• Complain

Rosemarie Zagarri - Revolutionary Backlash: Women and Politics in the Early American Republic

Here you can read online Rosemarie Zagarri - Revolutionary Backlash: Women and Politics in the Early American Republic full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. year: 2007, publisher: University of Pennsylvania Press, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

Rosemarie Zagarri Revolutionary Backlash: Women and Politics in the Early American Republic
  • Book:
    Revolutionary Backlash: Women and Politics in the Early American Republic
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    University of Pennsylvania Press
  • Genre:
  • Year:
    2007
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Revolutionary Backlash: Women and Politics in the Early American Republic: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Revolutionary Backlash: Women and Politics in the Early American Republic" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

The Seneca Falls Convention is typically seen as the beginning of the first womens rights movement in the United States. Revolutionary Backlash argues otherwise. According to Rosemarie Zagarri, the debate over womens rights began not in the decades prior to 1848 but during the American Revolution itself. Integrating the approaches of womens historians and political historians, this book explores changes in womens status that occurred from the time of the American Revolution until the election of Andrew Jackson.

Although the period after the Revolution produced no collective movement for womens rights, women built on precedents established during the Revolution and gained an informal foothold in party politics and male electoral activities. Federalists and Jeffersonians vied for womens allegiance and sought their support in times of national crisis. Women, in turn, attended rallies, organized political activities, and voiced their opinions on the issues of the day. After the publication of Mary Wollstonecrafts A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, a widespread debate about the nature of womens rights ensued. The state of New Jersey attempted a bold experiment: for a brief time, women there voted on the same terms as men.

Yet as Rosemarie Zagarri argues in Revolutionary Backlash, this opening for women soon closed. By 1828, womens politicization was seen more as a liability than as a strength, contributing to a divisive political climate that repeatedly brought the country to the brink of civil war. The increasing sophistication of party organizations and triumph of universal suffrage for white males marginalized those who could not vote, especially women. Yet all was not lost. Women had already begun to participate in charitable movements, benevolent societies, and social reform organizations. Through these organizations, women found another way to practice politics.

Rosemarie Zagarri: author's other books


Who wrote Revolutionary Backlash: Women and Politics in the Early American Republic? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Revolutionary Backlash: Women and Politics in the Early American Republic — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Revolutionary Backlash: Women and Politics in the Early American Republic" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Acknowledgments

Perhaps the best thingmaybe the only good thingabout taking a long time to write a book is the ever-enlarging circle of people who have helped me in one way or another and who, in a sense, formed a community centered around the book. Making new friends and getting to know other scholars in the field have been among the most rewarding aspects of the project. A long genesis also means that I have acquired a long list of debts which a simple thank you can hardly repay. In any case, I will try.

First of all, I would like to thank the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Society for Eighteenth Century Studies, the American Antiquarian Society (AAS), and George Mason University for providing fellowships or financial support that allowed me to research and write the book. I am especially grateful to Joanne Chaison, John Hench, and Phil Lampi at the AAS, who played key roles in the early stages of the project and have made their institution a delightful haven for scholars of early America. I would also like to thank Dave Kelley of the Library of Congress for reference assistance that went above and beyond the call of duty. Because most of the research for this book was finished before the widespread availability of digital databases and web search engines, I had to rely on more old-fashioned methods. More than ten years ago, Dave showed me an obscure index to the American Periodical Series, printed on microprint cards (if anyone remembers what those are), that opened up whole new avenues of inquiry.

Many other individuals aided my research in ways both large and small. I would like to thank the staffs at the Library of Congress Manuscript Room and Rare Book Room, the Massachusetts Historical Society, the New York Historical Society, the Houghton Library at Harvard University, the Maryland Historical Society, the Virginia Historical Society, and the Southern Collection at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, for help in uncovering the riches of their archives. I am grateful to the editors of the William & Mary Quarterly and the American Quarterly for giving me permission to reproduce portions of articles previously published in their journals. I would also like to acknowledge the assistance of my graduate students, Linda Burch, Pat Dunlap, Clayton Jewett, Stephanie Hurter, and Karen McPherson, who made useful contributions to my research. In addition, I thank Terry Ross, who provided timely advice of another sort that helped bring the project to fruition.

Many scholars have commented on papers related to this project or read sections of the work that appeared previously in article form. For useful comments and suggestions, I would like to thank Catherine Allgor, Doron Ben-Atar, Tim Breen, Pat Cohen, Seth Cotlar, Nancy Cott, Mary Kelley, Sarah Knott, Jan Lewis, Barbara Oberg, Peter Onuf, Jeff Pasley, Whit Ridgway, Andy Robertson, Barbara Taylor, David Waldstreicher, and Gordon Wood. I am especially grateful to Dan Richter, who read the entire manuscript and provided astute criticism that helped me sharpen and refine my argument. My editor at the University of Pennsylvania Press, Bob Lockhart, has been supportive and enthusiastic for as long as I have been working on the project. He has been the ideal person to shepherd the manuscript into print.

Sheila Skemp, Elaine Forman Crane, and Edie Gelles have been my intellectual companions throughout the entire journey. We have done so many conference sessions together that I am sure I don't know where my ideas end and theirs begin. They have read my papers, articles, and drafts and offered innumerable suggestions for improvement. I thank them for their intellectual generosity, their friendship, and their own significant contributions to the field of early American women's history.

The book has also benefited from discussions with other colleagues. My department at George Mason University has been a most congenial and dynamic place for a historian to work. Jack Censer, Jane Turner Censer, Marion Deshmukh, the late Larry Levine, Mike O'Malley, Roy Rosenzweig, Suzy Smith, and Jeffrey Stewart have all provided help, insight, or encouragement at key moments. I also thank Paula Petrik for her generous assistance in reproducing some of the digital images. Members of my history reading group have kept me abreast of developments in other fields and pushed my thinking about history in new directions. For their collegiality and intellectual stimulation, I thank Jim Gilbert, Mike Kazin, Nelson Lichtenstein, Melani McAlister, Joe McCartin, Tim Meagher, Terry Murphy, Adam Rothman, and Roy Rosenzweig.

During the years I worked on this project, there were a lot of ups and downs in my personal life. My friends and family offered the love and support that got me through it all. I especially thank Margarita Egan, Kim Gray, Susie Hogan, Laura Kalman, Stacy Moses, Nancy Pfenning, Jolene Reiter, Robin Chapman Stacey, Kathleen Trainor, Deborah Walther, and Ellen Warnock for helping me keep things in perspective. My children, Anthony Morley and Angela Rose Gormley, made sure that I had balance in my life. My husband, Bill Gormley, encouraged me, sustained me, and believed in me the whole time. He knows I probably would have finished the book a lot sooner had I not spent so many hours in my garden. But he also understands why it is important to stop and smell the roses.

Chapter 1
The Rights of Woman

In 1798, less than ten years after the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, the writer Charles Brockden Brown, often considered the country's first professional man of letters, published an article on a controversial topic in his periodical, the Philadelphia Weekly Magazine. Entitled The Rights of Woman, the piece depicted a dialogue between a young man, Alcuin, and his female acquaintance, Mrs. Carter. At one point Alcuin, the namesake of a medieval monk, posed a question to his companion, asking the woman about her preferences in terms of political parties. Instead of deferentially refusing to discuss such an unfeminine topic, Mrs. Carter went on the offensive. What have I, as a woman, to do with politics? she asked. Even the government of our country, which is said to be the freest in the world, passes over women as if they were not [free]. We are excluded from all political rights without the least ceremony. Lawmakers thought as little of comprehending us in their code of liberty, as if we were pigs, or sheep. That females are exceptions to their general maxims perhaps never occurred to them. If it did, the idea was quietly discarded, without leaving behind the slightest consciousness of inconsistency or injustice.

Charles Brockden Brown had gone straight to the heart of a fundamental contradiction in postrevolutionary American society. Although the Revolution had been fought in the name of equality and natural rights, the American political system failed to embody those ideals for substantial portions of its population. It denied equal rights to all black people and to nearly one-half of the white population: women. Although the first organized resistance to slavery began to emerge at this time, there was no comparable movement for women's rights. Most historians, in fact, assume that the first widespread debates about women's rights did not occur until the decade or so preceding the Seneca Falls Convention of 1848. Yet, as Brown's tirade suggests, the first agitation about women's rights can actually be traced to the years immediately following the Revolution, or even earlier, to Enlightenment discussions about the role of women in history and society. Although the American Revolution was not fought in an effort to promote women's rights, the commitment Or would the new country treat its women, as Brown claimed, merely like pigs, or sheep?

Women, Custom, and History

Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Revolutionary Backlash: Women and Politics in the Early American Republic»

Look at similar books to Revolutionary Backlash: Women and Politics in the Early American Republic. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Revolutionary Backlash: Women and Politics in the Early American Republic»

Discussion, reviews of the book Revolutionary Backlash: Women and Politics in the Early American Republic and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.