• Complain

Merleau-Ponty Maurice - The Intercorporeal Self: Merleau-Ponty on Subjectivity

Here you can read online Merleau-Ponty Maurice - The Intercorporeal Self: Merleau-Ponty on Subjectivity full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Albany, year: 2012, publisher: State University of New York Press, genre: Religion. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Merleau-Ponty Maurice The Intercorporeal Self: Merleau-Ponty on Subjectivity

The Intercorporeal Self: Merleau-Ponty on Subjectivity: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "The Intercorporeal Self: Merleau-Ponty on Subjectivity" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

An original interpretation of Merleau-Ponty on subjectivity, drawing from and challenging both the continental and analytic traditions. Challenging a prevalent Western idea of the self as a discrete, interior consciousness, Scott L. Marratto argues instead that subjectivity is a characteristic of the living, expressive movement establishing a dynamic intertwining between a sentient body and its environment. He draws on the work of the French philosopher Maurice Merleau-Ponty, contemporary European philosophy, and research in cognitive science and development to offer a compelling investigation into what it means to be a self. The Intercorporeal Self amounts to a kind of dialectic between Merleau-Pontys thought and naturalism as it functions within contemporary analytic thought and deconstruction as it appears in Derridas thought. Marratto constructs argumentation that shows that Merleau-Pontys thought cannot be reduced to naturalism and that it does not fall prey to the deconstructive critique. Consequently, Marratto, better than anyone else, shows the contribution that Merleau-Ponty makes to contemporary philosophy.This is an important book. I would even venture to say that it is a genuine work of philosophy. Leonard Lawlor, Sparks Professor of Philosophy, Penn State University Marratto brings Merleau-Pontys phenomenology into a mutually transformative dialogue with the latest trends in the embodied sciences of the mind. His book puts side by side notions of intercorporeality, habit, style, and auto-affection with Gestalt, ecological, sensorimotor, and enactive perspectives on perception and subjectivity. Marratto weaves together the threads of conceptual traditions that saw themselves as incompatible not so long ago. A significant contribution to current efforts toward reconceptualizing the lived body as the matrix of significance and expressive being-in-the-world, and subjectivity as self-affecting, self-initiated movement and intercorporeal attunement to the demands of other bodies. Ezequiel A. Di Paolo, coeditor of Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science Scott L. Marratto is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Michigan Technological University and the coauthor (with Lawrence E. Schmidt) of The End of Ethics in a Technological Society

Merleau-Ponty Maurice: author's other books


Who wrote The Intercorporeal Self: Merleau-Ponty on Subjectivity? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

The Intercorporeal Self: Merleau-Ponty on Subjectivity — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "The Intercorporeal Self: Merleau-Ponty on Subjectivity" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

A VOLUME IN THE SUNY SERIES IN CONTEMPORARY FRENCH THOUGHT

The Intercorporeal Self Merleau-Ponty on Subjectivity - image 1

David Pettigrew and Francois Raffoul, editors

THE INTERCORPOREAL SELF

Merleau-Ponty on Subjectivity

SCOTT L. MARRATTO

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK PRESS

Published by
STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK PRESS, ALBANY

2012 State University of New York

All rights reserved

Printed in the United States of America

No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission. No part of this book may be stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means including electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission in writing of the publisher.

For information, contact
State University of New York Press, Albany, NY
www.sunypress.edu

Production, Kelli W. LeRoux
Marketing, Anne M. Valentine

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Marratto, Scott L. (Scott Louis), 1968

The intercorporeal self : Merleau-Ponty on subjectivity / Scott L. Marratto.

p. cm.

Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index.

ISBN 978-1-4384-4231-0 (hardcover : alk. paper)

1. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, 19081961. 2. Subjectivity. I. Title.

B2430.M3764M373 2012

194dc23

2011027049

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

In memory of my mother, Melody McLoughlin

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

In Phenomenology of Perception Maurice Merleau-Ponty remarks on the strange - photo 2

In Phenomenology of Perception, Maurice Merleau-Ponty remarks on the strange manner in which we discover, in a kind of unending process, the patterns of our own thinking only by letting it find its expression in the context of our relations with others. He writes, There is a taking up of others' thought through speech, a reflection in others, an ability to think according to others which enriches our own thoughts (PhP, 179/208). The process of writing a book, which is inevitably a reflection of many conversations, collaborations, helpful comments, criticisms, and suggestions, is particularly exemplary of this philosophical insight.

There are a great many people to whom acknowledgment is due, and any list is sure to be incomplete. I would like to express my particular gratitude to John Russon, who has been an inspiring and challenging teacher, mentor, and friend to me. His comments and reflections on this manuscript have been crucial to its development. I am grateful for John's work as a gifted philosopher and teacher, and also for his efforts in organizing an ongoing philosophical conversation among a group of scholars who have been meeting, for a number of years now, a few days each summer, in Toronto. It has been my privilege to participate in a number of these Toronto Seminars to discuss the works of Merleau-Ponty, Derrida, Hegel, Heidegger, Plato, and Fichte. The list of participants in these conversations over the years includes mer Aygn, Don Beith, Noah Moss Brender, Susan Bredlau, David Ciavatta, Peter Costello, Bruce Gilbert, Jill Gilbert, Shannon Hoff, Kirsten Jacobson, Kym Maclaren, David Morris, Alexandra Morrison, Gregory Recco, and Maria Talero. These conversations have shaped my own approach to the practice of philosophy as well as my interpretation of Merleau-Ponty, and I am grateful to all of them.

My exploration of the relationship between Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology and Derrida's deconstruction, reflected in of this book, began in conversations with Andrew Bailey. His thoughtful approach to my questions and ideas stands, for me, as a model of open-minded philosophical dialogue.

Several people have offered detailed suggestions and comments on versions of the manuscript as a whole. Kirsten Jacobson's very insightful and helpful suggestions motivated and guided my attempts to clarify some key passages. I would also like to express my appreciation for the way in which her work effectively demonstrates the pertinence of Merleau-Ponty's analyses of embodiment and spatiality to a number of issues and debates in contemporary empirical research on child development, gender, mental health, and politics. I am grateful to Leonard Lawlor for his comments and encouragement as well as for his many excellent books and articles on Merleau-Ponty, Husserl, Derrida, and contemporary French philosophy. His work as an interpreter of the continental tradition and as a philosopher has made a deep impression on me, and I can only hope that this is reflected in the pages of this book. I am grateful to Kym Maclaren for her comments, questions, and suggestions on an earlier version of the manuscript as well as for her work as a phenomenologist and scholar of Merleau-Ponty. Her insights on expression, intersubjectivity, self-consciousness, and development have significantly informed my work on these issues. Thanks also to Jeff Mitscherling for his helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

I would also like to thank Jay Lampert and Graeme Nicholson for their work as extraordinarily gifted teachers and philosophers, as well as for their friendship and encouragement. Lawrence E. Schmidt and Bernard Hammond are two mentors and long-time friends whose approaches to the vocation of teacher and scholar give powerful expression to their abiding concerns for justice and the Good. I am deeply grateful for both of them.

I want to gratefully acknowledge the support of my family, especially my sisters, Laura Ogden and Tracy Fleet.

I acknowledge the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Department of Philosophy at the University of Guelph, and the University of King's College in Halifax with gratitude for their support of my research. I would also like to thank Andrew Kenyon and Kelli Williams-LeRoux at SUNY Press for guiding the process of bringing this work to publication.

Lastly, I would like to thank Alexandra Morrison. I am grateful for the joy of her companionship, her support and assistance and, most especially, for a rich philosophical conversation whose various strands weave their way through our daily life together.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

TEXTS BY MERLEAU-PONTY EM Eye and Mind Translated by Carleton Dallery In - photo 3

TEXTS BY MERLEAU-PONTY

EMEye and Mind. Translated by Carleton Dallery. In PrP. (L'Oeil et l'Esprit. Paris: Gallimard, 1964.)
NNature: Course Notes from the Collge de France. Translated by Robert Vallier. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2003. (La Nature: notes, cours du Collge de France. tabli et annot par Dominique Sglard. Paris: Seuil, 1995.)
PhPPhenomenology of Perception. Translated by Colin Smith. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962. (Phnomnologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard, 1964.)
PPOEIn Praise of Philosophy and Other Essays. Translated by John Wild and James M. Edie. Evanston, 1970. (loge de la philosophie. Paris: Gallimard, 1953; and Rsums de cours, Collge de France 19521960. Paris: Gallimard, 1968.)
PrPThe Primacy of Perception and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics. J.M. Edie, editor. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1964.
PWThe Prose of the World. Translated by John O'Neill. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973. (
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «The Intercorporeal Self: Merleau-Ponty on Subjectivity»

Look at similar books to The Intercorporeal Self: Merleau-Ponty on Subjectivity. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «The Intercorporeal Self: Merleau-Ponty on Subjectivity»

Discussion, reviews of the book The Intercorporeal Self: Merleau-Ponty on Subjectivity and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.