First published 1996 by Garland Publishing, Inc.
This edition first published in 2021 by Routledge
605 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017
and by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
Copyright 1996 David A, Williamson
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Notice:
Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Publishers Note
The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this reprint but points out that some imperfections in the original copies may be apparent.
Disclaimer
The publisher has made evety effort to trace copyright holders and welcomes correspondence from those they have been unable to contact.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Williamson, David A., 1958
Job satisfaction in social services / David A. Williamson.
p. cm. (Garland studies in the history of American labor)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0-8153-2380-8 (alk. paper)
1. Social workersUnited States. 2. Job satisfactionUnited States. 3. Social serviceUnited States. I. Title. II. Series.
HV40.8.U6W55 1996
361.32dc20 96-26627
ISBN 13: 978-1-03-216575-2 (hbk)
ISBN 13: 978-1-03-216722-0 (pbk)
ISBN 13: 978-1-00-324956-6 (ebk)
DOI: 10.4324/9781003249566
For Daniel B. Cornfield: Mentor and Friend
Contents
- List of Illustrations
- List of Tables
- Preface
- Chapter 1. Work in the Context of Social Services
- Chapter 2. Data From a State DHS
- Chapter 3. Variation Across Four Job Groups
- Chapter 4. Testing Models of Satisfaction
- Chapter 5. Toward a New Model of Job Satisfaction
- Appendices
- Appendix A: The DHS Questionnaire
- Appendix B: Zero Order Correlations
- References
- Index
Illustrations
Figures
- 1. A preliminary model of job satisfaction
- 2. A preliminary model of commitment
- 3. Graphed cell means of SATIS showing EXPRESS/job commitment interaction
- 1a. A revised model of job satisfaction
- 2a. A revised model of job commitment
- 4. Composite model of global satisfaction and commitment
Tables
- Distribution of variables from DHS personnel data
- Size, percentage distribution, and response rates of the four DHS occupations
- Logistic regression of the odds of returning a questionnaire
- Grouped responses to global satisfaction
- Variables measuring satisfaction
- Grouped responses to commitment questions
- Value-of-work variables
- Variables used to measure control
- ANOVA: Changes in attitudes by job group
- Mean scores of individual characteristics by job group
- Mean scores of satisfaction across four job groups
- Mean scores of commitment across four job groups
- Mean scores of work values across four job groups
- Mean scores of control across four job groups
- Mean scores of legitimacy perceptions across four job groups
- OLS Regression of SATIS on background variables
- OLS Regression of COMMIT on background variables
- OLS Regression of job commitment on background variables
- OLS Regression of professional commitment on background variables
- OLS Regression of SATIS on pay satisfaction and information sharing
- OLS Regression of SATIS on supervision and co-workers
- OLS Regression of SAYSO on agency and client control
- OLS Regression of LOCUS on agency and client control
- Model 1 test: OLS Regression of SATIS
- OLS Regression of authority legitimacy1 on agency control
- OLS Regression of authority legitimacy2 on agency control
- OLS Regression of job commitment on agency, client, and perceived control
- OLS Regression of job commitment on agency, client, and perceived control
- OLS Regression of job commitment on control, perceived authority legitimacy, and professional commitment
- OLS Regression of SATIS on collected variables
- OLS Regression of SATIS on EXPRESS/commitment interaction terms
- SATIS mean scores for EXPRESS by job commitment cross tabulation
- OLS Regression of SATIS comparing low and high expressive orientation
Preface
Before coming to sociology as a discipline and a profession I pondered the questions that this book addresses as I worked in a number of human service organizations. Their missions ranged from caring for emotionally abused children near Los Angeles to delivering emergency food relief during the Ethiopian famine of the mid-1980s. Of course, the questions were at that time only unarticulated curiosities.
Personal experience and my untrained observation of others from dozens of nationalities and ethnic groups who also were engaged in human service work led me to a number of assumptions: 1) those who are engaged in people-helping fuld the greatest rewards in the intangibles that go along with making a difference in someones life; 2) their frustration with bureaucratic interference, whether from the seemingly inane and arbitrary laws of despotic Third World leaders or state child protection laws, is frequently high and often aggravated because of the extraordinary value they place on the lives of those they are seeking to help; and 3) although they work hard in exchange for relatively low monetary rewards, the thought of doing anything other than people-helping leaves them uninspired, regardless of the prospect of substantially increased pay and benefits.
Their work often is a vocation, a mission, and a ministry. There are many exceptions and not all social service workers are saints (although Ive met a few who should qualify). In fact, their uniqueness seems to have less to do with saintliness than it does with a qualitative difference in what they view as meaningful workor that they need to find meaning in work at all.
It was from these observations, latent though they may have been, that I drew my fust questions as I became more familiar with the research into job satisfaction and commitment. Intuitively, existing models just did not seem adequate to explain the experience of work for those I had known in human service occupations. Moving beyond intuition, the research represented here is a fledgling step toward expanding our limited understanding of the dynamics of how work affects workers.
Those who are aware of the existing research into job satisfaction in social services may think that I am coming late to the game. This books main point, however, is not that job satisfaction research has been ignored in this area, but that those in the mainstream of job satisfaction research in sociology have been engaged for years in the construction of models of satisfaction built almost entirely on data from business and industry. More specifically, although values of work and rewards have been analyzed in a number of ways as predictors of job satisfaction, the argument presented here is that there are fundamental differences in the way we approach work (or are oriented toward work) that define for each of us its essence, meaning, and experience. Those fundamental differences suggest the need to modify predictive models of job satisfaction that reflect the unique processes and mechanisms that contribute to positive job affect for people with a variety of orientations toward work.