• Complain

Stefan Collini - What are Universities For?

Here you can read online Stefan Collini - What are Universities For? full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2012, publisher: Penguin Books Ltd, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Stefan Collini What are Universities For?
  • Book:
    What are Universities For?
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Penguin Books Ltd
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2012
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

What are Universities For?: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "What are Universities For?" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Across the world, universities are more numerous than they have ever been, yet at the same time there is unprecedented confusion about their purpose and skepticism about their value. What Are Universities For? offers a spirited and compelling argument for completely rethinking the way we see our universities, and why we need them. Stefan Collini challenges the common claim that universities need to show that they help to make money in order to justify getting more money. Instead, he argues that we must reflect on the different types of institution and the distinctive roles they play. In particular we must recognize that attempting to extend human understanding, which is at the heart of disciplined intellectual enquiry, can never be wholly harnessed to immediate social purposes - particularly in the case of the humanities, which both attract and puzzle many people and are therefore the most difficult subjects to justify. At a time when the future of higher education lies in the balance, What Are Universities For? offers all of us a better, deeper and more enlightened understanding of why universities matter, to everyone.

Stefan Collini: author's other books


Who wrote What are Universities For?? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

What are Universities For? — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "What are Universities For?" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

STEFAN COLLINI What Are Universities For PENGUIN BOOKS Contents PENGUIN - photo 1

STEFAN COLLINI
What Are Universities For?

Picture 2
PENGUIN BOOKS

Contents

PENGUIN BOOKS

WHAT ARE UNIVERSITIES FOR?

Stefan Collini has become one of the most respected voices in public debates about universities and their place in modern society. He is Professor of Intellectual History and English Literature at Cambridge University and Fellow of the British Academy; he is also a frequent contributor to the Guardian, the London Review of Books, The Times Literary Supplement and the Nation. Reviewers of his recent Common Reading: Critics, Historians, Publics (2008) described him as one of Britains finest essaysists and writers. Other works include Absent Minds: Intellectuals in Britain (2006), English Pasts: Essays in History and Culture (1999), Matthew Arnold: A Critical Portrait (1994) and Public Moralists (1991).

To my colleagues and students,
who have taught me what universities are for

Introduction

Asking what something is for all too often turns out to be asking for trouble. There is, to begin with, the danger of seeming to reduce a complex activity or institution to a single, narrow purpose: it is doubtful whether an answer that is both short and illuminating could be given to questions about what, say, love is for or a country is for we immediately sense that any answer is bound to be a tiresome mixture of banality and tendentiousness. And then there is the problem that any answer may seem to invite the same question Yes, but what is that for? spiralling down into an endless regress. As the ball of reasoning starts to roll down the slope of justification, we realize that our likely destination is a muddy pond of abstract nouns in which all distinctiveness gets lost. But any intermediate stopping-point is bound to seem arbitrary and, for that reason, vulnerable to somebody giving the ball another nudge. This situation recalls that old cartoon which depicted a truculent and precocious small child, head in hands on the kitchen table, saying to an exasperated parent standing nearby: I was merely observing that Because is why seemed to me to contain a hidden premise. History does not record whether the child went on to become a distinguished philosopher (or, indeed, survived into adulthood at all).

But, sometimes, asking what something is for can, if understood as an expository tactic, a starting-point rather than a ruling, be a means of helping us to clear away the discursive debris that accumulates round any widely used category. The very asking of the question in this slightly over-insistent, finger-jabbing form may be enough to encourage reflection to cut through the incidental clutter and begin to wonder what kind of response could count as a useful answer. From then on, it is probably sensible not to try to press the question further in this narrow form, but to let rumination extend itself, brooding on the diversity that may shelter under a single term, pondering a series of characterizations or historical instances rather than seeking a single defining proposition. That, certainly, will be the tactic of this book. But the initial question will already have done its work if it helps to launch such a train of reflection, thereby giving us some distance from the numbingly familiar repetition of a few stock phrases in news stories and comment columns. John Maynard Keynes famously asked What is economics for?, using that question to remind his readers that the pursuit of wealth was not an end in itself but a means to . Keyness example is pertinent, and inspiring, because any discussion of the place of universities in contemporary society will inevitably be driven to articulate, in however rudimentary terms, some sense of human purposes beyond that of accumulating wealth.

Or so one might think. Yet it is scarcely an exaggeration to say that the greater part of public discourse about universities at present reduces to the following dispiriting proposition: universities need to justify getting more money and the way to do this is by showing that they help to make more money. This book is an attempt to start from somewhere else and to talk about universities in a different way.

Since there is an obvious risk that my arguments in this vein will be misinterpreted and misrepresented in some quarters (I still bear some bruises from earlier attempts to make this case), let me say emphatically here that I and, I believe, pretty much everyone else who works in or cares about universities do not for a moment underestimate the expense of these institutions or presume that there is some God-given right for them to be lavishly funded. Of course the case for their value and importance needs to be made. But it needs to be made in appropriate terms, and these terms are not chiefly, and certainly not exclusively, economic. They are intellectual, educational, scientific, and cultural. In addition, it has to be emphasized that higher education is a public good, not simply a set of private benefits for those who happen to participate in it, and therefore that it is a mistake to allow the case for universities to be represented as a merely sectional or self-interested cause on the part of current students and academics.

This book argues that we shall not identify the distinctive character of universities if we concentrate on the ramifications of one or another local, and necessarily temporary, model of funding them. Similarly, we shall not come very close to understanding the true character and interest of intellectual enquiry if we start from the presuppositions of those who believe that such enquiry is a luxury whose economic benefit remains to be demonstrated. And nor will we arrive at an adequate grasp of what is, or should be, involved in a university education, as opposed to various other forms of instruction and training, if we start from the current preoccupation with access. Funding, impact, access: these three starting-points taken either singly or, more often, as a trinity signalling the realism and up-to-dateness of ones position now utterly dominate the political and media discussion of universities in Britain. But these are secondary matters, and the last two, in particular, are merely transient formulae clumsy articulations of aspects of social attitudes to which politicians find it expedient to appeal. When I take issue with these fashions, as I do in , my focus is on the assumptions underlying them, not (except incidentally) on recommending some alternative set of arrangements.

In to bear on current debates in a pointed and topical way. These chapters also bear witness, in a necessarily episodic form, to the sharply accelerating way in which successive governments, of whichever party, have attempted to impose an increasingly economistic agenda on universities over the past two decades.

Since what I have to say about universities is partly a reflection on practice, I should indicate at the outset the kind of practice of which I have most direct experience. In the broadest terms, my own writing and teaching have been in the overlapping fields of literature and history. More particularly, my work has been concerned with aspects of the literary and intellectual culture of (largely) Britain in the nineteenth and twentieth (and now twenty-first) centuries, including the history of its universities. What I have to say would no doubt be different if my own background were in, say, philosophy or music or classics or art history, and perhaps more different still if it were in one of the social or natural sciences. I should also acknowledge that the experience on which I am drawing has been gained from working in comparatively favourable circumstances within highly regarded and (for the most part) well-supported universities, first at the University of Sussex from the mid-1970s to the mid-1980s, and subsequently at the University of Cambridge. I recognize that anyone who works in such institutions needs to be regularly reminded that the activities of teaching and scholarship may have to be pursued in much more constraining circumstances elsewhere.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «What are Universities For?»

Look at similar books to What are Universities For?. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «What are Universities For?»

Discussion, reviews of the book What are Universities For? and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.