• Complain

John Horgan - The End of War

Here you can read online John Horgan - The End of War full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: San Francisco, year: 2011, publisher: McSweeneys Books, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

John Horgan The End of War
  • Book:
    The End of War
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    McSweeneys Books
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2011
  • City:
    San Francisco
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

The End of War: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The End of War" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

War is a fact of human nature. As long as we exist, it exists. Thats how the argument goes. But longtime Scientific American writer John Horgan disagrees. Applying the scientific method to war leads Horgan to a radical conclusion: biologically speaking, we are just as likely to be peaceful as violent. War is not preordained, and furthermore, it should be thought of as a solvable, scientific problem--like curing cancer. But war and cancer differ in at least one crucial way: whereas cancer is a stubborn aspect of nature, war is our creation. Its our choice whether to unmake it or not. Read more... Living in wartime --
War is not innate --
You cant blame it all on a few bad apples --
Does resource scarcity make us fight? (No, not necessarily) --
Is war a cultural contageon? (Yes) --
Choosing peace --
The power of nonviolence --
In defense of free will --
Appendix : a brief prehistory of nonviolence.

John Horgan: author's other books


Who wrote The End of War? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The End of War — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The End of War" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Table of Contents For Valerie INTRODUCTION Living in Wartime I have - photo 1
Table of Contents
For Valerie
INTRODUCTION
Living in Wartime
I have never served in the military, shot at someone, or been shot at. And yet like everyone else alive today, I have always lived in wars shadow. My grandfather and father were both Navy men. My grandfather, who fought in both World Wars, commanded a troop carrier during the Allied invasions of Salerno and Anzio and was buried in Arlington National Cemetery in 1989. My father attended the Naval Academy and served on a destroyer in World War II. In August 1945, his ship picked up survivors of the Indianapolis after it was torpedoed and sunk by a Japanese submarine. Out of 1,196 men on the ship, 880 died, many of them eaten by sharks. Shortly before being sunk, the Indianapolis had delivered parts of Little Boy, the bomb that destroyed Hiroshima, to a U.S. air base.
When I was a boy, my father let me play with a Japanese rifle, with the bayonet attached, that he had brought back from the war. The sonic booms of military jets rattled the windows of our house in suburban Connecticut. At my elementary school, teachers instructed my classmates and me to cover our eyes and duck under our desks if we saw a big flash outside. When I graduated from high school, the Vietnam War was raging. I avoided the draft by drawing a high number in the lottery.
Years later I became a science journalist, and I gravitated toward war-related topics. I reported on debates among anthropologists over whether war stems primarily from nature or nurture. I took field trips to the Los Alamos, Lawrence Livermore, and Sandia National Laboratories, where nuclear weapons are designed, and to the Nevada Test Site, a stretch of desert pocked by the craters of hundreds of nuclear detonations. In 1991, after the Persian Gulf War, I traveled to Kuwait to investigate the environmental effects of the oil wells set aflame by Iraqi troops. I toured the highway of death north of Kuwait City, where U.S. planes strafed and bombed Iraqis fleeing back to Baghdad. The bodies had been removed, but the shattered Iraqi trucks, tanks, and troops carriers still reeked of rotting flesh. Sometimes the smoke from the oil fires grew so thick I couldnt see my notebook.
Even in Philipstown, the idyllic township in the Hudson Highlands where I have lived since 1990, war intrudes. You can occasionally hear the thunder of mortars and howitzers from the artillery range at the West Point Military Academy, across the river from us. If the wind is blowing in the right direction, the rat-tat-tat of small-arms fire drifts northward from Camp Smith, an Army training base south of Philipstown where troops practice anti-insurgency maneuvers.
On September 11, 2001, I climbed a hill near my home and looked south toward the New York skyline. I could see only smoke where the Twin Towers had once been visible above the horizon. As I made my way back home, my thoughts turned to my kids, Mac (who was eight then) and Skye (who was six). What would I tell them about this terrible event? How would this affect their lives? Peace seemed awfully remote on 9/11, and during the subsequent U.S. invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. In spite of these setbacks, I have faith that Mac and Skye will live to see a world without war.
MY SURVEYS
Not many people share this faith. I first realized how pessimistic most people are about the prospects for permanent peace in 2003, during the U.S. invasion of Iraq. An Episcopal priest in my hometown, Frank Geer, asked me to speak to his congregation about whether war is in our genes. I told Franks parishioners that war seems to be both primordial and perhaps partially innate; chimpanzees, our closest genetic relatives, engage in deadly group raids, and so did prehistoric humans. Some men seem to get a kick out of killing; the New York Times had just quoted an Army sharpshooter saying, We had a great day. We killed a lot of people. Nonetheless I ended with the obligatory upbeat coda: if the capacity for war is in our genes, so is the capacity for peace. We will end war someday, I said. The only question is how, and how soon.
I expected my neighbors to share my hope, just as most shared my dovish politics. But when I asked the sixty or so audience members if they thought humanity would ever abolish war, only a dozenhesitantlyraised their hands. This was no anomaly. Ever since that evening, Ive obsessively asked people whether they think war will end, once and for all. Ive carried out polls whenever I have a captive audienceat talks Ive given around the U.S. and in Europe, on the internet, at parties, even in the street. Over 80 percent of those Ive queriedliberal, conservative, male, female, affluent, poor, educated, uneducatedsay that war will never end.
A survey I carried out for the show RadioLab was typical. I approached a score of pedestrians on the streets of Hoboken, where I teach, and asked them if humans would ever stop fighting wars. I got three tentative Yeses and seventeen immediate, adamant Nos. No, replied Mark, a sixty-year-old dentist, because of greed, and one-upmanship, and the hierarchy of power, in which everybody wants more. War is a universal law of life, agreed Patel, a twenty-four-year-old computer scientist. To get something, you have to fight for something.
Young people seem especially fatalistic. I teach a course called War and Human Nature at my university. One assignment requires my students to ask ten or more classmates: Will humans ever stop fighting wars, once and for all? Why or why not? More than 90 percent of the four hundred or so respondents said no. The justifications were diverse: Were naturally evil was especially common. People are always going to hate and try to destroy inferiors. Monkeys fight with each other and because humans are animals too, we follow that pattern. Men are power crazy and women are not in power. People would just get bored with no war.
Even more disconcertingly, some of those who answered Yes revealed in their explanations that they were actually pessimists: Yes, because in the future the human species will unite to fight alien species. Yes, but it will only happen under the same one religion, because ones beliefs are a driving force. Yes. When someone (Korea) launches a nuclear weapon. Then well all stop messing with each other and keep it cool. Yes. Humanity will end wars once everyone is killed. So, war will cease after we band together to fight alien invaders, we all convert to the same religion, we undergo a nuclear attack, or we all die.
Many authorities on war share this lack of faith. One of the Hudson Highlands chief cultural attractions is the West Point Museum of the U.S. Military Academy. The museum offers a tour of the entire history of weaponry: Paleolithic stone axes, slings, chariots, crossbows, cannons (which during the Civil War were forged in Philipstown, where I live), blunderbusses, pistols, grenades, mortars, howitzers, machine guns, tanks, and bombers. The tour culminates with a replica of Fat Man, the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki in 1945. The displays are weirdly reminiscent of those showing the evolution of life, with increasingly deadly weapons substituted for organisms.
Proclamations throughout the museum heighten the sense of wars inevitability. One, unattributed, reads: Unquestionably, war-making is an aspect of human nature which will continue as nations attempt to impose their will upon each other. Others quote Churchill: Nothing is worse than war? Dishonor is worse than war. Slavery is worse than war; Thucydides: Peace is an armistice in a war that is continuously going on; and Plato: Only the dead have seen the end of war. Actually, the museum got this final attribution wrong. The philosopher George Santayana uttered these words as a bitter rebuke to descriptions of World War I as the war to end all wars.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The End of War»

Look at similar books to The End of War. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The End of War»

Discussion, reviews of the book The End of War and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.