• Complain

Hermann Giliomee - The Last Afrikaner Leaders: A Supreme Test of Power

Here you can read online Hermann Giliomee - The Last Afrikaner Leaders: A Supreme Test of Power full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Charlottesville, year: 2013, publisher: University of Virginia Press, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    The Last Afrikaner Leaders: A Supreme Test of Power
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    University of Virginia Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2013
  • City:
    Charlottesville
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The Last Afrikaner Leaders: A Supreme Test of Power: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Last Afrikaner Leaders: A Supreme Test of Power" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Finalist for the Alan Paton Award

In his latest book, renowned historian Hermann Giliomee challenges the conventional wisdom on the downfall of white rule and the end of apartheid. Instead of impersonal forces, or the resourcefulness of an indomitable resistance movement, he emphasizes the role of Nationalist leaders and of their outspoken critic Frederick van Zyl Slabbert. What motivated each of the last Afrikaner leaders, from Verwoerd to de Klerk? How did each try to reconcile economic growth, white privilege, and security with the demands of an increasingly assertive black leadership and unexpected population figures?


In exploring each leaders background, reasoning, and personal foibles, Giliomee takes issue with the assumption that South Africa was inexorably heading for an ANC victory in 1994. He argues that historical accidents radically affected the course of politics.


Drawing on primary sources and personal interviews, Giliomee offers a fresh and stimulating political history that attempts not to condemn but to understand why the last Afrikaner leaders did what they did, and why their own policies ultimately failed them.

A 2014 CHOICE Outstanding Academic Title

Reconsiderations in Southern African History

Hermann Giliomee: author's other books


Who wrote The Last Afrikaner Leaders: A Supreme Test of Power? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Last Afrikaner Leaders: A Supreme Test of Power — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Last Afrikaner Leaders: A Supreme Test of Power" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
The Last Afrikaner LeadersReconsiderations in Southern African History Richard - photo 1
The Last Afrikaner
LeadersReconsiderations in Southern African History
Richard Elphick, Editor
HERMANN GILIOMEE
The Last Afrikaner
Leaders
A Supreme Test of Power
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA PRESS
CHARLOTTESVILLE AND LONDON
To Annette
Published jointly by
Tafelberg
An imprint of NB Publishers
40 Heerengracht, Cape Town, 8000
South Africa
www.tafelberg.com
University of Virginia Press
P.O. Box 400318, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4318
USA
www.upress.virginia.edu
2012 Hermann Giliomee
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including photocopying and recording, or by any other information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publisher.
Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper
First University of Virginia Press edition published 2013
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Giliomee, Hermann, 1938
The last Afrikaner leaders : a supreme test of power / Hermann Giliomee. First University of Virginia Press edition.
pages cm. (Reconsiderations in southern African history)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-8139-3494-5 (pbk. : alk. paper)ISBN 978-0-8139-3495-2 (e-book)
1. National Party (South Africa)History20th century. 2. PoliticiansSouth Africa20th century. 3. ApartheidSouth Africa20th century. 4. Power (Social sciences)South Africa. 5. South AfricaPolitics and government19481994. 6. South AfricaRace relations20th centuryPolitical aspectsHistory. I. Title. II. Series: Reconsiderations in southern African history.
JQ1998.N2G55 2013
320.968dc23
2013015101
Set in Minion / Book design Nazli Jacobs / Index Sanet le Roux
Excerpt from a poem Robert Burns wrote in 1785
as an apology after accidentally overturning a
mousess house in a cornfield:
But, Mousie, thou art not thy lane [you are not alone],
In proving foresight may be vain;
The best-laid schemes o mice an men
Gang aft agley [often go awry],
An leae us nought but grief an pain,
For promised joy!
Contents
Introduction
A Tragic Dilemma
IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY, SOUTH AFRICA WENT through two revolutions. The first was the implementation of the apartheid policy, accompanied by massive social engineering, which more comprehensively segregated races than any other racial policy in the world. The second was the unprecedented handing over of power by whites to blacks, although the state, based predominantly on the white minority, was neither defeated nor bankrupt. This book is about five white leaders Hendrik Verwoerd, John Vorster, PW Botha, FW de Klerk and Frederik van Zyl Slabbert and their roles in one or other of these revolutions.
Writing well before apartheid was fully introduced, Alan Paton published two novels, Cry, the Beloved Country (1948) and Too Late the Phalarope (1953), about the unfolding political drama of what he called the tragic dilemma of the white man. A man is caught on the face of a cliff, Paton writes. As he sees it, he cannot go up and he cannot go down; if he stays where he is, he will die. All those who stand watching have pity for him. But the analogy, alas, is obviously incomplete, for the worlds spectators of our drama are seldom pitiful; they are more often reproachful. From their point of vantage they can see which way we ought to go, but they see us taking some other way which will lead us to our destruction. And the world looks at us in astonishment, wondering what madness has possessed us.
In the mid-1960s British journalist Douglas Brown remarked that apartheid had no counterpart in history and that no race has ever been so universally condemned for preserving its identity than South African whites.
There was a reason why Brown and Drury were so certain there would be no surrender of power. The people in power were Afrikaner nationalists who, more than the English-speaking community, were rooted in the land. They controlled a state
To most informed commentators writing in the 1960s and 1970s it was inconceivable that Afrikaners, with such a large stake in the state, would give up power voluntarily. From the early 1960s Afrikaners had begun to dominate the senior levels of the civil service, security service and public corporations. They would be the first targets of a new government committed to racial transformation.
Also likely to be affected was Afrikaans, enjoying equal status with English as an official language as part of an English-Afrikaner pact in the drafting of the Union Constitution of 1909. Afrikaans along with Hindi, Malay-Indonesian and Hebrew became one of only four languages in the world that were standardised in the course of the twentieth century and came to be used in all branches of life and learning, including postgraduate studies and science and technology. In 1990 a commentator considered Afrikaans the strongest language in South Africa as it was used countrywide, both formally and informally. Given the haste with which newly independent African states elevated the colonial language to the status of the only national language, it could be expected that a new government in South Africa would waste little time in doing the same.
There were also fears that the overthrow of the government could be accompanied by attempts at retribution. In early 1973 the United Nations General Assembly declared apartheid a crime against humanity and agreed to the drawing up of an International Convention on the Suppression of the Crime of Apartheid. An obvious attempt on the part of the Soviet Union to embarrass the West, the Convention was ratified first by twenty countries in the Soviet bloc that had no record of protecting human rights themselves. Although leading Western nations openly refused to endorse the resolution or ratify the Convention, the African National Congress (ANC), through skilful propaganda, manufactured the impression that the entire world considered apartheid a crime against humanity.
The four National Party (NP) leaders featured in this book all believed the power they held conferred on them the huge responsibility not to put at risk Afrikaner political power and the prospects for Afrikaner survival, which they closely linked. From the early 1960s they increasingly blamed agitators, communists or black nationalists for any resistance to apartheid. The fifth leader discussed here, Van Zyl Slabbert, never held political power, but would in my opinion have reached the highest political position in the land if, during the mid-1960s, he had chosen the career path that the Afrikaner nationalist establishment aware of his remarkable abilities had marked out for him.
Slabbert was fully aware of white fears, both rational and irrational, but argued that apartheid, not communism, was the real cause of the conflict. He became the most formidable critic of the policy, using a unique combination of intellectual, economic and moral arguments. Like some of his academic contemporaries, Slabbert was gripped by the ideas of NP van Wyk Louw, the pre-eminent Afrikaner poet and essayist, who had argued in a book published in 1958 that the challenge for the Afrikaners was not merely to survive, but to survive in justice.
In the first half of the 1990s the second revolution occurred. Afrikaners did what few expected: they accepted majority rule without having suffered a defeat at the hands of the subjugated population. The army and the police remained intact and loyal to the NP government. There is no other example in recorded history of such a surrender of power without defeat. It is true that sanctions, black opposition and white demographic decline (whites as a proportion of the total population sank from 19% in 1951 to below 10% by 2005) put strong pressure on white minority rule. Yet a government determined and bloody-minded enough could, through skilful cooptation of both black and business leaders, have held on for quite some time. This was one thing on which FW de Klerk and Van Zyl Slabbert agreed.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Last Afrikaner Leaders: A Supreme Test of Power»

Look at similar books to The Last Afrikaner Leaders: A Supreme Test of Power. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Last Afrikaner Leaders: A Supreme Test of Power»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Last Afrikaner Leaders: A Supreme Test of Power and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.