Simon Blackburn - Philosophy

Philosophy

Simon Blackburn

Quercus Publishing Plc

21 Bloomsbury Square

London

WC1A 2NS

First published in 2009

Copyright 2009 Simon Blackburn

The moral right of Simon Blackburn to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Design and Patents Act, 1988.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission in writing of the copyright owner and publisher.

The picture credits constitute an extension to this copyright notice.

Every effort has been made to contact copyright holders. However, the publishers will be glad to rectify in future editions any inadvertent omissions brought to their attention.

Quercus Publishing Plc hereby exclude all liability to the extent permitted by law for any errors or omissions in this book and for any loss, damage or expense (whether direct or indirect) suffered by a third party relying on any information contained in this book.

A catalogue record of this book is available from the British Library

eBook ISBN 978 1 84916 607 2

Print ISBN

UK and associated territories: 978 1 84916 000 1

Canada: 978 1 84866 092 2

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

You can find this and many other great books at:
www.quercusbooks.co.uk

Simon Blackburn is Professor of Philosophy
at the University of Cambridge, Research
Professor of Philosophy at the University of
North Carolina and one of the most
distinguished philosophers of our day.

He is the author of the bestselling books
The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Think,
Being Good, Lust, Truth: A Guide for the
Perplexed and How to Read Hume.

The Big Questions confronts the fundamental
problems of science and philosophy that have
perplexed enquiring minds throughout history, and
provides and explains the answers of our greatest
thinkers. This ambitious series is a unique, accessible
and concise distillation of humanitys best ideas.

Titles in The Big Questions series include:

PHILOSOPHY
PHYSICS
UNIVERSE
MATHEMATICS

The twenty questions I have chosen here are among those that often occur to thoughtful men, women and children. They seem to arise naturally, without powers of reflection. We want to know the answers. Yet philosophy is unusual among academic disciplines in appearing to cherish the questions rather than provide the answers. The tradition contains few agreed and definitive solutions. This may be a matter of regret or embarrassment to those of us who work as academic philosophers, but I do not think it should be. This is partly because some questions which appear simple and straightforward at first glance fragment into many other little questions on reflection. We ask, Why be moral? or What is the meaning of life? as if one answer might be around the corner. But perhaps there are many different questions. Why be moral in this particular way on this particular occasion, faced with this, that or the other temptation? Which of the things that can interest and engage people deserve to do so? There will be many answers in different contexts, rather than one big answer, and it is progress to realize this.

Other questions may have different concealed traps in them. Why is there something rather than nothing? is a good example. Although it is sometimes thought to be the fundamental question of philosophy, the deepest question anyone can ask, it may be that its depth, and the obsessive interest it can engender, are the artefact of a logical trick ensuring that it is unanswerable. Or perhaps not: these are matters on which we have to tread carefully, and not all thinkers will tread the same path. I do not think we should lament that or be embarrassed about that. We would not all tread the same path if we tried to write essays about almost any human affairs: just imagine the different lights in which a political decision or a family holiday (or family quarrel) may appear to different participants and observers. Shakespeare wrote wonderful plays about love, war, fear, ambition and many other things, but nobody believes that he gave definitive answers or that there is nothing left to add.

So I have tried to acquaint the reader with the questions, with some of the things that get said, and with some of the pitfalls and perplexities surrounding them.

The twenty questions I have chosen are here arranged in no particular order, except for the last one, which comes last for all of us. The discussions are intended to be self-contained, and therefore readers are welcome to dip in wherever they wish. Since there are occasional cross-references, they may find themselves drawn backwards or forwards as the case may be, and I hope that they are.

The 21st century continues a trend also visible in the last century. This is a certain kind of scientific triumphalism. The euphoria that came with cracking the human genome, and the dazzling prospects of unlimited biological and medical progress that this encouraged, have contributed to an atmosphere in which humane studies like philosophy are put on the defensive. Insofar as we philosophers do things like interpreting human nature, then is philosophy itself due for retirement, overtaken and superseded by the juggernaut of advancing science? In a number of chapters I reflect on the actual achievements and promises of the new sciences of human nature, not always with quite the confidence that others seem to feel. I hope that the reasons in play at least raise some doubts, and enable others to approach the difficult problems of how we do think and feel, and then how we ought to think and feel, with proper respect.

I owe thanks to my agent, Catherine Clarke, and to my editor at Quercus, Wayne Davies, for unfailing encouragement. I owe thanks, as ever, to my wife whose editorial and literary help have been invaluable. The University of Cambridge granted me a sabbatical term in 2008 which gave me the leisure to write many of the following chapters, while the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill provided a research chair from which to work, and I am most grateful to both institutions.

The search for consciousness

Everyone knows that we are creatures of flesh and blood. Included in the flesh is a nice big brain, an unimaginably complex assemblage of some hundred billion neurons or brain cells, each with around a thousand connections with others: many trillions of connections in all.

The human brain controls memory, vision, learning, thought and voluntary behaviour. It also monitors and plays a part in controlling the involuntary behaviour and the autonomic activities of our organic support systems. Different sense organs respond to physical stimuli, and thence transmit signals to dedicated parts of the brain, which then work together to enable us to see, feel, taste, smell, remember and compare and classify things. Most of the time it all works magically well, and we only get a sense of its wonderfully fragile nature when things go wrong. A small amount of neuronal damage, and we have people who think that the person in the mirror is not themselves but someone different, or who cannot remember who or where they are, or who think their wife is a hat. A small shadow on a scan, and Alzheimers terrifyingly awaits a great many of us.