David Livingstone - Black Terror White Soldiers: Islam, Fascism & the New Age

Black Terror, White Soldiers

Islam, Fascism & the New Age

All Rights Reserved 2013 by David Livingstone

No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or by any information storage retrieval system, without the written permission of the publisher.

Sabilillah Publications

ISBN-13: 978-1481226509

Printed in the United States of America

Its a mystery wrapped in a riddle inside an enigma!

David Ferrie, played by Joe Pesci in Oliver Stones JFK

Table of Contents

1. Shariah

2. Black Magic & Ancient Mysteries

3. The Sufis

4. The Holy Grail

5. Ibn Taymiyyah & the Qadiriyya

6. Renaissance & Reformation

7. The Year 1666

8. The Illuminati

9. The Wahhabis

10. Shambhala and Agartha

11. The Salafis

12. Synarchism, Nihilism & Terrorism

13. World War One

14. Modernism & the Avant-Garde

15. The Protocols of Zion

16. Nazism: The Blond Beast

17. The Fourth Reich

18. United Europe

19. Mad Scientists, Propaganda & Covert War

20. The UFO Phenomenon

21. Jihad & the New Left

22. Fascist International

23. Sex, Drugs & Revolution

24. Neoliberalism

25. Esalen, the CIA & Ancient Aliens

26. The Seventies

27. Operation Gladio

28. The Christian Right

29. The New Great Game

30. Petrodollar Islam

31. The Clash of Civilizations

32. Pan-Turkism & the Neo-Caliphate

33. The New Age

34. Islam & Democracy

35. Conspiracy Theory

Endnotes

1. Shariah

With the collapse of the Cold War, the hidden manipulators of Western governments have selected a new specter: Islam. Presented as a Clash of Civilization, we are told that Western Humanism, which includes notions of secular democracy and human rights, represents the fulfillment of thousands of years of human intellectual progress, or the end of history. However, the full adoption of Humanistic values by the rest of the world is supposedly impeded by the Islamic fundamentalists who hold on stubbornly to the anachronistic idea of theocracy. To instill the necessary fear of the barbarism exemplified by the intrusion of religion into politics, we are supplied with a steady stream of abhorrent examples of Islamic Shariah, which are seen to contravene the most basic modern sensibilities.

Islam should represent a potent antidote to the ills fueling the moral deterioration of the world, and the progressive enslavement of the have-nots by the have-mores. Islam belongs to the same tradition as the Jews and Christians, and claims to represent the same message originally taught by the successive prophets, beginning with Adam, and including among others, Abraham, David, Solomon, Jesus and finally Mohammed. Like the traditions that preceded it, Islam enshrines the Golden Rule : to do unto others as you would they unto you." This dictum is the basis for human equality, and should impel every human being to seek to protect the safety, well-being and justice of others.

However, like Judaism and Christianity, Islam has become corrupted by losing sight of this simple principle, becoming muddled in obsessions over doctrinal controversies, and a kind of religious nationalism that takes the form of self-righteous indignation towards unbelievers, undermining the universal message and appeal of Islam. Ultimately, Islam has become blighted by the advent of fundamentalism, which has provided the ugly face that has marred the reputation of the religion, leading to a sharp decline in favorable attitudes towards it. Islamic fundamentalism, however, is a misleading term, because every Muslim must believe in the fundamentals of the faith. Rather, fundamentalism is a word misappropriated from a characterization of Christians who refuse to adapt their beliefs to modern values. While fundamentalism is not an entirely appropriate term to apply to Islam, it nevertheless refers to a type of fanaticism found among recent movements, which tend to literalism, chauvinism, and often extremism. In effect, Muslims who subscribe to the fundamental tenets of their religion are castigated as fundamentalists, and equated with these extremists.

This is not an accident. Certainly, the Muslims are largely at fault for this corruption, but they were heavily assisted by the British policy of Divide and Conquer over the last few hundred years, followed up by the Americans, who deliberately created and nurtured the rise of Islamic fanaticism. These egregious examples are conveniently exploited to provide a stark contrast to what is supposed to be the more favorable Western value system. Paradoxically, however, these new modern values of the West were developed to overcome what was perceived to be the dogmatism of religionChristianity in particularbut have come to represent a new dogmatism. Ultimately, the notion of human rights is a legacy of the anti-religious sentiments of the eighteenth century Enlightenment, which sought to develop a set of moral tenets without recourse to a religion or scripture. In other words, moral values that could be achieved through reason, and accepted by all as inalienable and self-evident. Thus, because all who are rational are supposed to arrive at the same conclusions, those who disagree are derided as irrational.

The dogmatic acceptance of the universality of these rights is further buttressed by the perception of the inevitable progress of mankind. In other words, since mankind is evolving intellectually, just as it evolves physically, the development of human rights is to be taken as the fulfillment of the evolution of humanity. However, because they have deliberately been made ignorant of the general outlines of history, Western citizens are fooled into confusing their own particular experience with the history of humanity as a whole. As George Orwell said, Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past. Therefore, control of a societys perception of history is crucial to modern methods of propaganda.

According to the Humanistic interpretation, therefore, history began in Greecethe cradle of Western Civilizationwhere the Greek philosophers were the first to question religion. This secularizing tradition progressed through to the Renaissance and the Enlightenment, and culminated with the French and American Revolutions and the separation of Church and State and the notion of human rights. All who refuse to accept that these Western rights are the fruition of centuries of human progress are deemed opposed to the progress of mankind itself. Thus, Western citizens concede to their governments imposing these same rights on the rest of the world. It is a new White Mans Burden, where once European societies made the pretense of civilizing other peoples, they now disguise their imperialist aggression as the spread of democracy. Today, the so-called savages all those who resist the acceptance of the Western value system. Particularly, the obstinate commitment of Muslim fundamentalists to the creation of theocratic states is presented as an anachronism, where their supposed resistance to the democratizing project of the West is seen as ultimately pitting it against the East, in what constitutes a Clash of Civilizations.

However, it is not possible to impose a single value system to be accepted universally. To recognize that others will arrive at different conclusions about what is right and wrong is the very basis of tolerance. So while modern secular Humanism claims to be a solution to the dogmatism that was characteristic of the Churchs persecution of heretics, modern Western societies have become victims, through their own arrogance, of what is known as the Tolerance Paradox, where they have become intolerant of those they deem intolerant.