• Complain

Eisenhower Dwight David - The President and the apprentice : Eisenhower and Nixon, 1952-1961

Here you can read online Eisenhower Dwight David - The President and the apprentice : Eisenhower and Nixon, 1952-1961 full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Array, year: 2015, publisher: Yale University Press, genre: Politics. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover

The President and the apprentice : Eisenhower and Nixon, 1952-1961: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The President and the apprentice : Eisenhower and Nixon, 1952-1961" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Irwin Gellman has emerged from years in the archives to tell the fascinating story of President Dwight Eisenhower and his relationship with his vice president, Richard Nixon. Gellman dispels the fog that has long enveloped this subject and casts new light on a critical Cold War presidency. Masterfully written, The President and the Apprentice is a must-read for anyone who, like me, loves good political history.Allen Matusow, author of The Unraveling of America
More than half a century after Eisenhower left office, the history of his presidency is so clouded by myth, partisanship, and outright fraud that most people have little understanding of how Ikes administration worked or what it accomplished. We knowor think we knowthat Eisenhower distrusted his vice president, Richard Nixon, and kept him at arms length; that he did little to advance civil rights; that he sat by as Joseph McCarthys reckless anticommunist campaign threatened to wreck his administration; and that he planned the disastrous 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba. None of this is true.
The President and the Apprentice reveals a different Eisenhower, and a different Nixon. Ike trusted and relied on Nixon, sending him on many sensitive overseas missions. Eisenhower, not Truman, completed the desegregation of the military. Eisenhower and Nixon, not Lyndon Johnson, pushed the Civil Rights Act of 1957 through the Senate. Eisenhower was determined to bring down McCarthy and did so. Nixon never, contrary to recent accounts, saw a psychotherapist, but while Ike was recovering from his heart attack in 1955, Nixon was overworked, overanxious, overmedicated, and at the limits of his ability to function.
Based on twenty years of research in numerous archives, many previously untouched, this book offers a fresh and surprising account of the Eisenhower presidency.
Irwin Gellmans superb research and plausible reconstruction of the Eisenhower-Nixon relationship may well revolutionize the meaning of historical revisionism. The President and the Apprentice is an unsettling tour de force.David Levering Lewis, author of King: A Biography and W.E.B. Du Bois: A Biography, winner of the Pulitzer Prize for Biography

Eisenhower Dwight David: author's other books


Who wrote The President and the apprentice : Eisenhower and Nixon, 1952-1961? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The President and the apprentice : Eisenhower and Nixon, 1952-1961 — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The President and the apprentice : Eisenhower and Nixon, 1952-1961" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Published with assistance from the Mary Cady Tew Memorial Fund.

Copyright 2015 by Irwin F. Gellman. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers.

Yale University Press books may be purchased in quantity for educational, business, or promotional use. For information, please e-mail (U.K. office).

Set in Electra type by Westchester Publishing Services. Printed in the United States of America.

Library of Congress Control Number: 2015935011
ISBN 978-0-300-18105-0 (cloth : alk. paper)

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.

This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992
(Permanence of Paper).

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

To Ruth Ann Segerstrom Moriarty
with
gratitude and love

THE PRESIDENT AND THE APPRENTICE THE PRESIDENT AND THE APPRENTICE - photo 1

THE PRESIDENT AND THE APPRENTICE

THE PRESIDENT AND THE APPRENTICE

Eisenhower and Nixon 19521961 Irwin F Gellman C - photo 2

Eisenhower and Nixon, 19521961

Irwin F Gellman CONTENTS PREFACE - photo 3

Irwin F. Gellman

CONTENTS PREFACE When Herbert Brownell Jr told Dwight D Eisenhower that - photo 4

CONTENTS PREFACE When Herbert Brownell Jr told Dwight D Eisenhower that - photo 5

CONTENTS

PREFACE When Herbert Brownell Jr told Dwight D Eisenhower that his advisers - photo 6
PREFACE

When Herbert Brownell Jr. told Dwight D. Eisenhower that his advisers had selected Richard M. Nixon as his running mate in 1952, the general readily concurred. Ike saw in Nixon a young, talented politician who, like himself, was a strong foe of communism and had distinguished himself as a congressman in 1948 by his pursuit of Alger Hiss, later shown to have spied for the Soviet Union. Eisenhower would also come to value Nixons political insight and his ability to connect with his Republican constituency. Not yet forty years old at the time he was nominated, Nixon saw his place on the 1952 ticket as a priceless opportunity, and he never lost his determination to make the most of it. Yet he never completely understood Ikes military character and would be left dumbfounded by some of Ikes decisions.

The two men were never partners. Theirs was not a strange political marriage, as Jeffrey Frank claims in Ike and Dick. Eisenhower, the supreme commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force in World War II, the former chief of staff of the Army, the first supreme commander of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, did not have partners. He led a team of subordinates, who were expected to go where Ike sent them, be his eyes and ears, provide intelligent and informed advice, deliver his messages, execute his decisions, and occasionally become casualties. Whether the battlefield was military or political, Ike often had his soldiers take the heat instead of himself.

Having seen how unprepared Harry S Truman was to assume the presidency on Franklin D. Roosevelts death, Eisenhower kept Vice President Nixon aware of most of the decisions made in the White House. Nixon attended Ikes weekly meetings, presided in Ikes absence, acted as a liaison with both houses of Congress, met with dozens of foreign heads of state, and tirelessly represented the administration on the campaign trail. He had more responsibility and more authority than any vice president before him. He shared frequent breakfasts and lunches with the president, and was one of a small circle of advisers who could walk into the Oval Office without an appointment. When Eisenhower, after a futile year of trying to get Joseph McCarthy to cooperate with his administration, decided in 1954 that the senator was doing far more harm than good, Nixon was part of the small team that ruined him. When Eisenhower wanted to advance the cause of civil rights, he turned to Nixon, first as the head of the Presidents Committee on Government Contracts, and then as the point man in passing the Civil Rights Act of 1957. (Some historians have given the credit for this legislation largely to thenSenate majority leader Lyndon Johnson, but Johnson actually eviscerated two major provisions that were unacceptable to the southern caucus.)

Nixon evolved into one of Ikes most valuable subordinates. When Eisenhower suffered a major heart attack in September 1955, Nixon, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, and White House chief of staff Sherman Adams were largely in charge of the White House for several months. At the time, the public did not know the severity of Eisenhowers illness, nor did anyone know that Nixon, over-stressed and overmedicated, was at the very limits of his ability to function in the first half of 1956. Nor did John Foster Dulles reveal that his cancer surgery that year had been unsuccessful; he would die in the spring of 1959.

Both Eisenhower and Dulles relied increasingly on Nixon as a foreign policy counselor. Nixons trips to Asia, Latin America, Africa, Eastern Europe, and the Soviet Union were never ceremonial goodwill journeys; he conducted delicate business and sometimes tense negotiations with foreign leaders, and he gave Eisenhower detailed reports on what he saw, heard, and did. In the process, he became close friends with Dulles. This immersion in foreign affairs as vice president gave Nixon the background, when he became president, to conduct a foreign policy that included winding down the war in Vietnam, dtente with the Soviet Union, and a historic opening of relations with China.

Little of this is known, or properly understood.

Instead, many historians, journalists, and others have advanced the proposition that Ike and Nixon disliked each other and barely spoke throughout the Eisenhower presidency. In past decades, critics described Ikes presidential leadership as inept and Nixon as hyperpartisan. While Ikes image has improved to that of a near-great or great president, Nixon remains an inconsequential vice president. This divergence in their reputations has created a paradox: given that Eisenhower is now seen as firmly in control of his administration, and that he was so wildly popular that he certainly did not need Nixons help to win the presidency, why did he allow Nixon to stay on the ticket? Even if we concede that he might have done so once by mistake, in 1952, why did Ike run with him again four years later?

At this point, more than a half-century since Eisenhower left office, the fog of misunderstanding has become bipartisan. The conservative British historian Paul Johnsons slim volume Eisenhower: A Life, published in 2014 and based entirely on secondary sources, includes just a single paragraph on the presidents relationship with his vice president.

Ikes attitude toward Nixon remains a mystery to this day. He behaved toward his vice president throughout the eight years they served together as if he were a burden or an embarrassment rather than an asset. Asked if Nixon had ever made a positive contribution to his administration, Ike avoided an answer and said hed like to think about it. Of course Ike had never chosen Nixon to run with him. And he disliked having around him a man he could not fire. (p. 107)

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The President and the apprentice : Eisenhower and Nixon, 1952-1961»

Look at similar books to The President and the apprentice : Eisenhower and Nixon, 1952-1961. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The President and the apprentice : Eisenhower and Nixon, 1952-1961»

Discussion, reviews of the book The President and the apprentice : Eisenhower and Nixon, 1952-1961 and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.