• Complain

Läszló Bartosiewicz - Shuffling nags, lame ducks: the archaeology of animal disease

Here you can read online Läszló Bartosiewicz - Shuffling nags, lame ducks: the archaeology of animal disease full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. City: Oxford, year: 2013, publisher: Oxbow Books Ltd;Oxbow Books;Oakville, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Läszló Bartosiewicz Shuffling nags, lame ducks: the archaeology of animal disease

Shuffling nags, lame ducks: the archaeology of animal disease: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Shuffling nags, lame ducks: the archaeology of animal disease" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Cover; Title Page; Copyright; Contents; Acknowledgments and photo credits; Chapter 1: Foreword; Chapter 2: Introduction; Chapter 3: Basic concepts; Chapter 4: History of studying pathological animal remains; Chapter 5: Differences between human and animal palaeopathology; 5.1 Divergent research traditions; 5.2 Differences in objectives; 5.3 Differences between selection pressures on human and animal populations; 5.4 Specifics of skeletal morphology and function; 5.5 Differences in archaeological deposition; 5.6 Fragmentation, fossil diagenesis and bone preservation; 5.7 Pseudopathologies.;The analysis of animal bone assemblages from archaeological sites provides much valuable data concerning economic and husbandry practices in the past, as well as insights into cultural and symbolic or ritual activity. Animal palaeopathology can identify diseases in archaeozoological assemblages but little interest has been expressed in investigating and understanding the cultural aspects of the diseases identified. Such assemblages represent the cumulative effects of human attitudes, decisions and influences regarding the keeping, care, treatment, neglect and exploitation of animals which resu.

Läszló Bartosiewicz: author's other books


Who wrote Shuffling nags, lame ducks: the archaeology of animal disease? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Shuffling nags, lame ducks: the archaeology of animal disease — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Shuffling nags, lame ducks: the archaeology of animal disease" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Published by
Oxbow Books, Oxford, UK

Oxbow Books and the individual authors, 2013

Paperback ISBN 978-1-78297-189-4
E-pub ISBN 978-1-78297-194-8; Mobi ISBN 978-1-78297-195-5;
PDF ISBN 978-1-78297-196-2

This book is available direct from

Oxbow Books, Oxford, UK
(Phone: 01865-241249; Fax: 01865-794449)

and

The David Brown Book Company
PO Box 511, Oakville, CT 06779, USA
(Phone: 860-945-9329; Fax: 860-945-9468)

or from our website
www.oxbowbooks.com

A CIP record is available for this book from the British Library

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Bartosiewicz, L.
Shuffling nags, lame ducks : the archaeology of animal disease / Lszl Bartosiewicz ; with a
contribution on avian palaeopathology by Erika Gl.
pages cm
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-78297-189-4
1. Animal remains (Archaeology) 2. Animals--Diseases. I. Gl, Erika. II. Title.
CC79.5.A5B374 2013
930.1--dc23

2013033096

Cover Ian Hughes, www.mousematdesign.com.

Printed in Great Britain by
Short Run Press, Exeter

Contents

Acknowledgements and photo credits

Studying animal diseases in the past on the basis of archaeological evidence alone has been a complex task. Producing this book would have been impossible without substantial help by a number of people. Initiative by the late Sndor Bknyi must be acknowledged for compiling a core of data on pathological finds that have recently been substantially expanded by fellow archaeozoologists and archaeologists in Hungary who generously released information for analysis and publication. They include (in alphabetical order) Anna Zsfia Biller, Clive Bonsall (UK), Alice M. Choyke, Pter Csippn, Lszl Darczi-Szab, Mrta Darczi-Szab, gnes Kirly, Zsfia Eszter Kovcs, Andrea Krsi, Kyra Ljubljanovics, Fabiana Martin (Argentina), va Nyerges, Gbor Szrnyi, Darren Tanke (USA), Beta Tugya and Ivan Turk (Slovenia). Grateful thanks are due to Alice M. Choyke for having corrected the English version of the manuscript and Krisztin Kolozsvri who helped with the technical edition of photographs. Mihly Gasparik is thanked for providing access to the bird bone collection housed in the Department of Geology and Palaeontolgy of the Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, as well as Andrea Krsi for help in the Hungarian Agricultural Museum, Budapest. We are indebted to Pter Stonyi and Rbert Bozi, veterinarians, for their expert opinion on several excavated specimens.

The topic of this book is complex. Lengthy descriptions would be incomprehensible without the illustrations provided by several individuals and organizations whose initials will appear in figure captions throughout the book: Attila Arany Tth (AAT) and the late Bla Zsadon (BZs) prepared radiographs. Anna Zsfia Biller (AZsB) contributed both photographs and drawings. Additional photographs were taken by Marcel Balogh (MB), Clive Bonsall (UK), Alice M. Choyke (AMC), Ferenc Csecsetka (FCs), Pter Csippn (PCs), Lszl Darczi-Szab (LDSz), Mrta Darczi-Szab (MDSz), Erika Gl (EG), Julia Gerken (JG), rpd Gereffy (G), Jnos Gyarmati (JGy), Istvn Konyhs (IK), Istvn Kovts (IKo), Kroly Kozma (KK), Kyra Lyublyanovics (KL), Fabiana Martin (FM), Pia Nielsen (PN), Krisztina Plfay (KP), Joris Peters (JP), Aleks Pluskowski (AP), David L. O. Smith (DOLS), Lszl Susits (LS), Gbor Szllsy (GSz), Diana-Maria Sztancs (DMS), Dina Tasi (DT), Tibor Tth (TT), Zsuzsanna Tth (ZsT), Beta Tugya (BT) and Ivan Turk (IT). Their indispensable help is gratefully acknowledged here.

Institutional help was received through Csand Blint, director of the Archaeological Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (HAS), who kindly released numerous photographs for publication. Richard H. Meadow, director of the Zooarchaeology Laboratory, Peabody Museum, Harvard University (PMHU) gave permission to republish the image of horse vertebrae from Kurru, Sudan. Special thanks are due to Soraida Salwala, founder of the organization Friends of the Asian Elephant (FAE) and Istvn Konyhs (IK) of the Hungarian Bird Hospital Foundation and the agency Fot gynksg (www.Fotougynokseg.com) who contributed special pictures on animal welfare to this book. Additional pictures were provided by Agenca Efe (EFE), Bildagentur fr Kunst, Kultur und Geschichte, Berlin (BPK), Det Kongelige Bibliotek, Kbenhavn (KB) and Solent News and Photo Agency (SOLENT).

During 20042006 research included in this book was funded by Grant T047228 of the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA) titled Anatomical and pathological investigations on the skeleton of domestic animals: the use of recent observations in the interpretation of archaeological finds.

1. Foreword

Some 10,000 years ago, a handful of animal species were first incorporated within the human habitat on a permanent basis. Their reproduction and well-being became directly dependent on their keepers. As domestication progressed, physical proximity became a mutual source of infectious disease and traumatic injuries for humans and animals alike. New zoonoses developed, diseases and infections which are naturally transmitted between vertebrate animals and man (Shakespeare 2002, 1). An evident example of such diseases is rabies, known to spread through dog bites to other animals and humans. This disease was described as early as the 13th century by, among others, Albertus Magnus (Walker-Meikle 2012, 47). The written record provides accounts of other epidemics threatening livestock as well as humans. A dramatic woodcut in the 1532 German edition of Francesco Petrarchs 1492 De remediis utriusque fortunae (Medicine Against Both Fortunes II) shows a tumultuous plague scene in which victims not only include people, but also a horse, a dog, a cat, a rooster, and even a perching bird ().

Figure 1 Plague scene in the 1532 German edition of Petrarchs book Figure - photo 1

Figure 1. Plague scene in the 1532 German edition of Petrarchs book

Figure 2 Stray pig scavenging on an urban dump near Agra India It is - photo 2

Figure 2. Stray pig scavenging on an urban dump near Agra, India

It is however, not only epidemics, usually elusive from an archaeological point of view, that have emerged as people and animals have co-existed. In addition to physical closeness, modes of animal keeping and exploitation have continuously resulted in non-infectious diseases whose treatment or neglect can be recognized on the skeleton of ancient animals. Such phenomena not only reflect the health condition of livestock, but are characteristic of cultural attitudes towards animals. The slogan attributed to the 1904 Nobel Prize laureate Ivan Petrovich Pavlov: Doctors treat people, veterinarians humanity, is as relevant in our modern society as has been the special attention devoted to emotionally significant and/or valuable animals in the past.

Traditional animal palaeopathology was rooted in palaeontology, with little or no interest in the cultural aspects of animal disease. Animal remains recovered from archaeological deposits, however, are bona fide archaeological artefacts: they represent the cumulative effects of human decisions that in man-made domesticates include choices made during an animals life including selective breeding and the treatment of disease. Implicit to the concept of this book is, therefore, the hypothesis that most pathological deformations in archaeozoological specimens were brought about by conscious or inadvertent human influence.

Wild animals appear at first glance rather peripheral to the archaeological study of animal disease. Once domestic animals appeared they provided the majority of meat for their human keepers and thus soon became the dominant component in archaeological bone assemblages. The statistical probability of finding odd pathological specimens among the few wild animal remains therefore radically decreased. In addition, aside from hunting injuries, only a relatively limited range of diseases affect the skeletons of game: natural selection rarely allowed the development of chronic conditions seen in domestic animals. It is this contrast however, that offers a new perspective in the palaeopathological study of wild animal remains.

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Shuffling nags, lame ducks: the archaeology of animal disease»

Look at similar books to Shuffling nags, lame ducks: the archaeology of animal disease. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Shuffling nags, lame ducks: the archaeology of animal disease»

Discussion, reviews of the book Shuffling nags, lame ducks: the archaeology of animal disease and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.