• Complain

Dadkhah - Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics

Here you can read online Dadkhah - Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Berlin;Heidelberg, year: 2011, publisher: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Dadkhah Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics
  • Book:
    Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2011
  • City:
    Berlin;Heidelberg
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Dadkhah: author's other books


Who wrote Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Part 1
Basic concepts and methods
Kamran Dadkhah Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics 10.1007/978-3-642-13748-8_1 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011
1. Mathematics, Computation, and Economics
Kamran Dadkhah 1
(1)
Department of Economics, Northeastern University, Boston, USA
Kamran Dadkhah
Email:
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
Abstract
Many believe that mathematics is one of the most beautiful creations of humankind, second only to music. The word creation , however, may be disputed. Have humans created something called mathematics? Then how is it that we increasingly discover that the world, and indeed the universe around us, obey one or another mathematical law? Perhaps to the faithful, the answer is clear: A higher power is the greatest mathematician of all. A worldly answer may be that humans discovered, rather than created, mathematics. Thus, wherever we look, we see mathematical laws at work. Whether humans created mathematics and it just so happened that the world seems to be mathematical, or the universe is a giant math problem and human beings are discovering it, we cannot deny that mathematics is extremely useful in every branch of science and technology, and even in everyday life. Without math, most likely we would be still living in caves. But what is mathematics? And why are so many afraid of it?
1.1 Mathematics
Many believe that mathematics is one of the most beautiful creations of humankind, second only to music. The word creation , however, may be disputed. Have humans created something called mathematics? Then how is it that we increasingly discover that the world, and indeed the universe around us, obey one or another mathematical law? Perhaps to the faithful, the answer is clear: A higher power is the greatest mathematician of all. A worldly answer may be that humans discovered, rather than created, mathematics. Thus, wherever we look, we see mathematical laws at work. Whether humans created mathematics and it just so happened that the world seems to be mathematical, or the universe is a giant math problem and human beings are discovering it, we cannot deny that mathematics is extremely useful in every branch of science and technology, and even in everyday life. Without math, most likely we would be still living in caves. But what is mathematics? And why are so many afraid of it?
To begin with, for the greatest part mathematics is nothing but logical thinking. Indeed, mathematics consists of three parts: definitions , logical thinking , and axioms . We will take up each of these parts in turn, but lets clear up one confusion right away: What about all those dreaded Greek and other strange symbols? First, we use Greek symbols because Greeks started the systematic study of mathematics and some reward must accrue to pioneers. Second, the Greek alphabet and symbols simply serve as a shorthand that makes understanding mathematics easier. If you dont believe this, consider how one of the great mathematicians of the Middle Ages, Omar Khayyam, explained the solution of a quadratic equation.
The second species. A square and a number equal a root . It is necessary in this class that the number should not be greater than the square of half the number of roots, otherwise the problem would be impossible to solve. If the number is equal to the square of half the root-number, then half the root-number is equal to the root of the square. If the number is less than the square of half the root, subtract it from the square of half the roots and extract the square root of the remainder, adding the result to half the roots or subtracting it from the latter. The sum, in case of addition, or the remainder, in case of subtraction, is the root of the square. The arithmetical proof of this theorem is known when its geometrical demonstration is known.
Translation, please! Put more clearly, the question is finding the solution of a quadratic equation of the form
Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics - image 1
The solution to this equation, which we shall discuss in , is
Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics - image 2
Khayyam argues that the equation does not have a solution if Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics - image 3 or Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics - image 4 because this would result in a complex number and at the time complex numbers were not known. But if Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics - image 5 then Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics - image 6 and if Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics - image 7 then the solutions are
Thus Khayyam had correctly solved the problem yet a modern reader would have - photo 8
Thus, Khayyam had correctly solved the problem, yet a modern reader would have difficulty understanding it. Nevertheless, if you think that 1000 years after Khayyam you can do better, then please write down a description of the problem and its solution in plain English. Clarity and economy require the use of symbols and conventions.
One other important lesson from the above quotation is that mathematics and symbols are two different things. Khayyam was doing mathematics; the fact that he did not use symbols made no difference. Symbols cannot make a banal statement about mathematics, and not using symbols cannot detract from the essence of a mathematical argument.
Going back to our discussion, the necessity of definitions should be clear. If we are to have a logical discussion, we should all speak the same language. In other words, an expression or statement should mean the same thing to all of us. A mathematical definition should be such that, in no uncertain terms, it includes all of the items that conform to the definition and excludes all that do not. In this matter, mathematicians are a bit obsessive-compulsive. They go to great lengths to make sure we are speaking about the same items and situations. But there are exceptions. In every branch of mathematics, a number of concepts are deemed too fundamental or basic to be defined. For example, in geometry, concepts such as point and line are at best vaguely defined. We assume that all are well aware of what we are talking about. The same is true about the concept of a set in set theory and a random event in probability theory. The rationale should be clear. Every concept has to be defined in terms of some other concept or object. We cannot start from nothing and expect to create a host of meaningful definitions. We may end up trying to define the meaning of the word word .
By far the largest part of mathematics is logical thinking, that is, starting with assumptions and deriving implications from them. In mathematics, every statement flows logically from another. As such, you do not get anything from math unless you have already put it in. It is like the work of a magician, who pulls a rabbit out of the hat as if it materialized out of thin air. But the rabbit was there all along, except that the audience could not see itperhaps because of distraction or you did not pay enough attention to see something that was in full view. Of course, let us not forget the skill of the magician. Not everyone can perform a magic trick like Houdini or Siegfreid and Roy.
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics»

Look at similar books to Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics»

Discussion, reviews of the book Foundations of Mathematical and Computational Economics and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.