Vincent Michael Colapietro - Reason, experience, and God: John E. Smith in dialogue

Reason, experience, and God: John E. Smith in dialogue — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Reason, experience, and God: John E. Smith in dialogue" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

↓

↑

Georgia Tahoma Arial Verdana

Reset

Interval:

↓

↑

Bookmark:

Make

1234567...57

---

title	:	Reason, Experience, and God : John E. Smith in Dialogue American Philosophy Series, 1073-2764 ; No. 7
author	:	Colapietro, Vincent Michael
publisher	:	Fordham University Press
isbn10 | asin	:	0823217078
print isbn13	:	9780823217076
ebook isbn13	:	9780585171104
language	:	English
subject	Smith, John Edwin--Congresses.
publication date	:	1997
lcc	:	B945.S7144R43 1997eb
ddc	:	191
subject	:	Smith, John Edwin--Congresses.

ERRATUM On page 101, at the end of the fourth line after the extract the following text and footnote should be inserted: between Augustine and Anselm on the one hand, and Aquinas on the other, is highly questionable, as is also the claim that Aquinas was saying, but in a clearer and more explicit way, what his predecessors were saying. Thomas's reservations about illuminationism, for example, included his dismissal of the ontological argument and his denial that the first principlesVerum, Bonum, Esseare "closer" to the divine essence than the sensible first principles, since both belong equally to the created intellect. In addition, influenced by the growing emphasis on the individual, Aquinas claimed that, while the existence of truth in general is self-evident, the existence of a Primal Truth is not evident to us.19 My aim is not to set the two in opposition to each other, but to suggest that nothing is to be gained by refusing to acknowledge the differences between them because by refusing to acknowledge the differences between them because both can be seen as aiming at faith seeking understanding. Potter, in fact, points out a most significant point of divergence in citing my distinction between intelligibility and demonstration; the ontological way seeks the first, and the cosmological the second. The way of 19. It needs to be emphasized repeatedly that if the term "exist" is taken to mean occupancy in a spatio-temporal systemwhat Peirce called "secondness" or action and reaction between objectsthe term should not be used for God. Peirce saw this and insisted on the term "reality" instead; Tillich and others have made the same point. As Maritain pointed out, if "exist" is made to serve as the blanket term for all the kinds of things there are, it will have to be interpreted through a spectrum of meanings and not as if it had a univocal sense.

Page i Reason, Experience, and God

Page ii AMERICAN PHILOSOPHY SERIES 1. Peirce and Contemporary Thought: Philosophical Inquiries, edited by Kenneth Laine Ketner 2. Classic American Philosophers, edited by Max H. Fisch; introduction by Nathan Houser 3. John E. Smith, Experience and God 4. Vincent G. Potter, Peirce's Philosophical Perspectives, edited by Vincent M. Colapietro 5. Philosophy in Experience: American Philosophy in Transition, edited by Richard E. Hart and Douglas R. Anderson 6. Vincent G. Potter, Charles S. Peirce: On Norms and Ideals, introduction by Stanley M. Harrison

Page iii Reason, Experience, And God: John E. Smith In Dialogue Edited by Vincent M. Colapietro Fordham University Press New York 1997

Page iv Copyright 1997 FORDHAM UNIVERSITY PRESS All rights reserved. LC 97-8014 ISBN 0-8232-1706-x (hardcover) ISBN 0-8232-1707-8 (paperback) ISSN 1073-2764 American Philosophy Series, No. 7 Vincent M. Colapietro, Editor Vincent G. Potter (1929-1994), Founding Editor Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Reason, experience, and God: John E. Smith in dialogue / edited by Vincent M. Colapietro. p. cm. (American philosophy series, ISSN 1073-2764; no. 7) Essays presented at a conference in honor of John E. Smith, Fordham University, Dec. 13, 1993. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-8232-1706-X (hardcover : alk. paper). ISBN 0-8232-1707-8 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Smith, John EdwinCongresses. I. Colapietro, Vincent Michael, 1950- II. Series. B945.S7144R431997 191dc2197-8014 CIP Printed in the United States of America

Page v This book is dedicated to the memory of Vincent G. Potter (1929-1994). He followed the Light that guides the quest for Truth: "In lumine tuo videbimus lumen."

Page vii Contents

Next page

1234567...57

Light

Font size:

↓

↑

Georgia Tahoma Arial Verdana

Reset

Interval:

↓

↑

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Reason, experience, and God: John E. Smith in dialogue»

Look at similar books to Reason, experience, and God: John E. Smith in dialogue. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.

William Sweet

Migrating Texts and Traditions

Scott F. Aikin

Pragmatism, Pluralism, and the Nature of Philosophy

Robert M. Wallace

Philosophical Mysticism in Plato, Hegel, and the Present

Robert B. Pippin

Hegel’s Realm of Shadows: Logic as Metaphysics in “The Science of Logic”

Bernstein Richard J

The Pragmatic Turn

John Llewellyn

The HypoCritical Imagination: Between Kant and Levinas

Simone Bignall

Deleuze and Pragmatism

John Smith

Experience and God

Stanley J. Scott

Frontiers of Consciousness: Interdisciplinary Studies in American Philosophy and Poetry

Stephen Tyman

Descrying the ideal: the philosophy of John William Miller

Vincent Potter

Doctrine and Experience: Essays in American Philosophy

Robert L. Perkins

History and System: Hegel’s Philosophy of History

Discussion, reviews of the book Reason, experience, and God: John E. Smith in dialogue and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.