• Complain

Karla ORegan - Law and Consent: Contesting the Common Sense

Here you can read online Karla ORegan - Law and Consent: Contesting the Common Sense full text of the book (entire story) in english for free. Download pdf and epub, get meaning, cover and reviews about this ebook. publisher: Routledge, genre: Romance novel. Description of the work, (preface) as well as reviews are available. Best literature library LitArk.com created for fans of good reading and offers a wide selection of genres:

Romance novel Science fiction Adventure Detective Science History Home and family Prose Art Politics Computer Non-fiction Religion Business Children Humor

Choose a favorite category and find really read worthwhile books. Enjoy immersion in the world of imagination, feel the emotions of the characters or learn something new for yourself, make an fascinating discovery.

No cover
  • Book:
    Law and Consent: Contesting the Common Sense
  • Author:
  • Publisher:
    Routledge
  • Genre:
  • Rating:
    5 / 5
  • Favourites:
    Add to favourites
  • Your mark:
    • 100
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5

Law and Consent: Contesting the Common Sense: summary, description and annotation

We offer to read an annotation, description, summary or preface (depends on what the author of the book "Law and Consent: Contesting the Common Sense" wrote himself). If you haven't found the necessary information about the book — write in the comments, we will try to find it.

Consent is everywhere. It regulates our relationships with social and political institutions, with one another, and even with our own bodies. The wide variety of issues that consent is assigned to adjudicate suggests that it means - and does - different things in different contexts. This stands in stark contrast to the common sense claim that is often made about consent as a story of universal freedom, a tale of free will and inalienable agency. The common sense of consent is that it is, and has always been, about autonomy. But has it? Has consent ever had other meanings, in other contexts or time periods? What is achieved when the meaning of consent is positioned as a matter of common sense? What does this apparent transparency keep obscure? Moreover, is personal autonomy the outcome of consent laws today? Or is this promise of freedom simply an illusion? What happens to the laws and norms that govern our relationships with one another when this magic of consent is tested? Through an exploration of sexual offences in Antiquity, medical practice in the Middle Ages, and the regulation of bodily harm on the present-day sports field, this book demonstrates that, in contrast to its common sense story of autonomy, consent more often operates as an act of submission than as a kind of personal freedom or agency. The book explores the implications of this counter-narrative for a number of contemporary legal fields, including criminal, medical, and private law, arguing that the kind of freedom consent is meant to enact might be foreclosed by the very frame in which we think about autonomy itself.

ion of sexual offences in Antiquity, medical practice in the Middle Ages, and the regulation of bodily harm on the present-day sports field, this book demonstrates that, in contrast to its common sense story of autonomy, consent more often operates as an act of submission than as a kind of personal freedom or agency. The book explores the implications of this counter-narrative for a number of contemporary legal fields, including criminal, medical, and private law, arguing that the kind of freedom consent is meant to enact might be foreclosed by the very frame in which we think about autonomy itself.

Karla ORegan: author's other books


Who wrote Law and Consent: Contesting the Common Sense? Find out the surname, the name of the author of the book and a list of all author's works by series.

Law and Consent: Contesting the Common Sense — read online for free the complete book (whole text) full work

Below is the text of the book, divided by pages. System saving the place of the last page read, allows you to conveniently read the book "Law and Consent: Contesting the Common Sense" online for free, without having to search again every time where you left off. Put a bookmark, and you can go to the page where you finished reading at any time.

Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make
Law and Consent Consent is used in many different social and legal contexts - photo 1
Law and Consent
Consent is used in many different social and legal contexts with the pervasive understanding that it is, and has always been, about autonomy but has it?
Beginning with an overview of consents role in law today, this book investigates the doctrines inseparable association with personal autonomy and its effect in producing both idealised and demonised forms of personhood and agency. This prompts a search for alternative understandings of consent. Through an exploration of sexual offences in Antiquity, medical practice in the Middle Ages, and the regulation of bodily harm on the present-day sports field, this book demonstrates that, in contrast to its common sense story of autonomy, consent more often operates as an act of submission than as a form of personal freedom or agency. The book explores the implications of this counter-narrative for the laws contemporary uses of consent, arguing that the kind of freedom consent is meant to enact might be foreclosed by the very frame in which we think about autonomy itself.
This book will be of interest to scholars of many aspects of law, history, and feminism as well as students of criminal law, bioethics, and political theory.
Karla M. ORegan is an Associate Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at St. Thomas University, Canada.
First published 2020
by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
and by Routledge
52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
A Glasshouse book
2020 Karla M. ORegan
The right of Karla M. ORegan to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: ORegan, M. Karla, author.
Title: Law and consent: contesting the common sense / Karla M. ORegan.
Description: New York, NY : Routledge, 2019. | Includes index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2019013333 (print) | LCCN 2019013388 (ebook) |
ISBN 9780429465017 (ebk) | ISBN 9781138612501 (hbk)
Subjects: LCSH: Consent (Law)
Classification: LCC K5087.C6 (ebook) |
LCC K5087.C6 O74 2019 (print) | DDC 346.01dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2019013333
ISBN: 978-1-138-61250-1 (hbk)
ISBN: 978-0-429-46501-7 (ebk)
Typeset in Galliard
by codeMantra
For JR
This book is based on my doctoral dissertation at the London School of Economics, which would not have been possible without research funding from the Schools Law Department and the reckless confidence of my doctoral supervisor, Susan Marks. I am grateful for the kind and insightful direction she offered this project. Many others supported this project in its early stages, in particular Nicola Lacey and Jill Peay. I am also indebted to Emily Jackson and Alain Pottage, who were charitable readers at a time when the work was far from clear, and to Linda Mulcahy and Lindsay Farmer, whose generous and careful work as examiners enriched my reflections on what this book could be.
I owe a great deal of thanks to my home institution, St. Thomas University, which granted me a leave of absence to pursue my doctoral work and a sabbatical to write the book. My departmental colleagues have been a constant source of encouragement, in particular Claire Goggin, Susan Reid, Michael Boudreau, and Dawne Clarke. I am also thankful for my students, who keep me curious about law and its possibilities, and grateful for the Jenns (Gorham and Richard) of the Fredericton Sexual Assault Centre, whose graceful tenacity keeps me hopeful for change.
A number of scholars were very generous with their work, including Clare Morgana Gillis, Hilary Young, Annette Houlihan, and Michael Thomson. I am also grateful to the editorial and production teams at Routledge, who have both supported and improved this work in its preparation for publication, particularly Colin Perrin, Nicola Sharpe, and Nazrine Azeez and her team at codeMantra. I also owe a great debt to Elizabeth Matheson, for her excellent work assembling the books index, and to St. Thomas Universitys Senate Research Committee for funds to support her Research Assistantship.
Many friends, neighbours, and colleagues have been instrumental in getting me to the finish line, some by reading drafts or simply asking for progress reports, others by offering their homes, baked goods, senses of humour, or hockey expertise. Many others are wonderfully adept at brewing tea and lifting pints (and spirits). For this and much more, I am grateful for Roxana and Zach Atkinson Rachel and Clarence Bennett, Tania Breen, Helen Brown Coverdale, Kathy and Gus Chan, Mary Coady, Tanya Duffy and Greg Webber, Fred and Lois Horsley, Russ and Anne Hunt, Moon Joyce, Heather Kelly, Rob Knox, Martha Kolls and Mark Schram, Brad Lemon, Katie MacDonald, Patrick and Sylvia Malcolmson, Karolyn Martin, Ewan McGaughey, George McIntyre, Tricia Morris, Thom Parkhill and Pat Sikes, Eric and Sherry Price, Christa and Darren Priest, Matt Richardson, AJ Ripley and Jess Webster, the Belching Lasses, CBC Radio, and Nice Guy Graeme Walker. My family has been a constant source of support and encouragement. For this and a great deal else, I thank and love you: Mom, Dad, Stephen, Joan, Emily, Jamie, Bailey, Rylan, Hope, Bill, Mark, and Devon.
And to the pack: I write this amidst the snores of two very old cats and one very new puppy, while JR keeps a dinner he made for us warm on the stove. He is owed the greatest of my gratitude, for his warmth and tireless patience, unflappable kindness, and stellar mix tapes. He flew across the world with me (and back again) so I could write this, never once doubting that I would. It is to him that this book is dedicated. Stuff and nonsense, my love, and a road without end.
List of abbreviations
Acc Bus Finan Hist Accounting, Business, and Financial History
AJPhil American Journal of Philology
Akron LR Akron Law Review
Alt LJ Alternative Law Journal
Am Behav Sci American Behavioral Scientist
Am Crim L Rev American Criminal Law Review
Am Econ Rev American Economic Review
Am Hist Rev American Historical Review
Am J Bioeth American Journal of Bioethics
Am J Econ & Soc American Journal of Economics & Sociology
Am J Soc American Journal of Sociology
Am Studies J American Studies Journal
Ann R Coll Surg Engl Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
Ariz St LJ Arizona State Law Journal
BCL Rev Boston College Law Review
Book Psychoanal Book of Psychoanalysis
BMJ British Medical Journal
Next page
Light

Font size:

Reset

Interval:

Bookmark:

Make

Similar books «Law and Consent: Contesting the Common Sense»

Look at similar books to Law and Consent: Contesting the Common Sense. We have selected literature similar in name and meaning in the hope of providing readers with more options to find new, interesting, not yet read works.


Reviews about «Law and Consent: Contesting the Common Sense»

Discussion, reviews of the book Law and Consent: Contesting the Common Sense and just readers' own opinions. Leave your comments, write what you think about the work, its meaning or the main characters. Specify what exactly you liked and what you didn't like, and why you think so.