• Complain

Alison Lefkovitz - Strange Bedfellows: Marriage in the Age of Womens Liberation

Here you can read online Alison Lefkovitz - Strange Bedfellows: Marriage in the Age of Womens Liberation full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2018, publisher: University of Pennsylvania Press, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Strange Bedfellows: Marriage in the Age of Womens Liberation
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    University of Pennsylvania Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2018
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Strange Bedfellows: Marriage in the Age of Womens Liberation: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Strange Bedfellows: Marriage in the Age of Womens Liberation" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

In the inaugural issue of Ms. Magazine, the feminist activist Judy Syfers proclaimed that she would like a wife, offering a wry critique of the state of marriage in modern America. After all, she observed, a wife could provide Syfers with free childcare and housecleaning services as well as wages from a job. Outside the pages of Ms., divorced mens rights activist Charles Metz opened his own manifesto on marriage reform with a triumphant recognition that noise is swelling from hundreds of thousands of divorced male victims. In the 1960s and 70s, a broad array of Americans identified marriage as a problem, and according to Alison Lefkovitz, the subsequent changes to marriage law at the state and federal levels constituted a social and legal revolution.
The law had long imposed breadwinner and homemaker roles on husbands and wives respectively. In the 1960s, state legislatures heeded the calls of divorced men and feminist activists, but their reforms, such as no-fault divorce, generally benefitted husbands more than wives. Meanwhile, radical feminists, welfare rights activists, gay liberationists, and immigrant spouses fought for a much broader agenda, such as the extension of gender-neutral financial obligations to all families or the separation of benefits from family relationships entirely. But a host of conservatives stymied this broader revolution. Therefore, even the modest victories that feminists won eluded less prosperous Americansmarriage rights were available to those who could afford them.
Examining the effects of law and politics on the intimate space of the home, Strange Bedfellows recounts how the marriage revolution at once instituted formal legal equality while also creating new forms of political and economic inequality that historianslike most Americanshave yet to fully understand.

Alison Lefkovitz: author's other books


Who wrote Strange Bedfellows: Marriage in the Age of Womens Liberation? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Strange Bedfellows: Marriage in the Age of Womens Liberation — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Strange Bedfellows: Marriage in the Age of Womens Liberation" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Strange BedfellowsPOLITICS AND CULTURE IN MODERN AMERICA Series Editors Margot - photo 1
Strange Bedfellows
POLITICS AND CULTURE IN MODERN AMERICA
Series Editors: Margot Canaday, Glenda Gilmore, Michael Kazin, Stephen Pitti, Thomas J. Sugrue
Volumes in the series narrate and analyze political and social change in the broadest dimensions from 1865 to the present, including ideas about the ways people have sought and wielded power in the public sphere and the language and institutions of politics at all levelslocal, national, and transnational. The series is motivated by a desire to reverse the fragmentation of modern U.S. history and to encourage synthetic perspectives on social movements and the state, on gender, race, and labor, and on intellectual history and popular culture.
STRANGE BEDFELLOWS
Marriage in the Age of Womens Liberation
Alison Lefkovitz
Copyright 2018 University of Pennsylvania Press All rights reserved Except for - photo 2
Copyright 2018 University of Pennsylvania Press
All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations used for purposes of review or scholarly citation, none of this book may be reproduced in any form by any means without written permission from the publisher.
Published by
University of Pennsylvania Press
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4112
www.upenn.edu/pennpress
Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Lefkovitz, Alison, author.
Title: Strange bedfellows: marriage in the age of womens liberation / Alison Lefkovitz.
Other titles: Politics and culture in modern America.
Description: 1st edition. | Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, [2018] | Series: Politics and culture in modern America | Includes bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2017046028 | ISBN 9780812250152 (hardcover: alk. paper)
Subjects: LCSH: MarriageUnited StatesHistory20th century. | MarriageUnited StatesHistory20th centuryPublic opinion. | Domestic relationsUnited StatesHistory20th century. | Marriage lawUnited StatesHistory20th century. | Womens rightsUnited StatesHistory20th century. | Sex roleUnited StatesHistory20th century. | Public opinionUnited States.
Classification: LCC HQ535 .L36 2018 | DDC 306.810973dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017046028
CONTENTS
In the inaugural issue of Ms. Magazine, the feminist activist Judy Syfers proclaimed that she would like a wife. A few pages away in this same issue, Johnnie Tillmon, the president of the National Welfare Rights Organization, critiqued not only the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program but also marriage. She proclaimed that all women were domestic slaves, and even marriage provided wan protection or pay for this labor.
Outside of the pages of Ms., other Americans debated marriage. Divorced mens rights activist Charles Metz, for example, opened his own book-long manifesto on marriage reform in 1968 with a triumphant recognition that noise is swelling from hundreds of thousands of divorced male victims. God help us to swell this noise, still a whimper, into a roar of indignation that will be felt in every court and legislative body in this Union of States and their Federal Government. Phyllis Schlafly, similarly, decried the Equal Rights Amendment for its potential danger to the institution of marriage broadly and to wives in particular. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) identified sham unions as one of the main threats to the nations borders. Gay men and lesbians, meanwhile, dressed in drag to try to win marriage licenses from oblivious bureaucrats and then went to local newspapers to call attention to their exclusion from marriage.
In other words, a broad array of Americans identified marriage as a problem in the 1960s and 1970s, and the subsequent changes to marriage law at the local and federal levels constituted a legal revolution. But legislators and courts instituted these changes unevenly to ameliorate the problems they identified as the most dangerous, rather than give activists exactly what they had asked for. These new policies replaced the more blatant gender and racial inequalities that courts and legislatures had stripped out of the law during the civil rights revolution. Like law and order campaigns and the War on Drugs, the legal revolution in marriage at once instituted formal legal equality and also created new forms of political inequality that historianslike most Americanshave yet to fully understand.
The difficulty began with the legal foundations of marriage. Half a century after the long struggle for votes for women had secured an amendment to the nations founding document, wives and husbands were still sharply distinguished not only in popular culture and private life but also in law. State laws nationwide obliged wives to perform nearly all of the homemaking tasks that Syfers catalogued in Ms.; wives unpaid labor in the home still belonged to their husbands in practice and in law.
Yet husbands had their own gendered obligations to fulfill, characterized above all by the duty to support their wives and children. Though a wife had to bring her case to court, the government enforced a husbands financial duties as spouses entered and left a marriage.
Beginning in the 1960s, a feminist revival worked to dismantle this system. Different feminists advocated for different ideas ranging from the total destruction of the institution to more cosmetic changes. Liberal feminists had the greatest success at reforming the law, but even among them, two different concepts of equality rivaled one another. One was what I call expansionistit sought to keep the protections that wives enjoyed by extending them to husbands as well. Wives could take care of their husbands just as husbands had traditionally taken care of wives. The other concept of equality was individualistit sought to make wives roles equal to husbands financially and in law by compensating women for their household labor at the point of divorce, retirement, or widowhood. Neither spouse would have to take care of the other over time. Both visions of equality had some significant though mitigated effects on marriage law, which changed but without fully accounting for the vast gender difference that persisted within the home and in terms of jobs, income, and wealth.
Feminists redefining of the marriage relationship led husbands to question their roles as well. Many husbands increasingly resented their support obligations as wives began rethinking their roles as homemakers. Most husbands were not well organized, but many nonetheless backed away from breadwinning obligations en masse in the 1970s. Other husbands, like Charles Metz, founded divorced mens groups that sued or lobbied to free men of these obligations. And though these groups were not the most effectively organized of activist bodies, their claims seemed to resonate with state legislatures and courts who limited mens support obligations.
Feminists and divorced husband groups questioning of the marriage relationship also coincided with welfare, immigration, and gay marriage activists rising demands that lawmakers treat their families equitably. While their specific goals and who they counted as a family varied, all three of these emerging social movements asked the government to provide the same legal recognition and financial support that traditional families received. This diverse array of advocates on the left also made use of the changing legal ground, new resources, and new strategies forged by the civil rights and feminist movements to make demands such as extending gender-neutral obligations to all families or decoupling benefits from family relationships entirely. The resources and strategies had their limits, however. While the feminist movement won a moderated victory in the form of greater legal equality between husbands and wives, these activists gained even less.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Strange Bedfellows: Marriage in the Age of Womens Liberation»

Look at similar books to Strange Bedfellows: Marriage in the Age of Womens Liberation. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Strange Bedfellows: Marriage in the Age of Womens Liberation»

Discussion, reviews of the book Strange Bedfellows: Marriage in the Age of Womens Liberation and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.