• Complain

Regina M Janes - Inventing Afterlives: The Stories We Tell Ourselves about Life After Death

Here you can read online Regina M Janes - Inventing Afterlives: The Stories We Tell Ourselves about Life After Death full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2018, publisher: Columbia University Press, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Regina M Janes Inventing Afterlives: The Stories We Tell Ourselves about Life After Death
  • Book:
    Inventing Afterlives: The Stories We Tell Ourselves about Life After Death
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Columbia University Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2018
  • Rating:
    3 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 60
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Inventing Afterlives: The Stories We Tell Ourselves about Life After Death: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Inventing Afterlives: The Stories We Tell Ourselves about Life After Death" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Why is belief in an afterlife so persistent across times and cultures? And how can it coexist with disbelief in an afterlife? Most modern thinkers hold that afterlife belief serves such important psychological and social purposes as consoling survivors, enforcing morality, dispensing justice, or giving life meaning. Yet the earliest, and some more recent, afterlives strikingly fail to satisfy those needs.
InInventing Afterlives,Regina M. Janes proposes a new theory of the origins of the hereafter rooted in the question that a dead body raises: where has the life gone? Humans then and now, in communities and as individuals, ponder what they would want or experience were they in that body. From this endlessly recurring situation, afterlife narratives develop in all their complexity, variety, and ingenuity. Exploring afterlives from Egypt to Sumer, among Jews, Greeks, and Romans, to Christianitys advent and Islams rise, Janes reveals how little concern ancient afterlives had with morality. In south and east Asia, karmic rebirth makes morality self-enforcing and raises a new problem: how to stop re-dying. The British enlightenment, Janes argues, invented the now widespread wish-fulfilling afterlife and illustrates how afterlives change. She also considers the surprising afterlife of afterlives among modern artists and writers who no longer believe in worlds beyond this one. Drawing on a variety of religious traditions; contemporary literature and film; primatology; cognitive science; and evolutionary psychology, Janes shows that in asking what happens after we die, we define the worlds we inhabit and the values by which we live.

Regina M Janes: author's other books


Who wrote Inventing Afterlives: The Stories We Tell Ourselves about Life After Death? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Inventing Afterlives: The Stories We Tell Ourselves about Life After Death — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Inventing Afterlives: The Stories We Tell Ourselves about Life After Death" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Table of Contents
INVENTING AFTERLIVES INVENTING AFTERLIVES THE STORIES WE TELL OURSELVES - photo 1
INVENTING AFTERLIVES
INVENTING AFTERLIVES
THE STORIES WE TELL OURSELVES ABOUT LIFE AFTER DEATH
Picture 2
REGINA M. JANES
Columbia University Press
New York
Picture 3
Columbia University Press
Publishers Since 1893
New York Chichester, West Sussex
cup.columbia.edu
Copyright 2018 Columbia University Press
Gabriel from Gabriel: A Poem by Edward Hirsch, copyright 2014 by Edward Hirsch. Used by permission of Alfred A. Knopf, an imprint of the Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, a division of Penguin Random House LLC. All rights reserved.
I Am a Cat, by Natsume Sseki, copyright 2002 by Aiko Ito and Graeme Wilson. Used by permission of Tuttle Publishing, a division of Periplus Editions (HK) Ltd.
All rights reserved
E-ISBN 978-0-231-54629-4
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Janes, Regina M., author.
Title: Inventing afterlives : the stories we tell ourselves about life after death / Regina M. Janes.
Description: 1 [edition]. | New York : Columbia University Press, 2018. | Includes bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2018000804 (print) | LCCN 2018009938 (e-book) | ISBN 9780231546294 (e-book) | ISBN 9780231185707 (cloth : alk. paper) | ISBN 9780231185714 (paperback)
Subjects: LCSH: Future life.
Classification: LCC BL535 (e-book) | LCC BL535 .J35 2018 (print) | DDC 202/.3dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018000804
A Columbia University Press E-book.
CUP would be pleased to hear about your reading experience with this e-book at .
Cover design: Lisa Hamm
Cover image: Amy Weiss/Trevillion Images
IN MEMORIAM DALE E. WOOLLEY
AND FOR CHARLES, THE ONLY AFTERLIFE DALE EVER TOOK AN INTEREST IN
Picture 4
CONTENTS
LEO (July 23Aug. 22)
The FBI will have to ask you some tough questions next week, such as whether true love really exists and what happens after we die.
HOROSCOPE, THE ONION, OCTOBER 1319, 2011, 9.
D avid Hume had an answer for the FBI. The single most famous event in that British philosophers life was a visit James Boswell, Samuel Johnsons biographer-to-be, paid him in 1776. Nothing endears so much a friend as sorrow for his death, Hume had observed, yet it was not sorrow moving Boswell to Humes side, but curiosity. As Hume lay dying, Boswell came to see how an atheist died. Serenely and cheerfully, was the answer, with no itchy desire after eternal life, no fear of roasting in flames, no apprehensions about annihilation, and no dread of the gaping gap of vanished consciousness. Boswell had bad dreams for a week.
To begin a book about afterlives with someone who did not believe in one may seem perverse, but it has a purpose. Everyone has some belief, or beliefs, about what happens after death, even if the belief is that nothing at all happens or that nothing can be known about what happens or that there is no point even thinking about it. Once death becomes a phenomenon that human beings can think and talk about, we inevitably ask, So what comes next; whats after that? The question applies both to the dead and to the survivors, and answers range from nothing to eternities. Whatever the answer, it establishes our relationship to the cosmos we live in: what it means, what it is for, and how we are to live within it while we live.
Death, of course, has at once everything and nothing to do with the afterlife. Afterlives are narratives made by the living in order to define the relationship between the living and the dead, between the self and the prospect of its own death, between survivors and those who have disappeared from the social unit. Death is the limit that provokes those fictions. Out of deaths blank wall, we want to make a gate, and then we demand to know what is on the other side of the gate. Hume vanished without fear. Boswell lived less happily, complaining of his melancholy the year before Hume died, [A]ll the doubts which have ever disturbed thinking men, come upon me. I awake in the night, dreading annihilation or being thrown into some horrible state of being. Many presume on paradise.
The word afterlife presupposes some posthumous existence, pleasant or unpleasant, but beliefs about what happens after life include the denial of any such existence. Whether an afterlife is affirmed or denied, the afterlife narrative overcomes death, dominates it, and reintegrates death and the dead into the continuing self-conceptions of the living. When blurb writers exclaim, This book is not about death, its really about how to live! they are describing not a happy accident but a necessary fact.
As the word changes, so does the concept, less state and more life.
In religious studies, afterlives accompany the complex and nuanced understanding of a religious tradition over time and in time. Scholars maintain a careful professional agnosticism as to the reality of intrinsically unverifiable afterlives and the claims of contending traditions. What a tradition maintains as to immortality is accepted as given, while its chops and changes, responses to political and intellectual ferment, differences from itself from moment to moment, form the object of study. Creating new knowledge through meticulous detail, religious-studies scholars are rightly suspicious of grand historical narratives and ahistorical cognitive arguments. This study proceeds otherwise.
It proposes a fable of origins in cognitive studies because the irreligious, too, need to be accounted for. As unbelievers like Hume demonstrate, there is no hard wiring of afterlife belief (or God), but afterlife beliefs (like God) do originate in human sociality and cognition, that is, language. Other primates recognize death and dislike it, but they have nothing to say about it. Human afterlife talk weaves death into lifes narrative, if only to write FINIS, as Walter Benjamin implies. Religious traditions occasionally recount the origins of their afterlife beliefs, while those outside those traditions (and outside of religious studies) commonly explain away those beliefs in functional terms ranging from condescending to paranoid: as compensatory or consoling or ethical or controlling or imitative or stolen.
Yet the earliest attested afterlife beliefs (and some still current) are not compensatory, consoling, ethical, or controlling. Nor can we know what they may imitate or from whom they may have been stolen. They neither satisfy human desires nor have anything to do with justice or morality. Some other explanation is necessary, for people wanting explanations. The human mind seems the place to look. But not just the mind: human minds are always (already) social. Proposed is an ahistorical account that accommodates both the cognitive quandary death poses and the social injury it creates.
This ahistorical deep structure (a modern mythos) supports, but does not determine, the variety afterlives display in changing socio-political and economic circumstances. That morality and the afterlife originate independently is not immediately obvious. The misery of some early afterlives we have never known, and we have forgotten the horrors of earlier iterations of our own. Only very latelyand still not universallydo justice and morality attach themselves to afterlife beliefs, and only in the enlightenment does human happiness come to dominate afterlife expectations. These claims require demonstration that only a narrative traversing many places and times can supply, if they are to persuade.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Inventing Afterlives: The Stories We Tell Ourselves about Life After Death»

Look at similar books to Inventing Afterlives: The Stories We Tell Ourselves about Life After Death. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Inventing Afterlives: The Stories We Tell Ourselves about Life After Death»

Discussion, reviews of the book Inventing Afterlives: The Stories We Tell Ourselves about Life After Death and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.