• Complain

Matthew Levering - Was the Reformation a Mistake?: Why Catholic Doctrine Is Not Unbiblical

Here you can read online Matthew Levering - Was the Reformation a Mistake?: Why Catholic Doctrine Is Not Unbiblical full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2017, publisher: Zondervan Academic, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Matthew Levering Was the Reformation a Mistake?: Why Catholic Doctrine Is Not Unbiblical
  • Book:
    Was the Reformation a Mistake?: Why Catholic Doctrine Is Not Unbiblical
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Zondervan Academic
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2017
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Was the Reformation a Mistake?: Why Catholic Doctrine Is Not Unbiblical: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Was the Reformation a Mistake?: Why Catholic Doctrine Is Not Unbiblical" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Was the Reformation a mistake?
In its actual historical context, it hardly seems fair to call the Reformation a mistake. In 1517, the Church was in need of a spiritual and theological reform. The issues raised by Renaissance humanism - and by the profound corruption of the Churchs leaders, the Avignon papacy, and the Great Schism in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries - lingered unresolved. What were key theological problems that led to the Reformation?
Theologian Matthew Levering helps readers see these questions from a Catholic perspective. Surveying nine key themes - Scripture, Mary, the Eucharist, the Seven Sacraments, monasticism, justification and merit, purgatory, saints, and papacy - he examines the positions of Martin Luther and makes a case that the Catholic position is biblically defensible once one allows for the variety of biblically warranted modes of interpreting Scripture. At the same time, Levering makes clear that he cannot prove the Catholic case.
The book concludes with a spirited response by mere Protestant theologian Kevin J. Vanhoozer.

Matthew Levering: author's other books


Who wrote Was the Reformation a Mistake?: Why Catholic Doctrine Is Not Unbiblical? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Was the Reformation a Mistake?: Why Catholic Doctrine Is Not Unbiblical — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Was the Reformation a Mistake?: Why Catholic Doctrine Is Not Unbiblical" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Was the Reformation a Mistake Why Catholic Doctrine Is Not Unbiblical - image 1
Was the Reformation a Mistake Why Catholic Doctrine Is Not Unbiblical - image 2

ZONDERVAN

Was the Reformation a Mistake?

Copyright 2017 by Matthew Levering and Kevin J. Vanhoozer

Requests for information should be addressed to:

Zondervan, 3900 Sparks Dr. SE, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49546

ePub Edition August 2017: ISBN 978-0-310-53072-5

Unless otherwise noted, the Scripture quotations of Matthew Levering are taken from The Catholic Edition of the Revised Standard Version of the Bible. Copyright 1965, 1966 National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

Unless otherwise noted, the Scripture quotations of Kevin J. Vanhoozer are taken from the ESV Bible (The Holy Bible, English Standard Version). Copyright 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

The Scripture quotations marked NRSV are taken from the New Revised Standard Version Bible. Copyright 1989 National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

Any Internet addresses (websites, blogs, etc.) and telephone numbers in this book are offered as a resource. They are not intended in any way to be or imply an endorsement by Zondervan, nor does Zondervan vouch for the content of these sites and numbers for the life of this book.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any meanselectronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any otherexcept for brief quotations in printed reviews, without the prior permission of the publisher.

Cover design: Darren Welch Design

Cover image: shutterstock.com

Interior design: Kait Lamphere

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 /DHV/ 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

To J. Todd Billings

Information about External Hyperlinks in this ebook

Please note that footnotes in this ebook may contain hyperlinks to external websites as part of bibliographic citations. These hyperlinks have not been activated by the publisher, who cannot verify the accuracy of these links beyond the date of publication.

CONTENTS

by Kevin J. Vanhoozer

I am grateful to Katya Covrett of Zondervan for the invitation to write this book. In commemoration of the Reformation, she and her colleagues came up with the topic and title, persuaded my eminent friend Kevin Vanhoozer to write an evangelical response within the book, and made it possible for me to undertake the task. Let me thank Kevin, my neighbor in Libertyville, Illinois, for bringing his characteristically brilliant intelligence, wit, and grace to his portion of the book. Writing a short book (the requested length of my portion was sixty thousand words) on a wide range of dense and complex five-hundred-year-old intractable Christian controversies poses personal and professional risks. I agreed to write such a book, however, because I wanted to attend to the five-hundredth anniversary of the Reformation in a way that would show appreciation for the love of the Word of God that has been manifested to me by numerous Protestant friends and colleagues.

The generosity and collegiality shown to me by evangelical theologians in the Chicago area since I moved here in 2013 has been a tremendous consolation and gift. Without being able to be in any way comprehensive, let me mention here the support and encouragement given me by Jack Bates, Chris Smith, Craig Hefner, Ty Kieser, Daniel Hill, Jon Laansma, Nicholas Perrin, Marc Cortez, Jeff Barbeau, Beth Jones, Dan Treier, Keith Johnson, Greg Lee, Matthew Milliner, and George Kalantzis (all of Wheaton College), and also by Tom McCall, John Woodbridge, David Luy, Alex Pierce, David Moser, Lisa Sung, Doug Sweeney, Kevin Vanhoozer, and Geoffrey Fulkerson (all of Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, with the exception of David Moser who is now a doctoral candidate at Southern Methodist University). My Libertyville neighbor Scot McKnight reached out to me early on, and I am grateful for our lunches together and for his inspiring love of the gospel. Joel Willitts of North Park University graciously invited me to give a presentation on theological interpretation of Scripture to his class. Among the many evangelical theologians outside the Chicago area to whom I owe a significant debtfar too many to name herelet me mention just a few: Timothy George, Hans Boersma, Peter Leithart, Chad Raith, Dave Nelson, Michael Allen, Ryan Peterson, and Adam Johnson. None of the above, of course, bears responsibility for my positions in this book.

At Mundelein Seminary, my estimable dean, Fr. Thomas Baima, has long been at the center of Chicago-area and international ecumenical dialogues; he has my gratitude for all that he does for the seminary and for the church. I could not have undertaken this work without his support and that of Mundelein Seminarys rector, Fr. John Kartje, or without the generosity of James and Mary Perry, who, among their numerous works of love, endowed the Chair of Theology that I hold. To my extraordinary wife, Joy Levering, thank you for the blessings that you bear to all with whom you interact, and for all your gifts to me and to our treasured children. Joy, you have ravished my heart (Song 4:9); may God care for you and bless you everlastingly. I also wish to thank my beloved mother and father, who are committed Quakers, and my beloved brother Brooks and sister-in-law Heather, who are evangelical Christians.

During his tenure at Mundelein Seminary as the 20152016 Paluch Chair, Reinhard Htter helped me to think about how to structure this book and gave excellent counsel. R. J. Matava read parts of an early version and offered trenchant criticism. David Luy assisted me tremendously in filling lacunae in the Luther sections and in helping me clarify the strictly limited purpose of these sections. David raised valuable questions about ways in which these sections might be misread, and I have worked to guard against such misunderstandings. Alex Pierce read the whole manuscript twice and saved me from a wide array of theological and textual infelicities. Jared Ortiz organized a reading group that read the introduction and four chapters of the manuscript, and that challenged me on numerous points and improved the final form of the manuscript greatly. The members of this reading group included Jareds Hope College colleagues Jonathan Hagood and Jack Mulder, as well as Len Baremen, Linda Baremen, Benjamin Currie, and Michael Page. Tremendous thanks to all of these generous souls. My son Andrew will be a freshman at Hope College this fall.

Let me dedicate this book to a Christian scholar and friend who has a heart for the gospel and a marvelous patience, generosity, gentleness, and brilliance: Todd Billings. We have shared many enriching times together at conferences, wonderful car rides (especially in Dallas-area ice storms!), and many a good meal. In his writings and in his person, Todd embodies the psalmists teaching, The fear of the L ORD is the beginning of wisdom (Ps 111:10).

W hen I think of the Reformation, I think first of Protestant relatives, friends, and scholars who have contributed so much to my life and theological work. Insofar as we remain ecclesially and doctrinally divided, this is tragic and not in accord with Jesuss will for his disciples that they may all be one (John 17:21). Nonetheless, I cannot think of the Reformation merely in terms of tragic division because of all the wonderful insights and inspiring models of life that I have gained from Protestant Christians and from great Protestant thinkers of the past and present.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Was the Reformation a Mistake?: Why Catholic Doctrine Is Not Unbiblical»

Look at similar books to Was the Reformation a Mistake?: Why Catholic Doctrine Is Not Unbiblical. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Was the Reformation a Mistake?: Why Catholic Doctrine Is Not Unbiblical»

Discussion, reviews of the book Was the Reformation a Mistake?: Why Catholic Doctrine Is Not Unbiblical and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.