Easy Meat:
Inside Britains Grooming Gang Scandal
Peter McLoughlin
Copyright Peter McLoughlin 2016
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without permission in writing from the publisher except by reviewers who may quote brief passages in their reviews.
Published by New English Review Press
a subsidiary of World Encounter Institute
PO Box 158397
Nashville, Tennessee 37215
&
27 Old Gloucester Street
London, England, WC1N 3AX
Cover Art & Design by Kendra Mallock
ISBN: 978-1-943003-07-5
E-Book Edition
NEW ENGLISH REVIEW PRESS
newenglishreview.org
T]here is a specific problem which involves Pakistani heritage men... who target vulnerable young white girls. We need to get the Pakistani community to think much more clearly about why this is going on and to be more open about the problems that are leading to a number of Pakistani heritage men thinking it is OK to target white girls in this way.... These young men are in a western society, in any event, they act like any other young men, theyre fizzing and popping with testosterone, they want some outlet for that, but Pakistani heritage girls are off-limits and they are expected to marry a Pakistani girl from Pakistan, typically. So they then seek other avenues and they see these young women, white girls who are vulnerable, some of them in care... who they think are easy meat.
Jack Straw, Member of Parliament (1979-2015), Jan. 2011
Narrated Aisha:
I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allahs Messenger used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for `Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.)
Sahih al-Bukhari Book 78, Hadith 157
http://sunnah.com/bukhari/78/157
Narrated Hishams father:
Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married `Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.
Sahih al-Bukhari Book 63, Hadith 122
http://sunnah.com/bukhari/63/122
Foreword
T HIS IS A shocking book. It is written with care, but the facts seem hard to believe. Be prepared, because there is something to feel angry about on most pages: how much of this crime there is; how long it has gone on; its blatancy; and the lengths power has gone to to cover it up. But worst of all, the victims helplessness and pain.
That anger will spread as knowledge of this crime spreads. Looking away wont work any more. But the more you look at this crime, the worse you realise it is. And this stops people looking at it.
It is hard to think of a crime more apt to cause public rage than the rape of native girls by immigrant gangs. Rapes long use as a weapon shows the fear and anger it causes.
And this is the basis of our plea to the powers that be to stamp out this crime by any lawful means. We ask them to think of the threat to their grip on power.
Vigilante gangs disable society. Their violence is a short cut from Queens peace to all against all. It tears at the fabric of law. If that violence can be used on child rapists then thieves and cheats will be next.
The threat of vigilante justice
Let me tell a story about how power can spin out of the systems hands. It is violent, but violence is what happens when hate meets civil chaos. I have tried to play down the facts to assuage the sensitive.
A group of ex soldiers, with weapons and intelligence training, are bored with their new lives. They are tired of the pubs which keep them in touch with each other and with what gave a sense of pride and purpose. Their patriotism is weak in the face of serious crime.
They formed a dim view of Islamic ways on their tours of Iraq and Afghanistan. And its growth in Britain is now a serious gripe, fuelled by beer and boredom. Gripes turn to rage at the child rape gangs. And rage turns to boasts about how fast they could deal with them.
One of them talks about how many Muslims are guilty of grooming crimes relative to the number of Muslims in the land. Hes been looking at the news reports and seen that pretty much the lot of them have Muslim names. Despite being only 5% of the population. They work out that Muslims look to be 170 times likelier to do this than non-Muslims.
One of them points out that its worse than that. Theres not one case where the girl was a Muslim and the men were non-Muslims: Theyre raping our kids. Were not raping their kids.
They say they could put a stop to it once and for all. They mean, if they were given the chance, like.
Mad at each new crop of bearded thugs staring from the front pages, their talk gets more sober. Weeks later, reports of useless police work turn sober talk to planning. Tipped off about a bed-and-breakfast joint where this crime happens, planning turns to sober acts.
But they dont plan a reprisal raid, as one or two Sikh groups seem to have done. For them, prevention is better than cure.
One of them gets a tip-off from a jaded child protection worker. They watch the premises, see when the 13 year old girl is led into the house. And at what times the clients come in. Then one night they lie in wait.
They force their way in. A terrible massacre follows. They shoot dead all the men in the room, at point blank range.
They are caught, held, and charged. They plead not guilty.
The dreadful scene proves the killings. CCTV puts them at the scene. So they admit the facts but claim the defence of prevention of a crime. The prosecution must rebut this defence beyond reasonable doubt, and argue that the mens acts were not reasonable because too much force was used.
The Defendants cite American laws that allows deadly force against burglars, even if the owner is not at risk. The same laws have been touted for this country, with public support. They state that most people think the gang rape of children is worse than burglary. They refer to the BBC report, No charge for Texas dad who killed daughters rapist story, and the comments beneath.
The prosecution say the killers could have told the authorities. But the killers point out that the authorities already knew. They got their tip off from a Council worker. And nothing had been done about it.
The judge is rightly worried by the mens defence. But she must let it go to the jury. She guides them properly. Can killing be reasonable when police and the Councils are paid to stop child rape?
The jury retire but cant reach a verdict. Later, news reports say half the jurors saw no wrong in killing child rape gangs.
A retrial is held, and, unusually, a second retrial. But still no verdict. So the judge tells the foreman to acquit.
The celebrations outside the court have more to do with football chants than analysis of the dovetail joint between law and civil society.
News of the acquittal spreads fast. Other gangs learn that it is OK to kill child rapists, especially those Muslim ones.
In some parts, these vigilante gangs are soon the people to go to with crimes and disputes. They even open their own brothels. And some of those are a bit casual about age limits. The liberal press spot this irony. But the police are slow to come down for fear of spoiling a calm stalemate.
We dont paint this foul scene to gloat, but to warn. It is not so far fetched as we hope. Once conflict breaks out, it hides every sin. The ruthless know this. And a lack of law, the need for safety, enables them to pull in those around them.
Next page