• Complain

Marc Zimmer - Science and the Skeptic: Discerning Fact from Fiction

Here you can read online Marc Zimmer - Science and the Skeptic: Discerning Fact from Fiction full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2022, publisher: Lerner Publishing Group, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Marc Zimmer Science and the Skeptic: Discerning Fact from Fiction
  • Book:
    Science and the Skeptic: Discerning Fact from Fiction
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Lerner Publishing Group
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2022
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Science and the Skeptic: Discerning Fact from Fiction: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Science and the Skeptic: Discerning Fact from Fiction" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Fake news, pseudoscience, and quackery have become scourges, spreading through society from social media all the way to Congress.

The line between entertainment and reality, between fact and fiction, has become blurred. Some of the most crucial issues of our timeclimate change, vaccines, and genetically modified organismshave become prime targets for nefarious disinformation campaigns. Far too many people have become distrustful of real science. Even those who still trust science no longer know what to believe or how to identify the truth. Not only does this result in the devaluation and distrust of real science, but it is also dangerous: people acting based on false information can hurt themselves or those around them.

We must equip ourselves with the knowledge and skills to fight back against all this disinformation. InScience and the Skeptic: Discerning Fact from Fiction, you will learn how science is done, from the basic scientific method to the vetting process that scientific papers must go through to become published; how and why some people intentionally or unintentionally spread misinformation; and the dangers in believing and spreading false information. Youll also find twenty easy-to-follow rules for distinguishing fake science from the real deal. Armed with this book, empower yourself with knowledge, learning what information to trust and what to dismiss as deceit.

Were not just fighting an epidemic; were fighting an infodemic. . . . This is a time for facts, not fear. This is a time for rationality, not rumors. This is a time for solidarity, not stigma.Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the WHO

Our deepest beliefs should help navigate reality, not determine it.Michael Gersen, The Washington Post

Journalism is very much about trying to simplify and distribute information about whats new and where advances have been made. Thats incompatible with the scientific process, which can take a long time to build a body of evidence.Kelly McBride, Poynter Institute

Marc Zimmer: author's other books


Who wrote Science and the Skeptic: Discerning Fact from Fiction? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Science and the Skeptic: Discerning Fact from Fiction — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Science and the Skeptic: Discerning Fact from Fiction" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
To my father Text copyright 2022 by Marc Zimmer All rights reserved - photo 1
To my father Text copyright 2022 by Marc Zimmer All rights reserved - photo 2

To my father

Text copyright 2022 by Marc Zimmer

All rights reserved. International copyright secured. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any meanselectronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwisewithout the prior written permission of Lerner Publishing Group, Inc., except for the inclusion of brief quotations in an acknowledged review .

Twenty-First Century Books

An imprint of Lerner Publishing Group, Inc.

241 First Avenue North

Minneapolis, MN 55401 USA

For reading levels and more information, look up this title at www.lernerbooks.com .

Main body text set in Avenir LT Pro.

Typeface provided by Linotype AG.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Names: Zimmer, Marc, author.

Title: Science and the skepti c : discerning fact from fiction / Marc Zimmer.

Description: Minneapoli s : Twenty-First Century Books, [2022 ] | Includes bibliographical references and index . | Audience: Ages 131 8 | Audience: Grades 101 2 | Summary: Covering how science is done, why some people want to trick others, and why false information can be dangerous, this book empowers readers to know which sources to trust and which to dismiss as deceit Provided by publisher.

Identifiers: LCCN 2021013452 (print ) | LCCN 2021013453 (ebook ) | ISBN 781728419459 (library binding ) | ISBN 781728445434 (ebook)

Subjects: LCSH: ScienceJuvenile literature . | PseudoscienceJuvenile literature . | Fraud in scienceJuvenile literature.

Classification: LCC Q163 .Z55 2022 (print ) | LCC Q163 (ebook ) | DDC 500dc23

LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2021013452

LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2021013453

Manufactured in the United States of America

1-49068-49266-8/30/2021

Contents
Chapter 1 What Is Science To distinguish between science and fake science - photo 3
Chapter 1
What Is Science?

To distinguish between science and fake science, we need to know what science is. Science has many definitions, but most people agree that science is the process of understanding the natural world by interpreting the results of experiments.

Before 1833 people who conducted experimentsthose who mixed, observed, and synthesized chemicalswere called natural philosophers. Famous figures such as Galen (ca. 129210), Galileo Galilei (15641642), and Sir Isaac Newton (16421727) were all natural philosophers. The term science existed, but there was no common term for all the people who did science. In 1833 William Whewell, a professor at Cambridge University, coined the term scientist to highlight that these were empirical folks, people who relied on experiments to build knowledge, rather than philosophers, or people who dealt strictly with ideas.

Generally, scientists follow the scientific method to discover facts about nature. In this procedure, scientists begin with all the knowledge they already have to make an educated guess, or a hypothesis, about a new observation or phenomenon that has yet to be explained. According to the philosopher of science Karl Popper (19021994), for a hypothesis to be truly scientific, there must be an experiment that would disprove it. For example, scientists cannot conduct an experiment that would show whether a sunset is beautiful or not, because there is no way to prove or disprove beauty. Therefore, the study of beauty is not science.

But the study of gravitational waves, ripples in space-time that are produced by massive objects moving at extreme accelerations, such as colliding black holes, is science. When Albert Einstein (18791955) hypothesized the existence of gravitational waves in 1916, he didnt think we would ever be able to detect these waves because they are so minute. In theory (and in practice), gravitational waves regularly pass through us and stretch and squeeze us by amounts so small that we cant feel the changes. Despite this hurdle, their existence was provableall scientists had to do was create the technology needed to measure such tiny changes. In 2015, as a result of the worlds largest and most expensive experiment, scientists measured gravitational waves for the first time. The waves had traveled for 1.3 billion years before passing Earth on their way through space. It took billions of dollars and almost one thousand people to prove that gravitational waves from faraway, massive objects in space hit Earth every few weeks. Since then, scientists have detected them regularly. Because the existence of these strange, barely detectable waves was disprovable, the prediction that they existed was a scientific hypothesis. Once scientists measured and detected them, their existence became scientific fact. If the experiment had not detected gravitational waves, then the existence of the waves would have been disproven and the hypothesis would have been wrong.

After conducting an experiment, scientists interpret the results and decide if they proved the hypothesis. Usually, experimental results come in the form of measurements. To detect gravitational waves, scientists from the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Australia collaborated on the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO). LIGO consists of two 2.5-mile-long (4 km) L-shaped vacuum chambers. One is in Louisiana, and the other is 1,865 miles (3,002 km) away in Washington State. The vacuum chambers are housed in 12-foot-tall (3.6 m) concrete pipes that have to be raised a little less than 3 feet (1 m) at their ends to account for Earths curvature. Gravitational waves that originate billions of light-years from Earth distort the 2.5-mile-long mirror spacing at the ends of the vacuum chambers by about 0.001 times the width of a proton. To ensure these minuscule distortions arent caused by local car crashes, earthquakes, and other disturbances on Earth, the two LIGO detectors were constructed far apart. Therefore, if the scientists observed the same distortion at both LIGO detectors and the distortions occurred ten milliseconds apart (the time it takes to travel 1,865 miles [3,002 km] at the speed of light), then they had detected a gravitational wave.

Pictured above are the results from the September 2015 LIGO detection of - photo 4

Pictured above are the results from the September 2015 LIGO detection of gravitational waves. Both detectors saw an increase in the intensity of the wave signal, corresponding to the merging of two black holes. The signals were observed about seven milliseconds apart, the time it took for the waves to travel the 1,865 miles (3,002 km) between the two LIGO sites.

On Monday, September 14, 2015, at 4:51 a.m. in Louisiana, a gravitational wave arrived from 1.3 billion light-years away, stretching and squeezing space itself, including the lasers, first at the Louisiana site and then seven milliseconds later at the Washington site. Everyone involved with the project in the United States was sleeping. In Germany it was 11:51 a.m., time for lunch. Marco Drago, a young physicist working at the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics in Hannover, Germany, looked at the data coming from LIGO. He immediately recognized the gravitational wave pattern predicted by computer simulations. One of Dragos colleagues contacted the LIGO operations room in Louisiana. Everyone was sworn to secrecy while the LIGO researchers checked and rechecked the data. The signal wasnt a test, and it wasnt noise. It was the real thing, a gravitational wave. By February 2016, five months after the signal was observed, everyone involved was convinced it was real, and the researchers held a press conference to announce that they had detected Einsteins gravitational waves. Meanwhile, they published a paper in Physical Review Letters describing the findings. It had more than one thousand authors.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Science and the Skeptic: Discerning Fact from Fiction»

Look at similar books to Science and the Skeptic: Discerning Fact from Fiction. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Science and the Skeptic: Discerning Fact from Fiction»

Discussion, reviews of the book Science and the Skeptic: Discerning Fact from Fiction and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.