• Complain

William Shawcross - Justice and the Enemy: Nuremberg, 9/11, and the Trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed

Here you can read online William Shawcross - Justice and the Enemy: Nuremberg, 9/11, and the Trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2012, publisher: PublicAffairs, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Justice and the Enemy: Nuremberg, 9/11, and the Trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    PublicAffairs
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2012
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Justice and the Enemy: Nuremberg, 9/11, and the Trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Justice and the Enemy: Nuremberg, 9/11, and the Trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Since the Nuremberg Trials of 1945, lawful nations have struggled to impose justice around the world, especially when confronted by tyrannical and genocidal regimes. But in Cambodia, the USSR, China, Bosnia, Rwanda, and beyond, justice has been served haltingly if at all in the face of colossal inhumanity. International Courts are not recognized worldwide. There is not a global consensus on how to punish transgressors.
The war against Al Qaeda is a war like no other. Osama bin Laden, Al Qaedas founder, was killed in Pakistan by Navy Seals. Few people in America felt anything other than that justice had been served. But what about the man who conceived and executed the 9/11 attacks on the US, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed? What kind of justice does he deserve? The U.S. has tried to find the high ground by offering KSM a trial albeit in the form of military tribunal. But is this hypocritical? Indecisive? Half-hearted? Or merely the best application of justice possible for a man who is implacably opposed to the civilization that the justice system supports and is derived from? In this book, William Shawcross explores the visceral debate that these questions have provoked over the proper application of democratic values in a time of war, and the enduring dilemma posed to all victors in war: how to treat the worst of your enemies.

William Shawcross: author's other books


Who wrote Justice and the Enemy: Nuremberg, 9/11, and the Trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Justice and the Enemy: Nuremberg, 9/11, and the Trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Justice and the Enemy: Nuremberg, 9/11, and the Trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Table of Contents ALSO BY WILLIAM SHAWCROSS Dubcek Dubcek and - photo 1
Table of Contents ALSO BY WILLIAM SHAWCROSS Dubcek Dubcek and - photo 2
Table of Contents

ALSO BY WILLIAM SHAWCROSS
Dubcek: Dubcek and Czechoslovakia 19181968

Crime and Compromise: Janos Kadar and the Politics of Hungary since Revolution

Sideshow: Kissinger, Nixon, and the Destruction of Cambodia

The Quality of Mercy: Cambodia, Holocaust, and Modern Conscience

The Shahs Last Ride: The Fate of an Ally

Murdoch: The Making of a Media Empire

Deliver Us from Evil: Warlords, Peacekeepers, and a World of Endless Conflict

Queen and Country

Allies: Why the West Had to Remove Saddam

Queen Elizabeth, The Queen Mother: The Official Biography
For Anthony Smith, constant friend
Salus populi suprema lex.
The safety of the people shall be the highest law.
Cicero, De Legibus, Book iii, sec. 3,
derived by tradition from the
Twelve Tables of Roman law

Laws are formed by the manners and exigencies of particular times, and it is but accidental that they last longer than their causes.
Samuel Johnson, Letter to James
Boswell, February 3, 1776
INTRODUCTION
THE JUDGMENT OF EVIL IS NEVER SIMPLE. When considering the case of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the so-called mastermind of the 9/11 attacks on America and of many other murders around the world, I recalled the work of the philosopher George Steiner, who has written at length on the consequences of Nazi crimes. In 1981, Steiner caused a sensation by creating a novellaThe Portage to San Cristobal of AHin which a group of Jewish Nazi hunters discover Hitler, deep in the Amazon jungle, three decades after the end of the Second World War. Many prominent Nazis had indeed fled to South America after their defeat in May 1945; the most important to be discovered was Adolf Eichmann, whom the Israelis kidnapped and spirited to Israel in 1960.
In Jerusalem, Eichmann was put on trial, found guilty, and hanged. Hannah Arendt, writing of that trial, famously spoke of the banality of evil. By this controversial phrase she did not mean that the evil acts of mass murder of Jews for which Eichmann was responsible were commonplace. Rather she felt that it was not the presence of hatred in Eichmann that drove him to send so many people to their deaths, but the absence of imagination. It was the juxtaposition of evil deeds and the failure to make judgments that Arendt called banal. Eichmann himself maintained after his arrest that he was merely following orders and that he had abdicated his conscience in order to follow the Fuhrerprinzip.
But that was not true. In 2011, the German news magazine, Der Spiegel published an investigation of Eichmann based on what it said were formerly confidential, secret and top-secret documents. These included taped conversations Eichmann had with friends in Buenos Aires before the Israelis caught him. On one occasion he boasted of his crimes, I was no ordinary recipient of orders. If I had been one, I would have been a fool. Instead, I was part of the thought process. I was an idealist. His only regret was in not having murdered all the Jews. We didnt do our work correctly, he said. There was more that could have been done.
In the case of the Fuhrer himself, Steiner began to wonder: what if Hitler, as well as Eichmann, had actually escaped his Berlin bunker, had gotten himself to Latin America, and had lived there, hidden, ever since? If, like Eichmann, he was finally discovered, how should he be dealt withhow should he be tried for his crimes?
Steiner, himself a refugee from Nazi Europe, had always been preoccupied by the power of language. He was haunted by an early 1920s photograph of Hitler standing like a beggar, with a torn raincoat in front of him, and no one is listening to him. But then ten people listened, and then a million.... Hitlers eloquence had been overwhelming and within ten years it had propelled him to be master of Germany and then of Europe and, had he, for example, decided to woo his Jewish atomic scientists, he might well have been master of everything.
Steiner began to write The Portage in 1975, at a time when stories of the horrors perpetrated by the Khmer Rouge were being reported by refugees from Cambodia. He asserted that the book sprang out of my thinking about the horror and terror of the Holocaust. I insist on this, because this novel is also about Cambodia and Vietnam, El Salvador and Burundi and so on. My feeling is that one has to grapple with the abyss if one can.
In the novella, the Jewish team discovers Hitler and starts to carry him out of the jungle to civilization. But rumors that the Fuhrer has been found flash around the world, as fast as was already possible in those innocent pre-Internet days. The powers who won the warthe United States, the Soviet Union, Britain, and Franceall begin to ponder the implications of Hitlers return. Fierce arguments begin over where and how he should be put on trialand under what jurisdiction. Deep in the jungle, Hitlers Israeli captors have similar debates. What should be done with him? Burn him at the stake? Set him free as a beggar in Israel itself?
In violent rainstor ms, the search partys radio breaks down. They have to decide whether to sit out the weather and then deliver Hitler as planned to San Cristobal, or whether the risk of their captive being stolen from them, either by some nation or some media emperor, is too great. They understand that once the world knows that Hitler is being brought out of the jungle, airfields will be dug, roads bulldozed through the trees. And a million television cameras. And a Hilton.... theyd come like locusts. And take him from us. Thats the whole point. Theyd take him to New York or Moscow or Nuremberg. And wed be lucky if they allowed us to stand in the anteroom peering over a million heads.
Instead, they decide to conduct their own trial, complete with judge, prosecution, and defense attorneys selected from their own party.
Remarkably, Steiner gives Hitler almost the last word: the climax of the book is Hitlers self-defense. It was from the Jews, he declares, that he learned everything. To set a race apart. To keep it from defilement. To hold before it a promised land.... My racism is a parody of yours, a hungry imitation. What is a thousand-year Reich compared with the eternity of Zion?
Steiners Hitler insists that he was not the originator of evil in our timeStalin, he points out, had perfected genocide when I was still a nameless scribbler in Munich. Stalin killed thirty million peoplefar more than he, Hitler. Our terrors were a village carnival compared with his. Our camps covered absurd acres; he had strung wire and death pits around a continent.... How many Jews did Stalin kill, your saviour, your ally Stalin? Answer me that... Stalin died in bed and the world stood hushed before the tigers rest. Whereas you hunt me down like a rabid dog, put me on trial (by what right, by what mandate?).
Finally, Hitler claims that he, the persecutor of the Jews, was also their benefactor; the Holocaust was the principal reason they were able to create Israel. Perhaps I am the Messiah... whose infamous deeds were allowed by God in order to bring His people home.
As his speech ends, Teku, the partys Indian tracker, leaps to his feet and shouts, with startling vagueness, Proved. As he does so, raucous drumbeats break the air above the clearing where the trial is taking place. The first helicopter from the ravenous world has arrived.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Justice and the Enemy: Nuremberg, 9/11, and the Trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed»

Look at similar books to Justice and the Enemy: Nuremberg, 9/11, and the Trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Justice and the Enemy: Nuremberg, 9/11, and the Trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed»

Discussion, reviews of the book Justice and the Enemy: Nuremberg, 9/11, and the Trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.