• Complain

Ray Raphael - Constitutional Myths: What We Get Wrong and How to Get It Right

Here you can read online Ray Raphael - Constitutional Myths: What We Get Wrong and How to Get It Right full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2013, publisher: New Press, The, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Constitutional Myths: What We Get Wrong and How to Get It Right
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    New Press, The
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2013
  • Rating:
    4 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 80
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Constitutional Myths: What We Get Wrong and How to Get It Right: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Constitutional Myths: What We Get Wrong and How to Get It Right" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Americans of late have taken to waving the Constitution in the air and proclaiming, The founders were on MY side! See, its all right here! But these phantom constitutions bear little relation to the historical one.
By entering the world of the Constitutions framers, and experiencing it one day after the next as they did, Ray Raphael helps us understand how and why they created the document they did. Casting aside preconceptions and commonly held beliefs, he asks provocative questions that get to the heart of the document and its purposes: Was the aim of the Constitution really to limit government? Why didnt the framers include a Bill of Rights? Did they hate taxes? Was James Madison actually the Father of the Constitution, as proclaimed in our textbooks? Can we find the true meaning of the Constitution by reading The Federalist Papers or by revealing the framers original intent? The answers to these questions are bound to surprise and enlighten.
Before we can consider what the framers would do if they were alive today, we first need to see what they did during their own time, not in our terms, but theirs. Only then can we begin to resolve the sweeping question that affects us all: what does the Constitution, written at a different time, mean for us today? With this meticulously researched historical tour de force, Raphael sets the record straightand sounds a vital call for a reasoned and evidence-driven debate about our founding document.

Ray Raphael: author's other books


Who wrote Constitutional Myths: What We Get Wrong and How to Get It Right? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Constitutional Myths: What We Get Wrong and How to Get It Right — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Constitutional Myths: What We Get Wrong and How to Get It Right" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

CONSTITUTIONAL
MYTHS

ALSO BY RAY RAPHAEL

FOUNDING ERA

A Peoples History of the American Revolution:
How Common People Shaped the Fight for Independence

The First American Revolution: Before Lexington and Concord

Founding Myths: Stories That Hide Our Patriotic Past

Founders: The People Who Brought You a Nation

The Complete Idiots Guide to the Founding
Fathers and the Birth of Our Nation

Mr. President: How and Why the Founders Created a Chief Executive

Revolutionary Founders: Rebels, Radicals, and Reformers in the Making of the Nation (co-edited with Alfred F. Young and Gary B. Nash)

CALIFORNIA HISTORY AND REGIONAL ISSUES

An Everyday History of Somewhere

Edges: Human Ecology of the Backcountry

Tree Talk: The People and Politics of Timber

Cash Crop: An American Dream

Little White Father: Redick McKee on the California Frontier

More Tree Talk: The People, Politics, and Economics of Timber

Two Peoples, One Place: Humboldt History,
volume 1 (with Freeman House)

EDUCATION AND SOCIOLOGY

The Teachers Voice: A Sense of Who We Are

The Men from the Boys: Rites of Passage in Male America

CONSTITUTIONAL
MYTHS

What We Get Wrong and How to Get It Right

Ray Raphael

Constitutional Myths What We Get Wrong and How to Get It Right - image 1

2013 by Ray Raphael

All rights reserved.

No part of this book may be reproduced, in any form, without written permission from the publisher.

Requests for permission to reproduce selections from this book should be mailed to: Permissions Department, The New Press, 38 Greene Street, New York, NY 10013.

Published in the United States by The New Press, New York, 2013

Distributed by Perseus Distribution

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA

Raphael, Ray.

Constitutional myths : what we get wrong and how to get it right / Ray Raphael.
pages cm

Includes bibliographical references and index.

ISBN 978-1-59558-838-8 (e-book) (print)1. Constitutional historyUnited States18th century.2. United StatesHistory17831815.I. Title.

KF4541.R3752013

342.7302'9dc23

2012041849

The New Press publishes books that promote and enrich public discussion and understanding of the issues vital to our democracy and to a more equitable world. These books are made possible by the enthusiasm of our readers; the support of a committed group of donors, large and small; the collaboration of our many partners in the independent media and the not-for-profit sector; booksellers, who often hand-sell New Press books; librarians; and above all by our authors.

www.thenewpress.com

Composition by dix!

This book was set in Fournier MT

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

For George Washington, who wanted government to work.

For Benjamin Franklin, smarter than us all but
still doubting his own infallibility.

For the Constitutions framers,
who did not believe compromise a sin.

For the founding generation, who kept the framers on their toes.

And for Americans todaymay we listen more, shout less,
and think to the future, as the framers did.

CONTENTS

O n September 17, 1947, the United States Constitution was taken for a ride, transported by a red, white, and blue diesel-electric locomotive christened The Spirit of Seventy-Six. Starting in Philadelphia, the documents birthplace, and journeying for more than a year, it was viewed by reverential crowds at some three hundred stops in all forty-eight states.

The precious cargo aboard the Freedom Train included not only the Constitution but also the Magna Carta, Thomas Jeffersons draft of the Declaration of Independence, and 124 other documents deemed critical to establishing and preserving Americas freedom. Some key amendments to the Constitution, however, failed to make the passenger list. The Fourteenth, with its promise of equal protection, and the Fifteenth, which prohibits racial discrimination in voting, were denied passage. At some stops in the South, the Freedom Train played to segregated audiences, whites entering the mobile museum at one time and blacks at another.

Today, traveling over the Internet and broadcast media, the Constitution is once again viewed by segregated audiences. The separation is voluntary this time, with the division following ideological lines that can be as uninformed and as stringent as bygone racial ones. People see in our governing document only what they wish to see. It is not a unifying force, as its authors had intended, but a wedge that widens the partisan divide.

Lost in our battle over the Constitution is the actual historical record. Constitutional Myths reintroduces that record and lays it alongside commonly accepted views. Based on in-depth accounts from founding times, not on later interpretations by interested citizens, professional historians, or even Supreme Court justices, it reveals how far our stories about the Constitution have strayed.

That historical record is both extensive and accessible. In the summer of 1787, as men we now call the framers conjured and debated evolving drafts of the Constitution, one of their number, James Madison, took meticulous notes. Seated immediately in front of the presiding officer, with other members on my right & left hands, Madison did not miss more than a casual fraction of an hour in any day, so that I could not have lost a single speech, unless a very short one. Other delegates to the Convention in Philadelphia took less comprehensive notes. After the framers released their handiwork and submitted it to the states for approval, thousands of other American citizens weighed in. These public debates, both written and oral, were recorded and preserved. Then, as the First Federal Congress struggled to put the Constitution to work, those proceedings were recorded as well. During this pivotal time in our nations history, men who played key roles in writing, ratifying, and implementing the Constitution wrote privately and extensively to each other, discussing both broad ideas and specific provisions.

To make sense of the abundant sources, Constitutional Myths constructs narrative timelines and sticks closely to them. Using the tried-and-true tool of basic chronology, it explores the context of what people said and did, for without context we have no history, just a jumble of things that happened. Citing the Constitution or the views of prominent founders without referring to context is great political sport, but it is also the quickest route to falsification. Political arguments are peppered with such phrases as Hamilton believed , According to Madison , or As Jefferson says Even serious scholars and jurists fall into the trap when they try to integrate statements made by a particular founder at various times and differing contexts into a single, coherent philosophy. Jefferson, Madison, and Adams engaged in political life or commented on politics for over half a century each, Washington and Franklin for four decades, Hamilton for twenty-five years.

Nor can history be understood by treating the past as if it were the present. Much has happened since the founders time: national expansion on a shrinking planet, nuclear and biological warfare, Internet and broadcast technologies, and so onmore than two centuries of subsequent history. Compare then and now. On October 15, 1789, President Washington set out from New York with only two aides and six servants to tour New England. In his diary, he chronicled the first day of his journey:

The road for the greater part, indeed the whole way, was very rough and stoney, but the land strong, well covered with grass and a luxurient crop of Indian corn intermixed with pompions [pumpkins] which were ungathered in the fields. We met four droves of beef cattle for the New York market (about 30 in a drove) some of which were very finealso a flock of sheep for the same place. We scarcely passed a farm house that did not abd. in geese.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Constitutional Myths: What We Get Wrong and How to Get It Right»

Look at similar books to Constitutional Myths: What We Get Wrong and How to Get It Right. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Constitutional Myths: What We Get Wrong and How to Get It Right»

Discussion, reviews of the book Constitutional Myths: What We Get Wrong and How to Get It Right and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.