing efficiency and equity, of promoting both innovation for the society and security for the individual, of accelerating change while at the same time promoting enduring values.

In uncharted territory of this kind, there are two kinds of peoplethose who do not know they do not know, and those who do know they do not know. It is a great virtue of the present volume that its authors are squarely in the second camp. This leads them to present state of the art thinking on both sides of all the important questions, and to suggest policy approaches that are robust and so will work out well even when their premises turn out to have been off.

I concur with the sentiment often misattributed to Winston Churchill: the United States always does the right thing, but only after exhausting the alternatives. We are moving through many alternatives to the right thing at present. It is a scary time for us and for the world.

But we as a nation will come back just as we did when the Depression caused us to doubt the viability of capitalism, just as we did when Sputnik caused us to believe we would fall behind the Russians, just as we did when President Carter declared a crisis of the national spirit, just as we did when there was near universal agreement that the Cold War was over and Japan has won.

The wisdom in this book about the shape of the world we are entering and about how we can shape that world is profound. The more it is absorbed the sooner will come the day when our adjustment to the Knowledge Revolution will be seen as yet another demonstration of our countrys capacity for self-denying prophecies of doom.

Acknowledgments

Our thanks to Kevin Bryan, James Cham, Danny Gilligan, Nick Green, Richard Holden, Stephen King, Astrid Mastroni, Alex Tabarrok, and three anonymous referees for valuable comments on earlier drafts. At the MIT Press, Emily Taber provided superb editorial feedback.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Innovation + Equality: How to Create a Future That Is More Star Trek Than Terminator»

Look at similar books to Innovation + Equality: How to Create a Future That Is More Star Trek Than Terminator. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Innovation + Equality: How to Create a Future That Is More Star Trek Than Terminator»

Discussion, reviews of the book Innovation + Equality: How to Create a Future That Is More Star Trek Than Terminator and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.